Having read both the PRO and CON article for driverless cars, the PRO article gave weaker evidence. The PRO article was based off of what they thought people would do they did not have hard cold evidence unlike the CON article. This article would use phrases like most likely which is not a solid argument. An example of this is under Suburban Life is Preferred the sentence " Most likely they will also alter where and how people live.'' In this article the author should include a servery showing how many people who live in the suburban area would switch to a driverless car. Other details that would help strength their argument is if they were to add details on how the car works and how the safety of the cars
