Dulce Et Decorum Est

Good Essays
The two poems, "Dulce et Decorum Est" by Wilfred Owen and "Who's for the Game?" by Jessie Pope both give different points of view on the war, and cause different effects on the reader. "Dulce et Decorum Est" makes it clear that the author is against the war, and makes the reader cringe at the thought of it. However, the author of "Who's for the game" is for it, and makes the reader want to join in on the action.

The author of "Dulce et Decorum Est" is clearly against the war. The author conveys this by making the war sound as terrible as possible. It uses phrases to describe the experience like, choking, blood-shod, drowning, gargling, helpless, and cursed. These phrases all carry a negative connotation that is clearly aimed for being against the war. The author of "Who's for the Game?", however has quite a different
…show more content…
"Dulce Decorum Est" goes into great detail about the horrors of the war, and even describes the dramatic death of a man next to him. "I saw him drowning...He plunges at me, guttering, choking, and drowning." By doing so, it gives the effect to the reader of making them cringe and gawk at the terrors of war. On the other hand, "Who's for the Game" has another take on it. The playful rhyming aspect makes the reader think optimistically on the subject. The title also does so, by describing the war as a "game". More importantly though, it affects the reader by making them want to join. The poem states, "And she's looking and calling for you." This makes the war seem exciting, and expresses the need for help, causing the effect for the reader to want to join.

The two poems both present different points of view on the war, and cause different effects on the reader. "Dulce et Decorum Est" makes it clear that the author is against the war, and makes the reader dislike it. On the other hand, the author of "Who's for the game" is for the war, and makes the reader want to join in on the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    First, both pieces use tone to help the reader get a deeper understanding of the consequences of war. In the poem Owen writes, “ Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues My friend you would not tell with…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People go to war coming back changed as a person which is sometimes believed to be better and other times believed to be worse. Many people go to war for the sake of serving the country while others fear war and are scared of all the horrors people believe are involved in the act of going to war. The two poems talk about war but their purpose is different for the reason they are talking about war. The two poems can be compared due to their different points of view, the message the poem is trying to get out, and the effect the poem has on the reader. The two poems are different due to their different points of view.…

    • 845 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The story is told in the very hard-to-understand way that it is to show how chaotic and messy war is. The characters are all very quirky and strange in their own ways, but I think that is meant to show what wars can do to the people involved. Joseph Heller seems to be very against war, and he decided to show…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The shifts as the audience changes interpretation. Common diction is being used when the “words” are being used in war, but when he talks about how politicians use it, then it becomes convoluted. He wrote “the language we use about war is inappropriate” meaning it is sugar coated. “Conceal reality so odious” is an outside source who confirms and clarifies the picture he’s trying to display by providing additional point of views for the argument. Huxley’s habit of engaging misinterpretations “same abstract word to describe the two dissimilar processes is profoundly misleading” to emphasis on the numerous amounts of people who collide with war itself in order to support politicians’ expectations and later answering in parenthesis “(Still more misleading, of course, is the explicit assimilation of a war)” solves a problems in clarification and theme throughout the essay by anticipating any oppositions at the same time addresses the multiple “shades”…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since the soldier’s face is demonstrated this way, the line indicates that the soldier is questioning the reasons why he is at war. In addition, the use of his simile can convey how a devil can be appalled by his sight. The effective language and imagery enhances the horror of war, reinforcing the image of a man dying from a gas…

    • 1198 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    War seems to be without worth in every instance, this is because even if the war has one of Russel’s justifications, human nature is to take things too far and commit preventable acts based on pride that makes war become mass-murder. Not only taking away the lives of the innocent but also taking away the lives of those who made it out. Just like Vonnegut’s overall idea of war, I too see that war doesn’t deserve a response. One can’t respond to war in any way humanly possible, we can only react to it. Despite all the possible justifications provided by Russel, I don’t see how anyone can refute the horrendous truth of war after reading a novel like…

    • 2714 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Is this the real definition of war? I do not agree! I believe his experience went beyond the psychological tolerance of violence, hence as a defense, he is trying to make sense of so much horror. I do agree with Hedges that war eviscerates the worse and the best of human beings from cowardly to heroism. Hedges defines the wars and ethnic conflicts of our times as “manufactured” (The Myth of War, pdf.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the logic of war Basically war is a conflict between two sovereign countries or a fight for independent. War has negative impact over the society. If there is war between two countries, people get killed, hungry, and there is no development. Selfishness is the most reason of war, on the other hand some people involve on war to get their independent. Mohammed claims there is language behind any war.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hardy and Remarque utilize ambiguity in very different ways to convey a similar idea that war creates unlikely enemies. This idea is supported by the double-meanings of the ambiguous words, which hold two different definitions but still relate to the same topic. Specifically in the last stanza of “The Man He Killed”, Hardy arrives at a thoughtful conclusion about war, writing, “Yes; quaint and curious war is!” (17). The ambiguity in his assertion lies in the word “quaint”, which has a double meaning of both ‘unusual’ and ‘old-fashioned’. Hardy uses the word “quaint” as meaning ‘unusual’ by implying that the soldiers are made to perform actions which regular civilians would not do in their whole life; for example, soldiers are made to kill…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This demonstrates the use of structure to protest war because it gives the audience an idea of how the conditions of war were very poor. It effects the reader because having an understanding of the reality of war can make one resent the idea or the thought of war. Both Powers and O’Brien use the idea of structure to try and portray that war…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays