Drones Research Paper

Improved Essays
The article discusses that, the drones are rising in every field due to modern scientific world. Every individual is using drone for his/her own work. In every sector of an organization like from framers to police investigating a crime need a drone as well as a director for making film need a drone. The drone use is rising every year. The U.S drone attacked is increasing every year in East Asian countries. Many Asian people are losing their life due to the drone attack. “Since President Obama takes a charge the U.S has attacked around 300 covert drones in Pakistan and Yemen, in which thousands of people lose their life.” Says Grossmanon in Time. It is estimated that nearly thousands civilians were killed in Pakistan only, including many small …show more content…
Although the drone attack against the Taliban militants have increased during 2020 the number of related civilian’s causalities has fallen due to the number of drone attack. The land battle in the Afghanistan grinds on, but the drone war is taking its speed, which is brought in war by the war soldiers. The author’s says “ the U.S have been reported 62 drones attack against the Taliban and affiliated groups in Pakistan in 2010, compare with 53 strikes in 2009 and 35 in 2008.” Due to the varying divinations of the civilians in different geography many civilians lose their life in the attack. Peter Bergen of the New American Foundation, thinks as many as 300 civilians may have killed only in 2009. “Why the drop?” Says Bergen. The griffin name Hellfire attacked in the Pakistan by the U.S army takes a life of many innocent people including the children and women. A jihadi in Pakistan tells the Newsweek that “predator fire two missiles, one is like a big bomb, which destroy everything including building, and tears people into small pieces and other is smaller, killing only those in the immediate way. “The reports from Pakistan’s treble area suggest that there have been three or four predator strikes, which is as many as 18 missiles at a time since June 2009 resulting in death of the many people.” Say the authors in the article. Politically, the decrease in the civilian’s deaths makes the …show more content…
The drone has capability of remaining in air for long period of time until the target is detected. “The U.S Air Force started deploying its drone since November 2001.” Says O’Connell in America. Killing a target with drones makes easy for operate, even a target is far beyond from you. The U.S Army started deploying its drone in Middle East since 2003 during the first invasion in Iraq and also in the different African nations like Somalia, Congo resulting in the death of many individuals and also the terrorists. The right to kill by drone in Pakistan, under the United Nations Charter, resort to military force on the terror of another state is permitted only when the attacking state is self-defensed to an armed attack.” “A pilot of fighter jet flies over the place where the attack will occur and risks being shot down by terrorists but a flying drones pilot never experience the place where the attack occurs and knows he or she is in no place of danger” says O’Connell in America. Thus, for being safety from the ground missile, different country are making their own drone. The article state “The United States drone attack has risen in the East Asian countries more than any other country, due to large number in terrorist like al-Qaeda, ISIS and different Taliban’s group in those countries.” The rise in number should be decreased. If it is made, it should be made for the welfare of people for their good not

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Drone warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide safety for Americans against al-Qaeda. Rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the country, the use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals ethical? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem unmoral. Kenneth Anderson, however, provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective with his tone, organization, use of quotes, and appeal to logic in his article, “The Case for Drones.”…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States should stop using drones because it kills innocent people, it can be hacked and it crashes a lot. Civilians who have nothing to do with the war or terrorism gets killed by drones. Author states that, “The Bureau of Investigative journalism, a U.K. nonprofit, estimates that since 2004, CIA drone…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to a report by Andrew Blake for the Washington Times, “drone strikes conducted by the United States during a 5-month-long campaign in Afghanistan caused deaths of unintended targets nearly nine out of ten times” (Blake, 2015) In addition to that, Ofek argues that, “when innocents are inadvertently killed, drone strikes can foment public anger and increase the popularity of militants.” He adds, “Everyone of these dead noncombatants represents an alienated family, a new desire for revenge, and more recruits for a militant movement that has grown exponentially even as drone strikes has increased” (Ofek, 2010) This adds another layer of criticism against the drone strike program and the validity of Hayden’s arguments. From this perspective, on top of the lack of precision of the technology which could either result in missing the intended target, killing innocent civilians, or both, it can also cause grievance within the bereaved families of civilians killed by the strikes, which could then add to the threat of terrorist attacks which the drones aimed to deter in the first…

    • 1531 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The key piece in shredding this myth apart, however, would be the usage of drones to create a technological warfare in which unmanned aircraft carriers would be used to attack intended targets. It also goes without saying that although the technology used requires human input as well which can lead to catastrophic disasters such as the Afghanistan hospital which was hit by a drone strike killing doctors and children or the amount of civilian casualties that have skyrocketed since the implementation of the drones. This section of the paper will detail the Obama administration’s usage of drones over the course of his two terms in office, the statistics of how many deaths there have been using this technology as well as legal responses to events such as the bombings of hospitals and the supposed ever-expanding kill list of the Obama administration.…

    • 1602 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone strikes are cheaper than engaging in ground or manned aerial combat. Drone strikes are legal under international law. Drone strikes are legal under US law. Drones limit the scope and scale of military action. Drone strikes are subject to a strict review process and congressional oversight.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones have inculcated the fear of only aiding in the short term. With claims that they are creating more enemies than defeating them. The strong counter point against drones is that they will cause a major “blowback”. A drone blowback will essentially cause the creation of new insurgents that will retaliate against the United States to further destabilizing Pakistan. The want to stick to old traditions of bringing the fight face to face to the enemy, and capturing them to interrogate, is an ideal thought.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Joint Committee on Human Rights published a report on drone strikes discussing the legal justification used to defend the use of drone strikes. This report is clear…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones strikes and drones don’t help people feel any safer and are the true terrorist against civilians. How the CIA and JSOC use drones aren't a legal way to use the drones and are a violation against Human and political rights. Drones are a violation to International Covenant and Political rights by killing people suspected to be a terrorist. “According to top secret intelligence reports reviewed by…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You live in Syria, your hometown is taken over by terrorists. As if the terroristic violence is enough, you constantly hear the roar of drones invading the skies. At work with your co-workers and at home with your families, every second of the day you ponder upon the question, “Am I next?”. Target drone strikes create even more unnecessary fear in neighborhoods taken over by terrorists. We should stop trying to end terrorism with lethal force such as drone strikes.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aggressive Drone Warfare

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As of April 7, 2016 there were several drone strikes in Khost, Afghanistan that killed 17 civilians when people tried to get the bodies from the first strike, another missile was fired killing more civilians, and after that more civilians were killed by a third and final strike (Mangal and Mashal 2016). This is a perfect example how the use of drone warfare is too aggressive in Afghanistan. The first missile never struck the appropriate target and yet more missiles were fired without any confirmation on if the appropriate target had been struck or not (Mangal and Mashal 2016). The United States cannot continue to fire missiles from drones carelessly without absolute confirmation of who they are firing on. If this aggressive drone policy continues in…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones In Brave New World

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Cracking the Technology Code Watching television with family on a black and white screen is where it all began. FaceTiming friends, texting, and flying drones is where the world will see technology die off. Or is it only the beginning? Take a closer look at where technology has brought the world up to this point today.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drone strikes help protect the peace in our free world by taking out certain individuals who threaten it. Drone strikes on the leaders and fighters fall under legal authority, which makes them legal and necessary. The United States has the jurisdiction to use self-defense and target ISIS fighters that pose a threat to their national security (Groves). Therefore, makes these drone strikes perfectly legal, and in no violation of international law. U.S. drones have killed an estimated 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban, and other jihadist operatives in Pakistan and Yemen (Byman).…

    • 1975 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Those who are sceptical about the drones and other autonomous weapons can also make an argument against it using fairness. As drones are operated from a different continent, the operator is not risking his or her own life; the only risk is the risk of losing or destroying the drone. It may be unfair, because the people on the armed conflict territories risk their lives so it is unfair to them. Additionally, more developed countries have more choice of weapons, which may be also much more advanced than the weapons available, for example in Pakistan. Pakistan is poorer country than the U.S. so their means to defend themselves are weaker comparing to the means of the attackers with hundreds of drones loaded with the newest technology and sensors available all around the world.…

    • 1003 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Armed Drones

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The U.S. military has been using armed drones that have many bugs and glitches in warfare that may create more problems. The issue about drones is that they are meant to eliminate terrorists but they don't all the time because they kill civilians on accident as well. They drones could potentially The U.S. military should not be able to use armed drones until they have proved that the drones have no glitches or bugs and can successfully take out a terrorist without harming a citizen. Drones should be studied more before use because of these deaths. Drones eliminate terrorists but do not get them all the time so that could lead to them killing a civilian or evan a child, studies show that “174 to 1,1047 civilians have been killed”.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Drone Strikes

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Since 9/11, the United States has been using drones in the Middle East to fight the war of terror. In the article “Machineries of Death” states, since 2004 in Pakistan alone, U.S. Drones have killed between 423 and 962 civilians, at least 172 of them children. However, this is not addressing the real problem against terror because the lives of innocent people are being sacrifice. The use of drones is a crude way of handling this problem for the simple reason that is wrong and inhuman. Target strikes are usually based on doubtful information, which creates more problems because it’s usually based on self-interest by the opposing time.…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays