Dualism Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
In this paper, I argue, the human brain and the human mind are two separate entities present in the human body. To demonstrate this point I put forward the following supportive position. The brain and mind of human beings are different from each other. That the brain and mind have distinct roles in human beings. For the first counter argument, I will consider the physical aspect of materialism in regards to the mind and brain. As a response, I will reply, that the human mind and brain are separate, because human beings have free will. In the second opposing argument to dualism, I will present the idealist view that the human mind exists and man’s life is an illusion. As a retort I will submit Descartes founding point of his dualistic theory. In conclusion I will reiterate that the brain and mind are separate from each other, that cartesian dualism is true.
The first argument I put forward to support dualism is; the brain and mind of human beings are different from each other. They both have unique properties and distinctive roles in human beings. The brain has definable characteristics that can be observed and analysed (Robinson, 2012, p.2). For example the activity of the brain when sleeping is examinable on electroencephalograms (Marieb & Hoehn, 2013, p.452). A magnetic resonance
…show more content…
However, in doing so, eliminated all material substances and disregarded science (Holden, 1991, p.1376). Therefore this idealist theory was not well received. Descartes disproved this theory with his own motto “I think, therefore I am” (Holden, 1991, p.1376). In other words, Descartes couldn’t dissuade himself that he did not exist because Descartes realised his thoughts were original. So, Descartes reasoned if his thoughts of his mind are real, the body that houses the thought exists and so the brain is real as well (Holden, 1991,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Yet, Descartes’ duality theory also suggests that the mind is separate from the body. Thus, in that example, the brain would represent the body because the mind is a concept without substance or physical properties – it interacts causally with the body. Therefore, without the body, the mind cannot interact with the real world, experience the senses that cause stimuli, or conclude the thinking that confirms existence. However, with the body, the mind cannot trust its senses - the whole premise of the Dream Argument for Skepticism. Therefore, according to Descartes, the mind is unable to determine its existence with the body, but is also unable to determine its existence without the body.…

    • 1051 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I fully agree with Descartes’s concept of dualism. The mind is a lot more than chemical reactions going on in the brain. Thoughts, feelings, desire are all properties of the mind but not its parts. I…

    • 1328 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Regarding the relationship between the body and the mind, people cannot avoid two important philosophy concepts:, Physicalism, and Functionalism. Physicalism believes that the only substance exist is physical. Functionalism suggests that mental states are the internal cause of behavior.(Braddon-Mitchell&jackson p41). In this paper, I will mainly discuss four perspectives about Physicalism, Functionalism and the argument “ What is it like to be”. First, what’s Physicalism?…

    • 1131 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes does not take into consideration what happens when the brain is damaged, under the influence of drugs and alcohol or affected by mental health. If minds and bodies were really distinct, then the mental substance would not be compromised and not be affected by each other. In my opinion, this is the strongest argument against substance dualism as it addresses the problem that in order for the mind and body to actually be separate, these influences would have no impact on the…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The subject of philosophy is a study that can be viewed in many different ways. Some ways vary in extremes from one another, but they all wish to pursue the same thing; the understanding of knowledge and human excellence. One of the most popular arguments is the comparison of mind and body. Through this paper I will go in depth on the individuals theories and discoveries, then compare them using the ideas from Plato’s Phaedo and Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy. Both philosophers share the same ideas on dualism, and believe the body to be inferior to the mind and/or soul.…

    • 1568 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cartesian Dualism

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages

    They assume that the soul/spirit can be located in a particular place (such as the pineal gland discussed earlier), to which Conway disagrees because “spirit is body and body is spirit.” Secondly, she argues that dualism only leads to mechanism because it has such a hard demarcation between the soul and the body, which entails the body to be some machine or tool that is not integrally associated with the body. Thirdly, Conway says that dualism cannot account for the interaction between mind and body regardless of what Descartes says about the mind-body union because dualists see mechanical motion as the only type of movement possible for material entities. Dualist philosophers seem to think that mind and body are defined by the exclusion of characteristics, as two things that do not have anything in common cannot influence each other. This argument fails to recognize the explicit interaction and communication between the two.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dualism vs Materialism The mind/body problem, the question of what is the relationship between the mind and the body, is commonly seen as a key issue in the philosophy of the mind (Sober, 2013, p. 204). The two categories of views discussed in Sober’s ‘Core Questions in Philosophy’ that attempt to resolve the mind/body problem are dualism and materialism. Dualism is the theory that the mind and the brain are two fundamentally different substances (Sober, 2013, p. 204). Conversely, materialism says that matter is the one and only fundamental substance in nature, and the notion that mental phenomena are a result of physical interactions follows (Sober, 2013, p. 204).…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Descartes is known for doubting physical objects and people around him. He argues anything that can be doubted should be treated as false. The term knowledge to Descartes means an event or occurrence that is true. Knowledge requires certainty, and without that certainty, it cannot exist. Descartes’ dream hypothesis and evil demon hypothesis show that anything in our world can be fabricated.…

    • 1509 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. Compare and contrast the views of John Searle and Rene Descartes on dualism.is composed of two substances: mind and body. One is physical and one is non-phyical. Rene Descartes views on dualism are known as substance and simple dualism. He believed that reality was composed of two substances, one being the mind which consists of inmaterial thing such as thoughts and emotions.…

    • 1383 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Meditations of First Philosophy, Descartes explains philosophical meditations written over six days. The Second Meditation concerns the nature of the human mind. Descartes argues that the human mind is better known than the body. A major claim of his is his most famous quote “I think, therefore I am,” meaning a thinking thing, such as himself, can exist. In this essay, I will prove that Descartes’ argument in the Second Meditation for his existence as a thinking thing is convincing.…

    • 1180 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Upon reading Smart, Putman, Descartes, and Ryle’s excerpts, I have come to believe that my mind is a physical substance of me, such as a brain. Your mental process is often called brain processes just as Smart believes through the identity theory. I also agree with Smart in the way that mental states can be physically recognized through pain, which is often called the functionalist view. Lastly, I favor the behaviorism view in which Ryle explains how mental processes are intellectual acts. On the other hand, many people believe the mind is not a physical substance.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The argument in Descartes’ Sixth Meditation for the real distinction between the mind and the body ultimately secures his dualist position. Despite his argument appearing to make some mildly questionable leaps and seemingly ignore one potentially devastating point altogether, his position is clear and strong. I will begin by reconstructing Descartes’ argument, cover the grievances listed above, and then hope to argue that, despite these objections, Descartes’ position remains a sound metaphysical view. In the Sixth Meditation, Descartes begins by declaring that, firstly, all things one can clearly and distinctly perceive can be created by God, and secondly, if one can clearly and distinctly perceive one thing without calling to mind another,…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In contrast, dualist theorists, such as Plato and Descartes, hold that man is composed of two utterly distinct substances. In dualism, the mind and the body are not only different but they exist separately of each other. They are “as different and distinct as the…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Jessica Eustache Dr. Christopher Stabile 6/1/17 PHI2010-2175-4877 A2: Reading/Discussion Questions Assignment 2 John Searle’s View on dualism is the body shares the same nature as the mind but they are not alike. John's theory is called “supervenience”. Rene Descartes Faith live in substance dualism. To Desecrate our existence is produced by the mind and the body, the mind is non-physical and the body being physical. In comparison, both of these philosophers studied the connection between the mental and material.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    However, upon a closer and more rigorous examination, it is revealed that this argument is not as unsubstantiated as it seems to be. In order to understand how Descartes justifies his assertion, the concept of “clear and distinct idea” needs to be understood. Descartes’ “clear and distinct idea” involves the argument that an idea becomes clear when sharp intellectual perception is applied to it, similar to how a physical object becomes visually clear when sharp visual perception is applied to the physical object. Furthermore, the idea is distinct if it is not only clear but also excludes all other ideas that does not belong to it (Skirry). Thus, Descartes argued that the body is distinct from the mind because, after applying acute intellectual perception, Descartes perceived that the idea of the mind excludes the idea of body and the idea of the body excludes the idea of the mind therefore the mind is separate and different from the body (Skirry).…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays