Dualism: Relationship Between Mind And Mind

Great Essays
We process with our brains and we feel with our minds. As a result, the relationship between brain and mind is a strange one. In some cases, the two words can be used interchangeably and in others they lose this synonymatic quality. The brain is described in terms of the physical: it has properties like weight and mass. In contrast, the mind is described in terms of the mental: it has properties like accessibility through introspection and pattern recognition. Philosophers disagree on the exact relation between these two entities. One school of thought, dualism, suggests that the mind and body are separate. Another, called physicalism, dictates that the two are essentially the same only observed differently. In this essay, I will use Leibniz’s …show more content…
A mental state can be expressed as a thought, belief, or feeling, while a brain state is basically a pattern of neurons firing. These two states do not appear to share the same properties. Again, one is mental and the other is physical. The two states are related; the pattern of neurons firing results in a thought, belief, or feeling being processed, however just because one thing results in another thing does not mean they are identical. Causation is not equal to identity.
Another apparent difference between mental states and brain states is the idea that mental states can be accessed through introspection, the act of examining one’s own mental and emotional processes (Merriam-Webster). This serves as the basis for my argument in support of dualism which can be illustrated in the following
…show more content…
Physicalism is contingent on the idea that science is constantly evolving and as a result our understanding of the universe is constantly increasing. From the physicalist point of view, a brain state and a mental state are the same thing, they are just presented differently. Consider the following case: my father is a firefighter, but my friends do not know that. One day, I tell them a story about my father. The next day, I tell them a story about a firefighter on the job. Unless I specifically mention that said firefighter is my father, they are unlikely to assume the two men are the same person. Language plays a large role in this case. The mode of presentation of a condition affects the way the condition is perceived. Since the English language does not equate father and firefighter, the two are not seen as equal. However, there is no reason that a male firefighter could not be a father or that someone’s father could not be a firefighter. Philosopher U.T. Place refers to these distinctions as “scientific technicalities” (Place). When relating mental states to brain states, scientific technicalities prevent them from being identical as they are described with modes of presentations that cannot clearly be observed as identical. In applying this concept to the dualist argument, we can see that the current definition of introspection prevents it from being viewed as a property of a brain state.

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Mind/Body Problem

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Substance dualists fall into several areas depending upon how they think mind and body are related. Property dualists argue that mental states are complex qualities of brain states. Interactionists believe that minds and bodies causally affect one another. Epiphenomenalists offer a compromise theory, asserting that bodily events can have mental events as effects while denying that the reverse is true. Dualism has a very extensive field of explanations to the mind body problem, all different versions of the same basic view, just applied more flexible which the other views do not offer.…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualists Analysis

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the mind and body case, the materialists can argue that mental action and the physical action, although are two things, are correlated or even inseparable in a way. They can suggest that the mental action cannot exist without physical action, and the mental action might just be an ability of a certain physical action. Therefore the two causes might be just one. Notwithstanding, I believe the dualistic interactionists will point out that even the two causes can be related in some way, this claim can’t sufficiently prove that one cause are part of the other cause or one cause is just an sub-cause belonging to the…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The mind and brain are exist in separate but they have interaction between two of them. Hence, if there anything goes wrong with the brain (physical), it will affect the activities of the mind as they were related to each other. But, there are also contradiction as when we through the Cartesian Dualism, we cannot agree that one can be error in one own…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Substance dualism considers the mind and brain to be made up of different properties and that the mind is for thinking but is not an attributional object. Descartes ideas of dualism supports this view. Property dualists believe mental properties of consciousness; such as thinking, are non-physical characteristics of physical substances. Fundamentally dualists agree that mind and matter are separate, this is based on the logical argument of Leibniz law; that if two things have different characteristics, they must be separate. The mind is believed to not be made up of physical matter, so mind and brain do not have the same physical properties and therefore according to Leibniz law the physical brain and the mind are therefore not the same.…

    • 1934 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories Of Dualism

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages

    He believed that physical events happening to the material body can be experienced as emotions and thoughts, and mental events also impact the material body. The famous Edward Bradford Titchener was a supporter for both epiphenomenalism and double aspectism. Another popular type of dualism is psychophysical parallelism, which confirms the presence of both the material body and nonmaterial mind but refuse the existence of such interaction between the two. According to psychophysical parallelists, the mind and the body exist independently from each…

    • 1826 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes’ idea that the mind and body are separate is called the “mind-body dualism”. Dualism is the state of being divided, meaning that our mind as humans, and our body are not used as one, but accent each other to make us what we are. He has different arguments in Meditations On First Philosophy that the mind is its own thing and different than the body and brain. He reassures that the mind, as we know, is a thing we use to think and the body is not what we use to think. Therefore, making them two completely separate things.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In philosophy, a theory that includes the viewing of the the mind and body as being separate kinds of substances or natures is known as mind- body dualism. This stance implies that the mind and body not only differ in meaning but refer to different kinds of entities. Thus, a person that proposes the concept of dualism would oppose any theory that identifies mind with the brain, conceived as a physical operant. Descartes reaches this conclusion by arguing that the nature of the mind is completely and utterly distinct from that of the body, and therefore it is possible for one to exist without the other. This argument gives rise to the famous problem of mind-body causal interaction that are still commonly debated today: how can the mind cause…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Does Identity Theory provide a plausible solution to the mind-body problem? The mind body problem asks many questions but the question that will be focused on in this essay is what is the relationship between the body and the mind, in other words the relationship between the physical and the non-physical. This question arose from Cartesian Dualism: the theory that the mind and the body must be separate because they consist of two totally different substances. Substances being “are those things which, according to that system, are the foundational or fundamental entities of reality” Descartes distinguished between the mind substance and the body substance by showing that the essence and properties of these two substances are fundamentally…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The other is the problem of other minds- the objection to Dualism based on the undesired conclusion that if all we can be sure of is our own bodies, we can never know for certain that others even really exist. Dualism still struggles with this. However, Behaviorism dissolves this problem because again, in virtue of its physicalist foundation, it implicitly assumes a consistency among other humans that Substance dualism doubted. Because of this, minds are physically the same and only experientially different and so can be assumed to operate similarly to one another. Because of the physicalism of Behaviorism, it is able to dissolve two long existing problems of…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But did the meaning ever really change or was it merely the definition? In our world mentality means to pertain to the mind, it is how we refer to our thoughts and more. In the fmri world, what now do we call mental? Would it still not be the same even if we did agree that the mind and the brain were one in the same? How would classify such things?…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays