Drone Warfare Argumentative Essay

Superior Essays
Rubble collapses under the feet of children as they examine the wreckage, fire and smoke scatter throughout the area, mothers beckon their children to come inside, and shock stretches across the faces of natives. Why and what for? Uses of military drones have faced many fiery debates in recent times. Articles and open letters, some with biased information about the reality of drone warfare and its effects, recently started causing uproar, despite years of drone usage in the military. Doyle McManus, a columnist for the Los Angeles Times, wrote an opinion piece on the drawbacks of drone warfare. As a Middle Eastern correspondent for the LA Times, McManus’s insight in the drone warfare debate exponentially outweighs many out there. One of McManus’s …show more content…
For instance, he states, “After a decade of drone strikes, (it notes,) we face more Islamic extremists, not fewer.” Casual relationships like this need hard evidence and statistics to back it up. Increases in Islamic extremism could have numerous causes, such as economic reliance, relative conditions and inter-related relationship, and many other unimaginable reasons. To say that the increase of Islamic extremists directly relates to the increase of drone strikes can seem far-reaching at the very least. Additionally, McManus believes it cowardly to hide behind a drone when killing extremists. Saying that this way of fighting does not follow traditional warfare. He would prove correct in that statement. In traditional warfare, men would not take shelter in Mosques to avoid death, knowing that Americans respect religious and sacred ground. Men would not take human shields to avoid gunfire. Men would not purposely fly a plane into a tower, only with the goal of killing thousands of innocent people in mind. Traditional warfare no longer exists. Asymmetric warfare takes its place. In order to win, one must fight with asymmetric means. Why should America risk its citizens to go “courageously” and politely kill an extremist who does not think twice about hiding behind a women and her child? McManus also believes that the CIA should release a list of names, so the …show more content…
People need to understand the gruesomeness of war, and that death and destruction create a pathway for peace. Without the extensive measures of drones, the war in the Middle East would have a much different scenario. Extremist would still roam take human shields and hide in Mosques, sacrificing the lives of natives and risk the lives of Americans. While many still do, drones have reduced a number of them. Ultimately, drone strikes effectively eliminate Islamic extremists, and in turn eliminate threats in the Middle East and protect American

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Drone Strikes

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Target strikes are usually based on doubtful information, which creates more problems because it’s usually based on self-interest by the opposing time. “At Issue: Targeted Strikes” article notes, “that target strikes violate international law because they are being used outside of combat zones.” In Yemen, innocent women and children are being killed by drone strikes which U.S. official calls Al Quada or terrorist. The problem with this is that the United States acts as superior leaving many civilians in the Middle East to dislike…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aggressive Drone Warfare

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drone Warfare: The United States and their Aggressive Drone Policy in Afghanistan The United States has shifted its military strategies for taking out foreign enemies by reducing the number of boots they put on the ground and increasing the use of unmanned aerial vehicles referred to as drones. The use of drones is effective at sparing the number of U.S. soldiers and pilots being sent to deal with terrorist organizations (Grayson 2016). However it is ineffective in reducing the number of civilians that are killed or wounded through the use of these counterinsurgency strategies (Khalili 2012). This essay argues that the current U.S. drone policy in the country of Afghanistan is too aggressive and is doing more harm than good. Several incidents…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argument Against Drones

    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages

    After the attack, they were unsure who was killed (25). These machines are immoral death planes that instill fear among children and destroy the land of countries. The United State government should refrain from using this technology until it has become advanced enough that the murder of innocent civilians is abolished. Is the sacrifice of numerous innocent lives worth the price of killing one,…

    • 1280 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    this has pro and cons as it demolish terrorist territories/ structure but at the same time it cause hundreds of innocents casualties in the country side. However, this statement is ironic to all those Americans who are serving their country. Furthermore, there is another strong emotional appeal "we condemn terror and terrorism, but we want clear definition of terrorism" . (Afghan paper calls on USA to define what terrorism is,2007, paragraph 8). This is a point of view of entire Muslim society and it condemn all terrorist attack against non-Muslims and Muslims.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Khalid Sheikh Mohammed the logic of war Basically war is a conflict between two sovereign countries or a fight for independent. War has negative impact over the society. If there is war between two countries, people get killed, hungry, and there is no development. Selfishness is the most reason of war, on the other hand some people involve on war to get their independent. Mohammed claims there is language behind any war.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stop Isis Essay

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We need to get involved in stopping ISIS so we can have normal lives without being scared about what they might do. Some think we do not need boots on the ground in foreign countries but to stop them we are going to have to. We need to protect this country before it goes downhill even more. Getting involved on the war on terror is not only imperative for our standard way of living this also will protect our future. Williams states how ISIS is killing innocent and trying to kill off religious people "mass beheadings of Christians, children burned alive in cages, and the latest reports of apostasy being forced to lay over bombs buried in the sand" (Williams).…

    • 1174 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite being given terms of negotiation by the terrorists, they are ignored. Knowing that hundreds of lives that are on that plane can be saved by following negotiations that Levin claims to have been made are neglected, this proves that saving the lives of the passengers is not the main priority but punishing the terrorists through torture is. Another solution that Levin fails to address is that, an emergency landing could take place and all the passengers could be evacuated so nobody gets hurt. Levin states that “only [the terrorist] alone can disarm [the bomb],” this is not completely true there are people dedicated to disarming bombs called the bomb squad. They would be called on the scene immediately.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elliot Rodger killed people because he wanted to kill people. He had psychological problems. Even if at that time, the government already implemented gun control, Elliot Rodger would still kill people. Although Elliot Rodger cannot buy a gun, this cannot change his appetite that is kill people. Elliot Rodger would just change his weapon.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This would also lead to the death of more men. Thousands were killed and wounded in Iraq, and if there were an all out war those numbers would increase greatly.There is also little chance of fully extinguishing the ISIS movement. There will always be radicals looking to take advantage of instability in developing countries. We’ve seen it consistently throughout history and we will not cease to encounter it in the future. After years and billions pumped into annihilating Al Qaeda, They just shrunk out of the spotlight until they grew enough to be formidable once again.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Also other researches’ that were done by Gallup organization and Christian Science Monitor/TIPP has corresponded results. That means that the majority of the American supports the use of drones to fight terror. I therefore strongly addressed the Democrats, to stop fighting against the truth about the use of drones and join forces with the American government to fight terror in the world by the use of drones (Henderson, 2011). Even though they may have a counter argument that drones are unpopular to the affected countries, this is an upper hand to American to stop terror. Also, the counter argument of the Democrats is that they said that drones target militias and kills more civilians.…

    • 1786 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays