Driverless Conundrum

These vehicle can have serious impacts on our lives since it is new to our world. It has to take a while to get the vehicle administered to our society, to get everything to work according to the pedestrians and to our laws. These cars must know how to transition from having their own kind to automobile and other means of transportation such as bikes, scooter, skateboards etc. This invention has put Google into a conundrum and that is humans. Humans are the biggest problem because they “don’t behave by the book”. Do you think its a bad thing “we don’t behave by the book”? This topic is controversial because many of us since we were small have bended a law or have broke a law. How many of you have not jaywalked? I have therefore I disagree, if someone wants to create a product that will benefit our lives in one tiny way, why not create it …show more content…
According to “Google’s Driverless cars run into problem: Cars with drivers” article, Google cars have been “ in 16 crashes, mostly fender bender, and in every case, the company claims it was the human fault”. With this much accidents in 2009 the manufacturers should think about a better way to solve the fledgling conundrum. However according to John Lee, a Professor of industrial and system engineering and expert in driver safety and automation of University of Wisconsin, claims that humans have eyes to detect treat and the ability to make agreement about which is the right way. “Where are the eyes in an autonomous vehicle?” what can driverless cars do if there is a situation that involves maneuvering on a highway? Cars don’t have the senses to detect danger from its surrounding although it may have the capabilities of similarities softwares. Since driverless cars are new to the human society it may take a long time to get the vehicle accustomed/suited for our world rather than having all