Dunkin donuts are notorious for providing coffee for everyone across the country and making sure everyone is treated equally. By not firing the employee after crossing the line of respect shows a lot of classes. It shows the employee has the right to fight for black lives matter but not do it in a setting that effects a major cooperation. Personally I think the employee should have just kept their opinion to themselves, it was very unprofessional to put it on the cup in the first place. They should have chosen the professional path and not written anything on the cup at all. By doing that, a lot of problems could have been avoided. There is a time and place for everything. This also goes along with the cop’s response to the …show more content…
The employee made a mistake by stereotyping the officer and like I said before should have never written anything on the cup. But it did happen and I feel like the police officer could have taken it a different way. The cop responded in a way that showed so much negative emotion. The police could have just taken the cup and walked away from the situation, but instead he made it a huge deal and began to blame black lives matter as a whole. Not all people who support black lives matter is trying to bring down all cops. The cop stereotypes the group based on this one person, which isn’t right at all. Overall Dunkin donuts handled the problem with a lot of class. They did not give one side more satisfaction or justice. This concludes that both sides were at fault and are in need to fix their personal judgments. The Employee should have never written it and even if the employee did write it the cop should have just ignored it. The stereotyping between the two groups is what’s causing the black lives matter movement to not be a positive