Durkheim And Weber's Theory: The Division Of Labor In Society

Superior Essays
The investigation of individual experiences, beliefs and conducts which are shaped by social forces, is the main aim of social science. But Social theories consist of diverse and often contradictory approaches about what is social science and what methods and presuppositions should sociologist take into consideration when they study the social phenomena (Kadakal, 2013). The aim of this essay is to present the main ideas of Durkheim and Weber, two of the founding fathers of social science, through their studies persuaded to examine the social issues which occurred in Europe during the 19thcentury.Firstly outlined Durkheim’s positivist empirical method of studying the social reality and his main ideas of his works ‘The Division of Labor in Society …show more content…
Durkheim was a positivist scientist and he argue that sociology rely on empirical evidences. Durkheim, argue that the laws of society are no different from laws of nature, and the method in which the society should be studied, is the same with the method of the natural sciences. As the nature has laws which are given to us, society has social objective structures which are external to and constraining upon the individual. These structures are the collective standards, the norms and the rules of behavior within the society. Durkheim called these rules as ‘social facts’. The main two characteristics of the social facts are their externality and their constraint. People have not the free chose of behaving, but they should to confront to the …show more content…
His ideas can be found in two of Durkheim’s greatest works: The Division of Labor in Society (1893) and Suicide (1895). In the first, Durkheim’s doctoral thesis is that individuals shared conceptions and they act and behave as social wholes. It is vital for the good function of society the presence of cohesion or solidarity among the individuals. For Durkheim there are two types of social solidarity: the mechanic solidarity and the organic solidarity. In mechanic solidarity there is interdependence between people. People in this primitive society used to work at the same areas and almost have the same occupations. The members of this society have collective consciousness; the values and norms are very important and there is supremacy of the social order over the individuals. Any behavior against the values of the group, used to be punished violently. (Durkheim 1966). The other type of solidarity, which shapes on modern/industrialized societies, is the organic solidarity. The industrialization in these modern societies lead to the specialization of occupations so people work independently. This society has establish a social division of labor. Each member plays a special role and doing one significant task which contribute to the working of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Actors Society is constituted by human beings. Although sociologists seldom endow agency to individuals, they still describes some of the actions of the actors in their works. The two theorists here are French theorists, who have tendency toward bestowing less agency to the actors as most French theorists do. However, their discussion cannot lose the part of actors if they want a whole picture instead of a partial one. In my view, albeit Durkheim and Foucault are similar at putting less emphasis on the actors and giving them less power, they are different in identifying and investigating the actors.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anomie “As soon as I was inside, I couldn’t think of anyone to call up.” (Salindger 66) Anomie is a concept used popularly by French sociologist Émile Durkheim in his book The Division of Labor in Society. It refers to a condition of "normlessness" when people are not sufficiently integrated into group life. Durkheim was interested in the shift in society from urban to industrial.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many of the works and theories of the social theorists during the 19th and early 20th century are still relevant today even with all the changes that we have gone through as a society. The issues discussed in Weber’s and Marx’s class theories; DuBois’ theories about race and Durkheim 's theories on society and labor are the basis on which many of today’s ideologies are derived. Karl Marx was a class theorist and theorized about class struggles and the ideal class society. He also had theories about the construction of society and the interaction between the wealthy and working classes which he called the bourgeoisie and the proletariats. One of his major ideas was that of alienation of the working class.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim explains how the division of labor gain so much attention and became so widespread. The forces of the division of labor were a problem for Durkheim because the modern society had changed from the traditional society in various ways. To explain the difference of traditional and modern societies Durkheim introduced two forms of solidarity: mechanical and organic. These two types of social integrations examine the different actions and ideas societies had on the division of labor.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Serious inquiry as to the enduring truth of Durkheim’s conclusions must first decide whether or not his data continues to back those conclusions. By comparing his conclusions to data and similar statistics from modern studies, one…

    • 1353 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Functionalism The functionalism, is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology. It has been rooted in the works of Emile Durkheim, and further developed by Talcott Parsons and Robert Merton. Emile Durkheim argued in his work The division of Labor in Society (1893), that the broad structures (values, norms, and belief systems) and institutions (economy, politics, education, religion, and family) of society work together to maintain the stability of society and keep it functioning well (Carter, 2011). He believed that people are constrained and coercion by the social facts, which exist within and are generalizable in the same way in all society but external to the individual, such as norms, values and institutions (Carter, 2011; Turner, 2013).…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The social world around us is changing. Some claim it is growing, others say it is shrinking. The crucial thing to understand is that society does not remain unchanged overtime. [Putnam, Robert D.2001]. Both Marx and Durkheim had their own view on how society, and the people within the society should work.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim viewed Modernity as a new way of thinking. Durkheim’s ‘The Division of Labour in Society’ (1893) says that there are two diverse types of solidarity, which Durkheim believed was the key to society. These two types are organic solidarity and mechanical solidarity. One aspect of Modernity that worried…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Challenging common sense! Thinking sociologically Challenging common sense is almost the daily routine for a sociologist. Sociological thinkers tackle social issues not only by the front cover but rather dig deeper and engage in the process of abstraction. To think sociologically is to critique the common assumptions and perceptions regarding the many issues that exist in the society [1].…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Emile Durkheim’s book The Division of Labor in Society, there is a passage, on page 312, in which he writes about the division of labor, solidarity, and spontaneity. I will break down what these three terms means to him and what he was trying to convey to his audience, at the time. Durkheim believed that solidarity is what made a healthy, organic society. An organic society, to him, was one where there was still inequality, but more specifically, natural inequality. He saw there being two kinds of inequalities.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What will be mentioned is the comparison and contrast of Marx’s and Durkheim’s ideas. To begin with, Karl Marx states how labor can cause alienation towards a worker…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marx’s views becoming a dynamic political movement in the form of Marxism while Durkheim’s works contributed to the creation of functionalism, this exemplifies how both had a major role in the formation of sociology. The contrasting views of Marx and Durkheim on the division of labour will be explored…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlottesville: A Durkheimian Perspective Introduction Emile Durkheim plays a pivotal role in the field of sociology. His innovative research paved the way to new theories that help us explain and understand the way society works. Durkheim is responsible for numerous contributions to the field of sociology, but is often known for his theories on collective conscience, solidarity, and anomie. Collective Conscience Collective conscience denotes the interest of the collective level of society (Emile Durkheim). Durkheim's theory on collective conscience refers to the “totality of beliefs and sentiments common to average citizens of the same society” that “forms a determinate system which has its own life” (Durkheim 38-39) or collective representations.…

    • 896 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx, Emile Durkheim and Max Weber are three fundamental figureheads in the foundation of sociology who asserted that our lifestyles are products of the society in which we live. They all lived in a period of great social change, that of the Industrial Revolution, and based their writings and musings upon what they observed happening around them and extrapolated as to the condition of the future. One foundational product of contemporary societies, that truly came into existence at the time during which they were writing, would be the economy and economic life. Looking at it on a macro level perspective, it is one of the aspects of the social superstructure. It is a social institution by itself, but it also shares a give and take relationship with other institutions in society and the superstructure such as education, ethics, law, religion, etc.…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Durkheim was able to take someone 's individual behavior and study and understand it within a social context. Durkheim theory help take solitary acts and allow people to expand it to see a connection with the larger society by pointing out the influence of group and social forces on the…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics