During The Great Compromise Analysis

Decent Essays
During the Great Compromise American leaders had to decide what plan of action they should take when improving America’s weak government. State representation was a major controversy between the north and the south. In my personal opinion, I think that states should have a proportional representation in Congress according to its population also stated in the Virginia plan.
The reasoning behind my conclusion is that, yes, some states are larger than others and may be split in opinion. I feel that larger states should have more representatives so they can their opinion in government

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The great compromise was a way to get small state to not go and uproar because they were getting tired of being ignored and being forgotten because they didn’t have a big population. The big states were wanted more representatives based on population and thought if you have more people then you would get a lot more control over what laws go and don’t go. The little states were getting mad because they didn’t have much power when it came to law making they just had to sit back and deal with it…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smaller states were in favor of the New Jersey Plan, under which all states would have the same amount of representation in the legislature. On the other finger, large…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The New Jersey Plan Essay

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What type of representation did the Virginia Plan call for? The type of representation the Virginia call for is the “proportional representation” where states that have larger population will have more representative than the states that have smaller population. It means that states with more number of people would have more to say in the politics and would receive more representatives. 3) How was the Virginia Plan connected to slavery?…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise of 1850 The “Compromise of 1850” was a resolution constructed by Henry Clay in an attempt to appease both Northerners and Southerners, in regards to if the new territorial expansions acquired from the war with Mexico and subsequent “Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo” in 1848, should allow slavery. The compromise allowed California to be a free state and gave New Mexico and Utah the policy of “Popular Sovereignty” or the ability for the people of the state to decide on slavery. Texas was given relief on 10 millions dollars worth of debt in the compromise for the re-allotment of a portion of it 's land to New Mexico. The compromise also outlawed slavery in Washington DC, as the spectacle was a national embarrassment.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The years following 1850 proved to be a time of political turmoil in the United States. With slavery still being utilized in the South, it seemed that the Northern and Southern politicians would always be at odds. This opposition would always exist between the North and South so long as slavery existed. During the period preceding the Compromise of 1850 politicians were able to formulate compromises that barely appeased both sides. Eventually there was nothing else to do to satisfy both sides of the country.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1860 Political Compromise

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I think the political compromise over the sectional crisis of the 1850s seemed impossible by the 1860 because of the events leading up to the 1860 election and the election itself. The North’s neglect to obey the Fugitive State Law angered southern states and was a problem especially for Border States. When I slave was able to escape to the north, they did everything they could to make the slave a “free man”. A known fact about the north is they hated slavery as Henry Benning explained in his speech, and president Buchanan did nothing to prevent the secession of the seven states, as congress was more active during Buchanan’s time as president. All of the events angered or did little to prevent the events about to take place in the south and…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution guards against tyranny by utilizing all three branches to keep each other in check. Each branch of government is separate, which allows them to not abuse their power and take advantage of people. Small and large states need to have one representative, as well as two senators. The three branches of government have prevented tyranny for a long time.…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, the distribution of representation from the Virginia and New Jersey Plan widely differed. The Virginia Plan was highly represented by the more populous states within the federal government and the New Jersey Plan seemed to provide most of their representation through smaller states who wanted to prevent unbalancing the United…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Debate

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Prior to The Great Compromise of 1787, the two main plans put forth at the Constitutional Convention were the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan. The larger states favored the Virginia Plan, as the number of representatives in both houses of Congress per state was based strictly on population, giving them more power. The smaller states preferred the New Jersey Plan, which ensured that all states had the same number of votes. The Great Compromise, which became the basis of the new American government, was possible through the coming together of the small states and the large states. In this new plan, the number of representatives per state in the lesser House was based on population and the number of representatives in the upper House was the same for each state, satisfying both sides of the debate (Lapsansky-Werner, 356).…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Confederation Compromises

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Virginia Plan said that the number of votes per state should be determined by population, meaning states with higher population would have more votes in Congress, and states with less population would have less…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Although popular demand typically determines decisions made within America, the government overrules them in order to get results that they want. Prior to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, America created the Missouri Compromise, which allowed states under the border of Missouri and Missouri itself to be slave states, while anything over the border of Missouri must be free and allowed a ratio of 1:1 slave to free states be admitted into the Union. However, when determining whether Kansas would be a free state or not, the popular sovereignty that ranked highest was for it being a free state. Nevertheless, the government decided to admit Kansas in as a slave state. Not only did this oppose the Missouri Compromise as it broke the geographical line that…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the 1800s tension was beginning to build between the north and south over the issue of slavery. Three major compromises helped contribute to these tensions and lead to eventual war. These are the Missouri Compromise, the Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. These compromises and their effects had major consequences that shaped the nation of their time.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It helps the smaller states because everyone has the same number of people which is two. That is, how the great compromise fixes tyranny. In conclusion, federalism, the separation of power, checks, and balances, and the great compromise helped prevent tyranny. All of these rules helped the United States stay a tyranny-free nation because they all stopped all the power from being in the same place.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It was undeniable that the Great Compromise solved one of the biggest problems that came up in the Articles of Confederation, which was the legislature for voting and representation. In the Articles of Confederation, each state only had one vote regardless of the size of the state, which made it unfair for the larger states that they did not have the same power as the smaller states. The Great Compromise successfully fixed the problem by combining the Virginia Plan and the New Jersey Plan so that equal representation of states was given to the Senate and proportional representation was given to the House of Representatives. Two chambers in the congress were established, which were the Senate and the House of Representatives. These important…

    • 240 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays