Dred Scott Case Analysis

Improved Essays
The Dread Scott Vs. Sanford which was a revolutionary and historic case that helped draw attention to the issue of slavery and was decided on Mar 5, 1857.During the time of the case, if you were black you were viewed as an inferior and had no strong rights or future in America. The case of Dred Scott not only challenged the views of other about blacks but added to turmoil and inefficiency of government control of its citizens. The case challenged the structure of our government system and also signified the importance of our 14th Amendment which was not in place at the time.
A case that exploited the significance and problems associated with slavery were that of Dred Scott vs. Sanford . In the case of Dred Scott he was an African American
…show more content…
One example is that the views of the figure Taney. When he died was viewed as villain in the north but as a supporter in the south and is only recognized as the person who denied a slave his freedom. In addition, he declared that Scott had never been free and continued to be a black slave .This ultimately led to the declaration that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional and made the Federal Government had no right to prohibit slavery in the new territories. When the case was finally decided the American public reacted strongly to the Dred Scott case. Several groups arose following the case. One Antislavery group feared that slavery would spread unchecked which caused chaos .Also a Republican party was founded 1854 to prohibit the spread of slavery. There political compain led to the division of the democratic party. This led to a huge stepping stone which led to the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States and South Carolina's secession from the Union. The Dred Scott case not only influenced political party’s actions but the election of the president. The country as a whole country pushed the closer and closer to a civil war following these events. And the abolition of slavery was on the

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    One of the most controversial cases in American History was the case of Dred Scott versus Sanford. Dred Scott was a slave who lived with his owner, Doctor John Emerson in the free state of Illinois. Dred Scott and his wife, Harriet, both had lived in a free state for a decade, and they decided to file for emancipation. Commonly, slaves would sue for their freedom if they had live in free territory for a long period of time. Their cases were not at first acknowledged because of the outbreak of cholera and backed up court schedules but eventually their case was heard, and the Scotts won favor.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, the Dred Scott decision empowered proslavery Southerners. The 1854 Dred Scott v. Standford case was brought all the way to Supreme Court and was regarding a slave who lived in an area illegal to slavery because of the Missouri Compromise and was suing Standford for freedom (Brands 2015, 323). This case caused controversy; Firstly, because slaves could not be citizens at the time therefore they should not be allowed to sue a citizen.…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Dred Scott Decision In 1846, after about 46 years of being a slave, I awoke feeling confident and brave. Today I would do something I been thinking about doing this forever. Today I went to the Missouri State Court and I asked the court to be free,claiming that I have lived in a free state and territory. But, the court claimed I was still a slave.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    March 6, 1875 a court verdict that will preside in infamy, the verdict of the Dred Scott versus John Sandford Supreme Court case. Dred Scott, a once enslaved African-American man who then moved with his wife to Illinois, a free state or one in which slavery is illegal. By virtue of not being allowed to purchase land undeterred by the fact that under state legislation he was a free man, Dred Scott attempted to sue in a federal court. The chief justice in this case was Chief Justice Roger B Taney, a Federalist white man. He was also born and raised in a slaveholding household, obviously one that was against the freedom of negroes in America.…

    • 1855 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Dred Scott Court Cases

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Taney ruled that slave was not a citizen of the American so they had no right to bring their any disputes to the federal courts. Furthermore, the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional because slave was personal property so Scott had never been free. The court also made a decision that the slavery could not be banned or deprived in the United State. All the decision to the Dred Scott case created a strong react for the American Public and antislavery groups because they feared that slavery would increase uncontrolled. These decision also damaged to the national unity especially the Northern and Southern.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Case Essay

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This looked to be just a simple case in which Scott should've been ruled a free man. However, it turned into one of the most controversial court cases ever. The motives for this ruling seemed to be that the courts wanted to defer the decision of slavery unto the states. It was a crucial case which in the southerner’s eyes decided the national…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks, slaves as well as free, were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories (McPherson). The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free states of Illinois and Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, appealed to the Supreme Court in hopes of winning his freedom. Scott traveled with his master, John Emerson, an army surgeon who was often transferred.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court said that Dred Scott could not sue for his freedom because he was a slave under Missouri law and slaves are considered property, thus not being able to sue. The decision was that there was nothing in their power that they could do to make people slaves or free. This angered many Northerners where they believed that slavery should be illegal compared to the Southerners, who were pleased because they believed that slavery should be legal. Tensions got worse until the South could not handle it in the most important election in American history.…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott unsuccessfully sued Missouri for his freedom. The final judgment was that Dred Scott was still considered a slave. This helped the government and the president under stand that blacks were treated so unfair. Blacks were vary ignorant at this time because they could not go to school and because of that they had no knowledge. So they helped very little to get to the civil rights movement.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Urofsky mentions how many of the cases similar to Scott’s relied on not only American precedent, but precedent from the Somerset case, where Lord Mansfield declared Somerset free since there existed no positive law in England that upheld the status of a slave in England’s jurisdiction, given its orthogonal relationship to both common and natural law. Urofsky writes, “In 1824, in Winny v. Whitesides, the Missouri Supreme Court had declared that an enslaved person who had been taken to the free territory of Illinois had become a free person” (Urofsky 77). And roughly 12 years later, “in Rachel v. Walker, the court held that a slave…became free when her owner took her to military bases…where slavery was prohibited” (Urofsky 78). The Dred Scott…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The decision had eventually turned against the anti-slavery Northerners. Many people had said that this was one of courts’ worst decisions. This leads to sectionalism between the North and the South because the decision had supported the idea of slavery meaning that it had gone against the Northerners who were…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays