TANF recipients are using EBT (electronic benefit transfer) cards to make purchases at bars and strip clubs. Using taxpayer’s money to pay for another’s drug habit is a restriction on autonomy. Testing welfare recipients prevents harm. Therefore, we should test recipients for drug use. Russell’s argument has good points, but his logic is hard to follow.…
SNAP and Drug Felons The author states that “a just distribution of goods, opportunities and liberties is the one that produces the greatest amount of welfare” (Hinman, pg. 227). Welfare is something that as a people we have provided to the poor throughout the centuries. Wealthy people and churches provided aid to the needy since the 17th century” (Mandell and Schram, pg. 33). By the 1930’s the American Government had assumed control and began to oversee welfare programs in America” (Mandell and Schram, pg. 33).…
The debate on whether welfare recipients should be randomly drug tested is ongoing and both sides are valid. Those all for this idea state that it is unfair we pay tax for this assistance and some abuse it yet those who oppose state that it stereotypes those who receive welfare are using drugs, it is a waste of money and an invasion of privacy. People who are for the idea of drug testing welfare recipients agree that they should not have to pay tax and have it being abused by drug users and to a certain extent that is reasonable, yet the amount of drug users between people who receive welfare and the rest of the population is equal or less. In addition to that, testing welfare recipients is more a burden than anything as the amount of money…
Testing welfare receivers could be a great way to help states save money and create new projects that could potentially create more jobs. According to (SV Herald) it is estimated that the states could save 1.7 million dollars by taking people off welfare that use it for illegal uses (thedailycourgar). Of course with the states kicking the people off of welfare who are abusing it can also open up opportunities for those who are really in need of the assistance. Drug testing is a real chance for the states to start enforcing the rules of the assistance and cracking down on those who are abusing it and don’t truly need it. Drug testing is a great way to help the states and government save money.…
Drug Courts Drug courts are here to help those in need and establish a better society for this country. The first drug court began in Florida in 1989 because there was a lot of drug cases that were similar to each other, so instead of wasting the judge’s time, the government decided to create drug courts (History). Drug courts was a positive effect to this country, however, many people still do not like this idea of having a drug court. Drug courts has caused many arguments which created two sides, the side who are for drug courts and the side who are against drug courts; there are not many people who feel neutral about this certain situation.…
Exploring the views of those who are for welfare drug testing have many reasons why it 's a "good idea. " For some jobs one must agree to either get randomly drug tested throughout…
In The University Of Pennsylvania Journal Of Constitutional Law, Celia Goetzl agrees: “Such policies stereotype, stigmatize, and criminalize the poor without cause” (2013, p.1541). Studies support the assertion that applicants for welfare are no more likely to have substance abuse issues than are the general public. Moreover, problems that have arisen with drug testing results due to faulty testing and results. According to Pollack, et al, “Suspicionless, population-based chemical testing of welfare recipients will detect some “true positives” who are drug-dependent, a greater number of “accidental positives” with complex psychological problems, and a larger group of “false positives” who have no apparent psychiatric (including drug-related) disorder” (2002, p. 30). In this study conducted over two a year span, “the categories of “false positives,” and “accidental positives” each outnumbered the “true positives”” (Pollack, Danziger, Jayakody, Seefeldt, 2002).…
The American Public Health Association(APHA) is responsible for the health and wellbeing of our country. As a prime source for “[protecting]...the health of people and communities where they live, learn work, and play” (APHA), we must trust them with the matter of the illegal drug abuse. The APHA promotes “healthy decisions” and should be able to aid victims, whom are unable to exist or grow for themselves. While each drug result in different side effects and hazards, how would we know or measure the knowledge of our justice system of illegal drugs such as cocaine, heroin, or/and methamphetamine. Therefore, personal growth, autonomy, healthy relationships, and physical health are initial for the wellbeing of our communities and our citizens.…
$1 trillion annually are spent throughout all 83 government assistance programs. All people receiving government assistance should be drug tested randomly to prove that they truly need the help and that they are not just using and abusing the system. Welfare is government programs that help and provide money and…
There is quite a lot of controversy and heated discussions in our country relating to drug testing for welfare recipients. As of November 10, 2015, thirteen states, Alabama, Arkansas, Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Utah have passed laws for drug screening or testing for public assistance. Another nineteen states, including Ohio, have proposed legislation requiring some form of drug testing. In 2011, Florida passed a law that required every single applicant for TANF (The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) to pass a urine drug test. In some states, recipients of welfare benefits have already taken the programs to court because the recipients feel their rights…
Drug Testing Athletes All over the United States there has been great controversy about whether or not there should be drug testing in schools. The drug testing topic became even more popular when the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in favor of drug testing not being unconstitutional (Bowman). There has been many court cases such as Vernonia v. Acton (Proctor 1336), Earls v. Tecumseh (Yamaguchi, Johnston, and O’Malley 3) and Schaill v. Tippecanoe (Yamaguchi, Johnston, and O’Malley 2) that debate whether or not schools should drug test their athletes. The National Institute on Drug Abuse had a study which proved that drug use is increasing all over the United States (Proctor 1335).…
Supporting the illegal behaviors will not only cost the state current funds but future funds as the effects of illegal drug use are felt by those involved. Examples of these effects are jail time, poor health conditions and or death which will again, cost the government additional funds. Requiring those requesting and receiving government assistance to pass drug tests would not only benefit the state and federal governments, the community, but the families…
You 're driving home after a long day at work, you look in your review mirror and hear the sirens: a cop is pulling you over. Now you 're sweating because you have 24 grams of weed in the cup holder. The cop begins to search your vehicle; finds the marijuana, and let 's you go. This scenario, is an example of what would happen if drugs were decriminalized in America. Contrary to this, would decriminalizing drugs in America have a negative effect on the nation, or an adverse one?…
The argument on whether drugs should be legalized has been going on for so long now. Some people say as an Americans we have the right to choose whether we want to do drugs or not. It is really hard to control the consumption of drugs, because people are going to do them whether they are legal or illegal. Other people say that the laws that are being enforced now are good to control drugs. “There will also be more unpublicized fatal and maiming crashes, more job accidents, more child neglect, more of everything associated with substance abuse”(M. Kendrecke).…
Major companies in many different sectors all support, and spend money lobbying for, the continued criminalization of drugs. The continued criminalization of drugs is critical to the drug war, and includes strict punishments and sentences for those convicted of crimes involving drugs. It has been shown that groups such as private prisons, and prison guard unions lobby for strict punishments to increase incarceration, and reap the profits. These company’s contributions promote the war on drugs, by giving the state no incentive to scale back their policies. What many fail to realize, however, is the impact the war on drugs and subsequent policies has internationally.…