Essay On Drone Strikes

Improved Essays
Drone Strikes Foster New Enemies Since September 11, 2001, The United States has been using drones strikes against the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other terrorist groups. The Constitution requires that the government must go through a due process before making the decision of killing someone. Drone strikes are usually based on doubtful information, which ends up taking the life of innocent civilians. Civilians living in the Middle East are being killed because of mistaken identity, or for just being at the wrong place at the wrong time. Drone strikes are wrong because they kill innocent civilians violate due process, and result in blowback. The case in …show more content…
began using drones to help fight the war against terrorism. The use of the drone has helped the defense of the country to a certain extent. People claim drone strikes are a useful weapon in war because they kill the enemy without putting soldiers in danger. In the article “At Issue: Targeted Strikes” article notes, “Proponents credit drone strikes with the killing of many of top commanders of the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and argue that they are a legal form of self defense.” The benefit of this is that U.S. soldiers do not have to be in unfriendly locations exposing themselves to danger. “One advantage of drones is that they can be deployed for long periods of time over hostile territory until the location of a target is spotted ” (At Issue: Target Strikes, 2016). People claim that drone strikes help save the lives of many U.S. soldiers because it eliminates unnecessary gunfights. “ The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the bastard die for his” (General Patton) . A reason why people favor Drone strikes is because they are effective for weakening Al Qaeda, as well as other terrorizes …show more content…
Since 9/11, the United States has been using drones in the Middle East to fight the war of terror. In the article “Machineries of Death” states, since 2004 in Pakistan alone, U.S. Drones have killed between 423 and 962 civilians, at least 172 of them children. However, this is not addressing the real problem against terror because the lives of innocent people are being sacrifice. The use of drones is a crude way of handling this problem for the simple reason that is wrong and inhuman. Target strikes are usually based on doubtful information, which creates more problems because it’s usually based on self-interest by the opposing time. “At Issue: Targeted Strikes” article notes, “that target strikes violate international law because they are being used outside of combat zones.” In Yemen, innocent women and children are being killed by drone strikes which U.S. official calls Al Quada or terrorist. The problem with this is that the United States acts as superior leaving many civilians in the Middle East to dislike

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In his essay “In Defense of Drones: a historical argument,” David Bell defends the use of drones as a weapon from critics that doubt the moral and political implications of war “waged by one side without risk to the life and limb of its combatants.” Bell’s creates his arguments using comparisons, quotes, and facts. Bell’s first argument addresses the concern of drones “radically change[ing] the political dynamics of warfare” by comparing the purpose of drones to that of past weaponry. He states that the motivation of innovation in military technology has been, and still is, to “take out one’s enemies from a safe distance.”…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone Strikes

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Under international humanitarian law, the targeted persons must be directly playing a part in hostilities with the United States. Furthermore, the targeted persons must also pose an imminent threat that only lethal force can prevent (“Living Under Drones”). Simply being assumed to have a connection with a "militant" organization or under the United States policy of "signature" drone strikes is not legally appropriate to make someone a acceptable target for killing. Moreover, the United Nations ' Special Rapporteur on counter-terrorism, Human Rights Chief, and Special Rapporteur on summary, arbitrary, or extrajudicial executions have all labeled US drone strikes as a violation of sovereignty, and have pressed for investigations into the legality of the…

    • 916 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    United States should stop using drones because it kills innocent people, it can be hacked and it crashes a lot. Civilians who have nothing to do with the war or terrorism gets killed by drones. Author states that, “The Bureau of Investigative journalism, a U.K. nonprofit, estimates that since 2004, CIA drone…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drone strikes are cheaper than engaging in ground or manned aerial combat. Drone strikes are legal under international law. Drone strikes are legal under US law. Drones limit the scope and scale of military action. Drone strikes are subject to a strict review process and congressional oversight.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Ethics surrounding drone warfare has been a controversial debate that has not yet captured the full attention of the public in the west. The main arguments for using drone warfare has been about saving lives and cost, but such argument pales in comparison to the arguments against it. To examine the counter arguments of why drone warfare is ethically wrong, we must look at the political stance of the governments using drone warfare, the society’s responsibility, the ethics of the way that the drone strikes are conducted, the effectiveness of drone warfare and the international irresponsibility and unethical nature of drone strikes. Drone warfare saves the lives of soldiers by placing them out of harms way; this is one of the arguments for…

    • 1913 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Drones do not capture hard drives, organizational charts, strategic plans, or secret correspondence, and their tactical effectiveness is entirely dependent on the caliber of human intelligence on the ground.” “The drone campaign presents a fundamental challenge to U.S. national security law, as evidenced by the controversial killing of four American citizens in attacks in Yemen and Pakistan.” The use of drone strikes has allowed the president to be personally, “involved in putting together kill lists that can include…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones have inculcated the fear of only aiding in the short term. With claims that they are creating more enemies than defeating them. The strong counter point against drones is that they will cause a major “blowback”. A drone blowback will essentially cause the creation of new insurgents that will retaliate against the United States to further destabilizing Pakistan. The want to stick to old traditions of bringing the fight face to face to the enemy, and capturing them to interrogate, is an ideal thought.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones strikes don’t have any good outcomes on the war on terrorism all they do is cause problems. Drones are a violation certain laws like International Covenant on civil and Political Rights. There are no good outcomes from drone strikes the civilians are afraid of drones they are afraid of if the drone will kill them or not. When family is apart of collateral damage that's what causes people to be motivated to join the terrorist against the americans and their ideals.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    You live in Syria, your hometown is taken over by terrorists. As if the terroristic violence is enough, you constantly hear the roar of drones invading the skies. At work with your co-workers and at home with your families, every second of the day you ponder upon the question, “Am I next?”. Target drone strikes create even more unnecessary fear in neighborhoods taken over by terrorists. We should stop trying to end terrorism with lethal force such as drone strikes.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drones Research Papers

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The history of drones dates back the World War I and has come a long way in the use as surveillance as a military and civilian usage and can take us to the future with food and package delivery service. Some of which all could agree is good and others suggest as terrifying. If a drone is used to drop water to a stranded hiker, fight a fire or give a lifetime memory to a couple at their wedding then we smile and give support to drones. While on the other side we cringe at the thought of bombing a house or airfield that supports the war on termism. Drones are a unique machine that as any tool can be used for good and evil and is in the hands of those pressing the controls.…

    • 1356 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It would seem to be a never ending cycle. The more terrorists the US kills through targeted assassinations the more terrorists pop up. Drone strikes simply add more fuel to the fire, proving counterproductive to what they are trying to achieve - a world without terror. There is a sense of hypocrisy with drone strikes. By practicing targeted killings, it is counter to the core values and policies America stands in support for human rights and democratic freedoms (Kennedy 274).…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Aggressive Drone Warfare

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As of April 7, 2016 there were several drone strikes in Khost, Afghanistan that killed 17 civilians when people tried to get the bodies from the first strike, another missile was fired killing more civilians, and after that more civilians were killed by a third and final strike (Mangal and Mashal 2016). This is a perfect example how the use of drone warfare is too aggressive in Afghanistan. The first missile never struck the appropriate target and yet more missiles were fired without any confirmation on if the appropriate target had been struck or not (Mangal and Mashal 2016). The United States cannot continue to fire missiles from drones carelessly without absolute confirmation of who they are firing on. If this aggressive drone policy continues in…

    • 1948 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent news Paris, France was attacked by 8 terrorist, causing many deaths and countess injuries. The Unites States needs to continue the use of drones outside of the US for this very reason. The war on terror is in a full on rage do to ISIS and needs to be stopped. Drones have been used for a very long period of time, the first drones were used during the Civil War to gather intelligence, same as many modern drones. With the improvements in technology the drones we use today are equipped with weapons thermal imaging cameras.…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Using drones is the best way, in my opinion, to kill bad people. Drones are unmanned airplanes used to kill enemies. My first reason is the attacks are much cheaper than sending out manned aircraft, and my second reason is drone strikes are secretive. The United States should continue to use drones to kill bad people. First off, using drones is cheaper than sending out manned aircraft.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The amount of militants and high priority targets killed in drone attacks is nothing to look past; they are accomplishing what is needed to be done to help eliminate the war against terrorism. These drones are the driving force in the war against terrorism,…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays