Cooperative Federalism

Superior Essays
In order to understand where public policy comes from, we must first understand how the government is set up. When Congress was first set up, it had limited powers: wage war, make peace, enter into treaties and alliances, appoint and receive ambassadors, regulate Indian affairs and create a postal system (Bowman & Kearney, 2014, p. 29) . This, however, set up the opportunities for states to disagree. Shortly after, the states got together to create a first of its kind system of government in an attempt to keep each other accountable and named it Federalism. It created a dual federalism system of government where there were very distinct and separate responsibilities between the national and state governments (Bowman & Kearney, 2014, p. 39). After the Great Depression, however, it evolved into a cooperative federalism system. Yet, even while under this system, the federal government understood there were concerns intertwined between states and the federal government and since 1964, the system evolved again and formed a …show more content…
Yet, even if everyone has the same agenda, different proposals to implement might hinder any form of policy from coming to fruition. Then, some issues don’t even make it to the agenda. This is especially true in recent years where due to the extremes now held by the two highest parties, very liberal democrats and extremely conservative republicans, and how they happen to control the US House (GOP) and the Senate (Democrat), productivity is, in fact, at an all-time low (Scott, 2014) . Since the Great Recession, the national gridlock has promoted what is known as the Metropolitan Revolution where localities are taking back some of the power the national government once took from them. Even though they agree that there is gridlock, Bowman and Kearney argue that this is a voluntary shift of power from the top to the bottom; however, Katz and Bradley paint a very different

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Despite the fact that the Constitution was written based on Federalist theories, it still allowed some power to rest only in the hands of the state government. This made American citizens content in the United States’ newly established…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Political Ineffectiveness

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Democrats continued to expand their control in the House of Representatives, and a nearly filibuster proof majority was established in the Senate, creating what is referred to as a “supermajority”. Despite all of this, the rise of the Tea Party Movement in 2008, caused a rapid shift in public opinion, and this electorate influence was observed once again in Congress. Republicans won 63 new seats, and again took control of the House in 2010, making John Boehner their speaker. These newcomers came in with the intent of fighting Obama’s agenda, and it is here we observe the growth in partisanship. But as thoroughly discussed, it is not solely this partisanship that results in the exhausted forms of gridlock – instead what must be evaluated is the combination of this…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dual Federalism, also referred to as a commercial republic, is the system of government that shared fundamental governmental powers between the federal and state governments. It was called a commercial republic because programs were built to facilitate commerce, such as the Panama Canal and the sale of low-priced land. “It protected patents and provided for a common currency, which encouraged and facilitated enterprises and to expand (WTP 82)”. These programs that were built to facilitate commerce encouraged businesses and the economy to grow, which promoted western settlement. Dual federalism separated powers between the national and state governments, which allowed for economic growth through nationally defined programs.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Federalism Analysis

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Reading Response #1 The modern foundation of Federalism is grounded in the Constitution. However, there is no central definition of Federalism found in this document. Erwin Chemerinsky in Reconceptualizing federalism (2005) suggests federalism in the 1990’s and the early 21st century is defined by, “both the Supreme Court and Congress … restricting federal authority for the sake of protecting states ' autonomy”. These rules define the scope of authority available to the federal, state, and local agencies—what they can do by law—and they provide a framework to govern relationships between and among agencies.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first, under the Articles of Confederation, the leaders wanted a government based on popular sovereignty, which was by the people-for the people. Because these leaders had just come out of such tight control under the rule of Great Britain, the states didn’t want to give the government too much power. This gave the majority of the power to the states. However, the political leaders soon realized that individual state governments weren’t working and decided to change the rule of the government once more. Now the country shifted to a strong central government with a bicameral legislature of a congress with the Senate and the House of Representatives.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These government actions add on to the dysfunction that plagues the country today because these elements lead to political gridlock. Although the United States dysfunction is growing Douglas argues that there is a solution to polarization. Several reforms must be put into process: elimination of gerrymandering in congressional districts, application of term limits for unfit office holders, and alteration of the congressional work week to promote in-work relationships (Douglas). Douglass also adds that respect, cooperation, pragmatism, and civility must be used daily by politicians I order to eliminate the polarization that has turned our current government to one of the worst of all time. “Polarization alone doesn’t inevitably lead to deep dysfunction” states Ornstein.…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Government Shutdown

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Growing up in America today, one might formulate an image of a U.S. Senator or Congressman as a dignified statesman, willing to reason and compromise with colleagues from the other side of the aisle in an effort to improve the wellbeing of the country. This is largely due to historical representations of the Founders and subsequent important figures learned in elementary and middle school courses, as well as depictions found in various classic movies and television shows. However, upon reaching the age at which newspapers and serious newscasts become interesting to us, we soon realize that these representations are quite false. Indeed, today, the lack of willingness to compromise on any number of important issues has led to unprecedented gridlock…

    • 1335 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Balancing Act: A look into America’s Political Structure The United States is built on the concept of federalism. Federalism is “the division of power between a central government and regional governments” (Janda 69). Federalism creates a limited government by creating a strong federal government but also granting power to the states. By allocating powers between the states and federal government, federalism prevents either of them from becoming too powerful.…

    • 391 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery has been one of the most talked about subjects in history. It is a significantly important in our history. The Antebellum period was known for many reform movements. Slavery supported the economy of the United States, the nation went from underdeveloped farmers to becoming a driving force financially. It influenced important leaders, which eventually lead to war.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Federal versus State governments hasn’t been equal since the writing of the Constitution and is still going on present day. The state and Federal governments have been affecting lives since the beginning. The constitution granted the Federal government with more superior powers, while the state governments have the lower side of powers compared to the federal. There has been a court case which reduced the states powers, Such as in Sturges v. Crownshield, where the chief justice John Marshall let the states pass bankruptcy laws but couldn’t be applied to debts brought upon oneself before the ratification of the law. John Marshall had many cases which reduced the power of the states.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    "The national government has certain implied powers that go beyond its enumerated powers. " Through the constitution more powers were given to the national government rather than split equally between the states and the federal government. Over time the United States has built up a federal system that was meant to divide the power among the government and the states. Through different types of federalism the power between them shifted.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Conflict between the President and Congress Efren Arambula Texas A&M International University The Conflict between the President and Congress Public policy is generally a plan of action adopted by the government to solve a social problem. The American Recovery and Reinvestment and American Jobs Acts was established Franklin Delano Roosevelt; therefore, it was his answer to resolving the Great Depression. Emergency agendas anticipated to influence the financial activity, and it required national and state governments to collaborate (Berry, Goldman, Janda, Manna, and Schildkraut, 2016). The national government proposed money to back up state relieve struggles and states were frequently obligated donate their own money to management and administration (Berry et al, 2016). President Obama was the only thing keeping American together, and we are going to die with the current dictator, 45.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These two arguments have unalike mind sets on how they view Federalism. Federalism is a when a system of government is controlled by two different types of government. This is a governmental change that needed to be implicated back during this time for an at ease running government. For instance, within the government there will be two groups that control certain parts this divides it up, likewise with making things easier for people. These two articles are total opposites of each other.…

    • 336 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This means that it has a compound form of government, combining a central/federal government with a regional/state government. The division of power between these two is dictated by the nation’s constitution. The US constitution dictates that the Federal Government has the power to coin money, declare war, conduct foreign relations, and oversee foreign and interstate trade. In contrast, the State Government has the power to ratify amendments, manage public health & safety, oversee trade within the state, and educational issues. In addition, both share the power to make & enforce laws, tax, and borrow money.…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Anti-federalist correctly pointed out that the Constitution granted the federal courts an abundance of power, at the expense of the state and local courts. They wanted equal representation and supported implementing the Bill of Rights into the constitution for guaranteed protection of individual and natural rights. So when deciding to support Federalism or Anti-Federalism I choose Anti-federalism. Not only do I concur with the inclusion of the Bill of Rights and its necessity but I would have also side with them on senators and presidents being directly elected by the people.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays