Drinking Age Debate Essay

2148 Words 9 Pages
Laws are carried out for the sole purpose of improving everyday society. Taking this into account, every law that is reformed, is taken into much consideration and is believed to be what is best for the public. Throughout the past couple of years, several debates regarding the minimum drinking age have amounted, thus meaning that this issue is one that cannot be forgotten, instead it should be dealt with immediately. Some might believe that the minimum drinking age should be lowered from 21 to 18 years of age. What those few people are not considering is the fact that decades ago, when the drinking age was lowered …show more content…
For example, much research was completed and it has been proven that after MLDA 21 was enforced, the percentage of car accidents involving 18-20 year olds has declined by 13%. Although this might not seem like a very high percentage, in terms of the human population, that new law has saved the lives of 27,052 Americans over the past 33 years ("Drinking Age ProCon.org"). It’s truly saddening thinking about all of the lives that would have been lost if those states had decided to leave the minimum drinking age at 18, however, fortunately, several U.S states followed others in their successful attempt of raising it to 21. Those thousands of saved lives could have been the lost lives of family and friends, however, the U.S was smart and raised the legal drinking age for the goodness of all americans. According to the National Highway Transportation Safety Administration, approximately 500 lives are saved each year due to the higher minimum drinking age ("Should the U.S. Lower Its Drinking Age?"). It wouldn’t make much sense to lower the legal drinking age once again, knowing the fact that several positives have amounted since the legal age was increased. Less injuries and deaths means that Americans are healthier and are at …show more content…
It is highly likely that younger underage drinkers would have an easier way to get ahold of alcohol if MLDA 18 was passed. This is because of the, “...trickle down’ effect ("Drinking Age ProCon.org"). Numerous people of the legal drinking age buy their younger peers alcohol. Several studies state that the most common source of alcohol for 18-20 year olds is their 21-24 year old peers. By knowing this, it is accurate to say that lowering the minimum drinking age to 18 would cause for even younger peers to take part in underage drinking ("Drinking Age ProCon.org"). That would cause a dramatic increase of underaged drinking among the 15-19 year old age group. While many might just think of the increase of alcohol inside of college dorms, there would also be an increase of alcohol within communities as a whole. The higher the accessibility of alcohol, the harder it is to undermine underaged binge drinking. Furthermore, greater alcohol attainability raises the rate of abuse and addiction. When alcohol is around, it is more likely for someone to be peer pressured into drinking even if they have not yet reached the MLDA ("State of New Jersey"). 72 percent of adults agree on the fact that lowering the drinking age to 18 would only cause harm to younger teens because they would be at a constant easy access of alcohol (US News). Accessibility of alcohol is a

Related Documents