Interstate Argumentative Analysis

Improved Essays
Throughout history we have seen many cases of rivalry and disputes amongst states. It is very common that within these conflicts and disagreements, states find something that will be of benefit for each other. This situation brings not only peace amongst them, but also cooperation. It does not matter the level of power that a state may have, at some point in time within their power, they have had to make some type of decision that is beneficial for both. Interstate cooperation is no different, for decisions benefitting internally are just as important.

Interstate cooperation occurs when exercisable political power is distributed between states and Congress (Zimmerman, pg. 203). Together, both the Congress and states must make negotiations
…show more content…
Since interstates must have beneficial negotiations, trade settlements are one of the most important decisions concerning both parties involved. Trade agreements are moved by the economy, for a mutual benefit, and tends to minimize interstate differences and conflict. Trade agreements are extremely important when one country has something that another wants and the other way around. “Trade or economic agreements raise interdependence between interstates in ways that are believed to reduce conflict between them” (Shaffer, pg. …show more content…
Feminism helps see how war affects and shapes woman’s lives. Feminism shows that not only men are affected by interstate differences but woman play a large part in it as well. Professor Cynthia Enloe provided us with two examples, Kim and Maha, of woman that were impacted by war in different ways. Professor Enloe explained that each woman was affected by war altogether since power and gender work together in the mist of war. Feminine theory helps us see situations, in this case war, differently or from an alternate lens (Viotti & Kauppi, pg. 360). Militarism shows the power within a state, but feminism shows a different perspective in analyzing war and the aftermath. These are the areas that are viewed as important and analyzed when making interstate collaboration for the good of the state and its

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    In the article, Catton briefly stated some comparison concerning Lee and Grant, as well. One of the similarities that he mention was they were both determined to end the war peacefully. This comparison can be proven when Catton stated, “To turn quickly from the war to peace once the fighting was over . . . in the end, help the two sections to become one nation again,” concerning Lee and Grant. These quotes support the author believes the main similarities between Lee and Grant was both two strong men physically and mentally to protect their people.…

    • 150 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay is going to be a argumentative essay about krakauer opinion of Chris McCandless. Krakauer mood changes throughout the book/story about how he feels about Chris he says a lot of stuff that he might disagrees and sometimes he agrees with him about it. Krakauer talk a lot of Chris because of the choices he made during the story and how he lived and how he tried to survive in the wild. I will also be talking about how he connects and the opposite of what he says about Chris McCandless. Krakauer didn't like Chris decisions about going in the wild because he was going to die there without any food or any place to stay or sleep or rest.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This became a major issue due to the fact that in order for NAGPRA to apply, Native American tribal groups must be able to provide evidence that the remains discovered had been buried on what was once or currently. Thus in the eyes of the Native American community, to deny their claims of being the descendants of the Kennewick man equates to denying their religion and traditions. (Jones 2005 cited by Sayer 2010: 112). This is due to the fact that according to oral tradition and religious beliefs, their ancestors were placed there over 10,000 years ago however the Supreme Court did not rule oral tradition as viable evidence of that particular tribe inhabiting the region at that time (Herman 2015: 181). Thus while NAGPRA was created to settle…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To accurately depict the overarching qualities of Northwestern which I find most intriguing, it is easiest to provide a line from the university’s president, Morton Shapiro, on why the university stands out from their competitors. While emphasizing the school’s motivated approach to maximizing attention toward undergraduate students, Shapiro professed that the school’s “focus on undergrads without losing the identity as a great research institute” is a quality that sets Northwestern apart. This ideal, which is a crucial part of Northwestern’s identity, makes it all the more captivating. In the majority of colleges I have researched during my prodigious quest for the perfect university, I found that their “commitment to every student” was…

    • 286 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1968 a philosopher named H.J. McCloskey wrote an article titled “On Being an Atheist,” which attacked the main arguments held by theists. The main arguments that he refers to as “proofs” are the cosmological argument, the teleological argument, and the ontological argument. McCloskey’s article debunks these arguments as being false and without proof. He states that theists should dismiss the idea of God entirely. He claims in his opening statements that he will show reasons why theists should be miserable just because they are theists (1).…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Bayard de Volo’s (2016) methodological approach entails using the feminist international relations lens to several major pieces of evidence, including examining the nature of drone warfare, and a transcription between a drone crew on the 2010 US attack in central Afghanistan that killed 23 civilians. Using gender and the feminist international relations lens to understand the implications of war and gender relations, her analysis focuses on the shift of meanings about masculinity, militarization, and war at the state and individual level of…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Andrew Rotter Gender

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Andrew Rotter claims that the history of the United States’ foreign relations is not widely thought to warrant a gendered perspective. However, as a number of historians are discovering, gender is fundamental to U.S. foreign policy, and is present in the full discourse of international relations, where masculinity symbolises dominance, power and capability, and femininity symbolises passivity, domesticity and naiveté. Such matters are strategized and filtered through gendered lenses, with the Masculine taking the role of protector of the Feminine, or those who need protecting. This essay will analyse the importance of gender when it comes to U.S. foreign policy, using Andrew Rotter’s case study of U.S.-India relations during the Cold War,…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the text, it alleged that there was a slave named Dred Scott, who was apparently born in Southhampton County, Va around 1790. Scott was a slave, and the property of the Peter Blow family. Furthermore, the text suggest that Dred Scott was passed around to several different slave owners, one of which lived in territories that prohibited slave ownership. For example, the text points out that Scott Dred was sold to John Emerson who worked throughout Illinois, and the Wisconsin territories, under which the Northwest Ordinances prohibited slavery.…

    • 410 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the distributed self would suggest that how people experience the world and make sense of it is primarily a result of socio-cultural processes, which varies over time and space. Constructionists conceptualize depression as an identity continually renegotiated via linguistic exchange and social performance. They would argue that the biological attitude excludes the social and linguistic dimensions of experience from consideration; social constructionist perspective is essential to understand how subjectivity and meaning are constructed in language and social interaction. For example I will briefly discuss the argument of gender differences in depression and how social constructionists consider that through looking at the ‘material discursive’ practices it is the pressures of society, which causes depression. They argue that a certain pressure is thrust upon women to be doing activities that fits the ideology of being a ‘good woman’ this can exhaust the woman’s body therefore causing depression.…

    • 418 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a consequence, when the gun control activists only look at a specific part of the amendment they can easily interpret it so that it supports their cause. David Clark is such an activist, and he believes that because the 2nd amendment says “well regulated militia,” then the amendment only protects the states rights in forming government ran militias, not individual rights in owning firearms (Young 70). As a result of his interpretation of the amendment, Clark is able to say that the Constitution reinforces his call for gun control. So to people who aren’t as educated in this specific topic, Clark’s view is taken as truth since he says the Constitution backs him up. Sadly a lot of people don’t do their own research and take other’s views…

    • 132 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In times of war life changes, and for women it was a battle for change of their rights. In both passages, “Breaking Tradition” by Kathleen Ernst, and “A Family Affair” by Gina DeAngelis and Lisa Ballinger, the topic of change was mentioned but only one passage truly depicted this change. In “Breaking Tradition” the author strays away from the topic on more than one occasion making it very unappealing and ineffective. But in “A Family Affair”, the author used how the time of war encouraged this change and described the changes these women received and were supported for. “Breaking Tradition” by Kathleen Ernst was supposed to be about change for women during the Civil War.…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    How is the Constitution written to guarantee that the government will be, and forever remain, limited in power? The Constitution was written upon the six principles to ensure our government would forever be with limited power to protect the United States of America. A limited government is a political system that legalized force is restricted to enumerated powers. The idea of a limited government is related to political thinkers, who used a unique way of showing emphasis to prevent government from having all power. Some wanted to connect divine law and natural law; others wanted a social compact to establish the government, to protect property and natural rights.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Federalism Although the meaning of federalism has fundamentally changed over time, Anti-federalists of the time have generally been contented on the issue of the Constitution as a direct result of the Bill of Rights. Throughout the major change from the states’ rights approach to federalism to the approach of competitive federalism, that still serves us well to this day. New brands of federalism have emerged, directly influenced by major social or economic events throughout the history of federalism, and while “the US Constitution specifies exclusive and concurrent powers for the national and state governments. Other powers are implied and determined by day-to-day politics” (Paletz, Owen and Cook 91).…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Carol Cohn’s writing “War, Wimps and Women” discusses the impact of gender discourse on warfare through analyzing personal experience, observing defense intellectuals and analyzing an experience of a male physicist. Cohn’s main goal is “to understand something about how defense intellectuals think, and why they think that way”(Cohn, 228), and how gender discourse impacts their thoughts and decisions. Gender discourse has a large impact in how the defense intellectuals think, and therefore gender discourse has a large impact on the decisions and outcomes of war. Gender discourse is words, the way language is used and most importantly a system of meanings and ways of thinking (228). Cohn starts out her writing by discussing what gender discourse is, why she decided to analyze it and the way in which she is analyzing it.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Though history tends to paint a “single story” of war with women waiting at home and men fighting for their cause, it is…

    • 1922 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays