Mind Body Dualism Essay

Decent Essays
It is extremely difficult to conceptualize our minds and bodies. On one hand, our mind is all we know. On the other hand, the physical world is all we interact with and deemed reality. Philosophers have many theories on the existence and interaction between the mental and physical worlds. Through the exploration and criticisms of dualism and the identity theory, I believe that mental states have innate and constructed qualities that do not equate entirely to the physical world.
Mind body dualism, a theory described by Descartes, states that humans are not simply physical beings. It argues that the mind and the body are two separate things thus meaning that there is a mental world and a physical world. The mental world consists of things such
…show more content…
Everyone seems to have an innate mentality that cannot be replicated. However, this mentality is hard to prove because it is only shown through a physical realm. My only real knowledge of mentality is through myself. Most of the times I feel that my mental state is reflected through my actions, but not always. For example, sometimes I am quiet around large groups of people. However, I often feel that this physical state does not seem to reflect my mental state. Therefore I fully believe that a mental and physical world exists and that are not exactly equal. The part of dualism that I find hard to understand is the communication aspect between mind and body due to a physical change. To illustrate this, I, Sophie, think of myself being in a car accident. Before this accident, my mentality is humorous and I am a relatively happy person. Unfortunately though, I get in a car accident which results in brain damage. After the accident, this “Sophie” appears to change. I become aggressive and no longer make jokes. Does my old mental state cease to exist or is it there but no longer reflected? My only explanation is that the physical body to an extent overrides the mind. However, if my physical body is not reflecting my mental state, I believe that my mental state would become something different than before. I believe that if I was thinking humorous things but physically it was coming out as anger, I would mentally become an angrier person in certain ways. At the same time, as I discussed earlier, I know that in my physical life and am in a crowd being quiet, my quietness does not always reflect the thoughts I am having in my head. Therefore, I think that a separate mental and physical realm exist, but physical things and mental things affect one

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Mind-Body Problem is the argument surrounding questions such as: “How does the mind relate to the body (brain)? Are they—the mind and the brain—separate? Does the mind even exist, or is there really just the brain? If both exist, how do they interact? If not, how does one explain certain mental states without the mind?”.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    “I think therefore I am,” the popular quote of philosopher Descartes, is the main premise of his theory of Mind-body Dualism. Interactionism is the theory that there are two realities, mind and body, each of which can have an effect on the other. In contrast, dualists claim that the mind and body are two separate realities. The body is a material thing that operates in a physical reality, while the mind and mental states operate in a nonphysical reality. For the dualist, the way of thinking is an internal thinking on the inside that is private.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Regarding the relationship between the body and the mind, people cannot avoid two important philosophy concepts:, Physicalism, and Functionalism. Physicalism believes that the only substance exist is physical. Functionalism suggests that mental states are the internal cause of behavior.(Braddon-Mitchell&jackson p41). In this paper, I will mainly discuss four perspectives about Physicalism, Functionalism and the argument “ What is it like to be”. First, what’s Physicalism?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though the brain states can be studied and explained through science; mental states are unexplainable and there are not able to be scientifically examined. However, this means that when the brain (body) dies then so does the mind since it is derived through the brain (Mohn, 2017). Within property dualist, there is epiphenomenalism which believes that the physical world influences our mental states but out mental states cannot influence our brain states. Or there is interactionism where one believes that mental states such as our desires provide guidance to our brain states (Mohn,…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The mind-brain problem, previously called the mind body problem was initially conceptualised by Descartes following his work on the metaphysical aspects of the soul during the 17th century. Descartes described the mind and brain in his book the Meditations on First Philosophy; "But what then am I? A thing that thinks. What is that? A thing that doubts, understands, affirms, denies, wills, refuses, and which also imagines and senses.”…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This Dualist idea presents the Mind and Body as separate things made of separate stuff. The Body is external and public whereas the Mind is internal and private. This view pushes that the Mind and Body are still connected, however, explaining that what the Mind wills the Body does. The Doctrine justifies this connection by explaining two separate…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Such matters are able to be explained through the evidence of empirical research on the brain. Thus, it cancels out how there is an unknown development of interaction between the mind and the body since all development of the mind can be traced by to the how the brain of the body was impacted. Which leads to how physicalism is the stronger answer to the mind-body question given the argument of dualism lives us with more of a hypothetical…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Searle and Descartes being separated by nearly four centuries provides a rough landscape for a philosophical discussion to be conducted upon. Both Searle and Descartes have inherent biases based upon their location on the timeline, Searle with modern science and Descartes with religion and the church. Being that the two are opposed, I think that Searle is able to articulate effectively his positions and respond to Descartes’ claims properly. If positioned at the same location along the timeline and granted the knowledge that Searle possess, I think that Descartes, assuming he had an open mind, would agree with Searle’s propositions and subsequent conclusion.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The argument whether or not the mind and the body are distinct substances raises a still on-going debate. In this essay, I proceed to give evidence as to why the Cartesian dualism theory is flawed. First, I am going to introduce a few of Descartes’ arguments and his position on the matter. Then, I will try to pick his most appealing argument and put it up against logical reasoning and other philosophers’ viewpoints. Finally, I am going to conclude how Rene Descartes proposes fallacious arguments which object his mind-body problem.…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism still struggles with this. However, Behaviorism dissolves this problem because again, in virtue of its physicalist foundation, it implicitly assumes a consistency among other humans that Substance dualism doubted. Because of this, minds are physically the same and only experientially different and so can be assumed to operate similarly to one another. Because of the physicalism of Behaviorism, it is able to dissolve two long existing problems of…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Intellect:Mind over Matter, Mortimer Adler probes the relationship between the mind and the body. He describes the four main theories regarding this relationship and separates them into two categories: extreme and moderate. Among the four theories, Adler argues in favor of moderate immaterialism. His argument is easily the most convincing as it accounts for the essential difference between man and animal, our intellect, while acknowledging the congruity between the mind and body.…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of them specifically says that there is a distinct disconnection between the mind and body because if you were to hurt a part of the body, it would not directly affect the mind in any form. It would send sensory signals to the brain but the mind itself is still intact. I agree with this because if you were to dislocate your knee for example, your body would send sensory signals of pain to the brain and may not be in a good physical condition but your mind would be. You may be slightly discouraged or feel upset about the situation, but ultimately the dislocation of your knee has not affected your mind. I believe that this confirms his conclusion because he also gives a similar example.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays