Cia's Argument Against The Fairness Of Drones In Pakistan

Improved Essays
Those who are sceptical about the drones and other autonomous weapons can also make an argument against it using fairness. As drones are operated from a different continent, the operator is not risking his or her own life; the only risk is the risk of losing or destroying the drone. It may be unfair, because the people on the armed conflict territories risk their lives so it is unfair to them. Additionally, more developed countries have more choice of weapons, which may be also much more advanced than the weapons available, for example in Pakistan. Pakistan is poorer country than the U.S. so their means to defend themselves are weaker comparing to the means of the attackers with hundreds of drones loaded with the newest technology and sensors available all around the world.

It is also worth mentioning that the critics’ arguments include the privacy issues. One of the main functions of drones is surveillance. This surveillance provides CIA with scans of the buildings, high-resolution photos of
…show more content…
Most of civilians may be unaware of being watched if there is one drone flying around the area and still the information about them is being gathered without their knowledge and consent. The CIA’s argument is that they have to gather information to correctly identify the suspect and based on this information decide whether to strike or not. How the information gathering works puts a shadow on it because when there are innocent civilians dead, including children, because of the information gathered, the CIA is doing it wrong.

The Pakistan Court is one that ruled CIA drone strikes as an illegal war crime. Before the Peshawar High Court ruled the illegality of the CIA drone strikes , the United Nations fact found that such drone strikes are in the violation of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Military Drones

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many people are worried the military may begin to use drones on U.S. soil, while others believe it undermines democracy due to the fact that a drone strike doesn’t require authorization from Congress. Further exploring this issue and into the problems…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    And a current example with North Korea- their leader and government doesn’t reason well and the U.S doesn’t know if or when they may launch a nuclear missile on the U.S. They have threatened the U.S before with missile threats and so it may be easier to declare war on them so the U.S has a chance at winning instead of the chance of getting bombed. On the other hand, declaring war on North Korea would probably cause the death of a lot of innocent people, which is a bad…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Should Drones Be Banned

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are unmanned aerial vehicles that have a variety of purposes. Those purposes range from peaceful aerial photography and recreation to uses in war and terror. With such a range of uses, many fear for the worse and think that regulations aren’t enough and that drones should be banned from private use. But their uses in farming, law enforcement, and recreation have showed promise over the last few years. Even though some believe that they should be banned, in reality the good outways the bad and the private use of drones should not be banned.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Men would not purposely fly a plane into a tower, only with the goal of killing thousands of innocent people in mind. Traditional warfare no longer exists. Asymmetric warfare takes its place. In order to win, one must fight with asymmetric means. Why should America risk its citizens to go “courageously” and politely kill an extremist who does not think twice about hiding behind a women and her child?…

    • 892 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    However they do the exact opposite. Intelligence used to choose targets for drone strikes is not concrete. In a video on AJ+ Takruri says, “First the intel used to decide who to target, especially in countries where the United States is not officially at war, is frequently based on flimsy evidence”. (AJ+, 00:20)Drone strikes do not make a safer world because the people that we are killing may be innocent. As well as flimsy evidence, most of the people killed by drone strikes are not targets.…

    • 1698 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the motive does not make sense, then the rest of the assertions about the conspiracy surrounding the assassination also start to fall apart. The assassination of John F. Kennedy is a confusing thing. If there was only a lone gunman, then the shot that he pulled off was nothing short of amazing. If there are no secrets surrounding the assassination, then why has the government not released the classified documents concerning the assassination? There are questions to be asked about the assassination, but there is also a right way to ask them, and asserting that everything the government tells the public is a lie, and that vast conspiracies are behind many major events in United States history, via a mainstream Hollywood movie is not the way to ask those questions.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no real need for nuclear missiles, contrary to many people’s beliefs. People think they protect us, but really just put us at more risk of attack. All they really do, besides level whole metropolitan areas in a few seconds, is harbor a false sense of security for the politicians to hide behind. They state that they will protect our country with these weapons of mass destruction, but it’s all just an elaborate ploy to get innocent voters to put them in power of these armageddon machines. Many people think that nuclear weapons protect them, but in reality they put them at more risk of nuclear attack.…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Military Robots

    • 2482 Words
    • 10 Pages

    While the United States have been successful in this regard, many worry about the use of drones because they often result in a high number of civilian causalities. Because of this, action should be taken by the government to ensure that the number of civilian causalities are reduced during drone strikes. Because Congress has already funded research efforts concerning drones, Congress should spend additionally funds to research the areas that will be subject to drone strikes to ensure that a drone strike will not result in an excessive amount of civilian causalities. Also, there is fear that if drones can be used instead of human soldiers, then countries will be less likely to find peaceful alternatives to violence. There must be legislature passed to ensure that drones, and all other types of violent activities, are used as a last resort—after all other efforts to resolve conflict peacefully have been exhausted.…

    • 2482 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Overy Murders

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The entire book was pretty much asking the question which one outweighed the other. Did the many unsuccessful and inaccurate bombings prove necessary in order to hit such few targets? The most controversial theme recurring in the book was the question of whether or not they had an impact on the war. Overy felt very strongly that the people who were in charge were waging a war that was sinking their own military instead of having any sort of effect on the enemy. With the constant manufacturing of the bombs and other airplanes being built, results of the bombings did not help the cause.…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, when drones cause collateral damage, such as killing civilians and damaging civilian property, the opinions of civilians decrease even more so. Additionally, some cultures believe the use of drones as not brave and cold hearted. As a result, drones are sometimes counterproductive by more destabilizing some regions. Drone warfare is very easy to control as it is similar as a video game, drone warfare makes combat too easy by diminishing ethical decisions. The worst case scenario is when drones or a fleet of drones have been commandeered or taken control by the rival.…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays