Dred Scott: A Life Of A Slave

Improved Essays
Imagine that day, all eyes on you in the courtroom. You have been through so much and you finally think you are going to be freed. Then you are told that you don’t even have a right to a trial because you aren’t a citizen. The anger you must feel to do so much and just be shut down like it was nothing. This is how Dred Scott must have felt when the Supreme Court ruled against him. Even though slavery was seen as an evil, The Dred Scott decision stated that no slave can be a citizen, they cannot have their own freedoms and must be seen as just a slave in the country no matter what state their master takes them to, free or slaves.
Dred Scott was born into slavery on 1799, to the Peter Blow family in Virginia (“The Life of Dred
…show more content…
Harriet and Dred later had two children who were named Eliza and Lizzie (“Dred Scott Timeline”). In 1842 The Scott family then moved back to St. Louis with Dr. Emerson and his new wife (“Early Life”). When John Emerson died in 1843, Dred and Harriet, along with their children were hired by Mrs. Emerson to work for different families in St. Louis (“Early Life”). Then three years after Dr. Emerson died, Dred Scott tried to make a deal with Eliza Emerson who was the wife of Dr. Emerson and the deal was that if he paid her $300, she would then set them free (“Dred Scott's Fight for …show more content…
Also that they cannot have their own freedoms and must be seen as just a slave in the country no matter what state their master takes them to, free or slaves. It was something that no one truly thought it would have defied. That is also why he was so much more angered by the conclusion of this case. To know that no matter what he will always be considered a slave and nothing greater in this country. It was this Supreme Court Decision which pushed the abolitionist in the North to push even more for the end of slavery. This led to the Civil

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    history. The Dred Scott v. Sandford was probably the worst court decision ever decided by supreme court justices, as Dred Scott a former slave was taken to go live in Illinois (a free-state) for a year. Dred Scott along with his wife Harriet sued their owners for having slaves in a free-state and should be granted their freedom. This 11-year long struggle would soon surface into the Supreme Court, where by a majority margin, 7-2, Scott was sadly still a slave. In an attempt to end and solve the slavery problem once and for all, Supreme Court Justice Roger B. Taney quote "[Black people] Had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order, and altogether unfit to associate with the white race, either in social or political relations; and so far inferior that they had no rights which…

    • 1601 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery and Westward Expansion had a very volatile relationship in the Antebellum era America and would contribute to the American Civil War. Westward expansion and the Missouri Compromise of 1820 would be a way to preserve unity within the Union, but over the next 30 years, ties between the Northern and Southern states would be strained as more territory is gained and the question regarding slavery’s place within these new lands. Through an analysis of book and article sources, one gains the idea that Westward expansion, slavery, and the place of Africans and their rights would continue to tear away at the union until it was ripped apart when South Carolina secedes from the Union and is followed by six more states after the election of President…

    • 1096 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was a important person in America and in the Supreme Court's history. He helped push America towards what's right and the Civil War. Dred Scott was born sometime in 1795 and was born into slavery. He had a brother and a father and mother. His family and him were owned by Peter Blow.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri that had travelled with his master to the free state of Illinois. After his master died he believed that he was free because he was now in a free state and petitioned for his freedom. Once this case made its way up to the Supreme Court the ruling was in favor of the South, wherever slave owners move they maintain the rights to their slaves, even if they move to a free state. Again, the North was not happy. This ruling meant that slavery could potentially exist in the North as well; once again slavery was somehow creeping into the North.…

    • 1680 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scott escaped slavery from the South just to face even bigger problems. He had the chance to argue his case in court, and was sent back to slavery because he was considered as “property.” This case also showed that the Union somewhat supported slavery at the time, not allowing Scott to go free. “Fourscore and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” - Abraham Lincoln. According to the constitution, all men are created equal, and this case completely opposed…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott Vs Sanford Case

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The ruling of the case said that no African-American had rights and that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. Many of the northern states denounced the law which led to the formation of the Republican party. Historians believe that the ruling of this case was the biggest mistake that the Supreme Court ever made. If it was not for Dred Scott’s perseverance and motivation for the issue of freedom and citizenship for African - Americans the issue may have never come up. Even though Dred Scott and his family did not receive their freedom from this case, they did keep their family together through the case, which was unheard of during this time.…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Dbq

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This amendment, however, addressed the original ideals that were formed in the Declaration of Independence; for example, the declaration states, “All men are created equal,” and after the Civil War, the epiphany came to light that African-Americans were also men, and they, also, should be treated equally not only as citizens, but as humans. Most citizens of color and different ethnicity were not given fair treatment in the judicial system prior to the 14th. For example, the case of Dred Scott v Sandford, was an unfair trial due to racism. Dred Scott was a slave owned by John Emerson, after he had passed his wife Eliza Irene Sanford took his estate. While under Sanford control, Dred Scott tried to buy his freedom for his family but Sanford refused.…

    • 868 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2) As a slave and a black, he was not a citizen because at the time the constitution was written, blacks “had for more than a century before been regarded as beings of an inferior order… so far inferior, that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” As such, Scott had no right to sue in Federal Court. 3) The provisions of the Act of 1820, known as the Missouri Compromise, were voided as a legislative act because the act exceeded the powers of Congress, insofar as it attempted to exclude slavery and impart freedom and citizenship to Black people in the northern part of the Louisiana cession. Scott’s stay in free territory did not make him free…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Dred Scott was a former slave whose slave’s owner moved to a free state where slavery is prohibited. When they returned to Missouri Scott sued for his freedom that he had by living in a free territory. The discussion take place during the trial was basically that a Negro slave descendants free or not were not apart of the people. Africans were inferior and had no right of a white man. They also challenged the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution by stating that the situation is not warranted by the constitution.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What do I want most in life? You can’t want something and not work for it. There are sacrifices and long journeys you need to make so you can be close to where you want to be. The books we reviewed are Anthem by Ayn Rand, ‘Emancipation Proclamation’, ‘Prometheus’. We also listened to an audio that went into a deeper meaning of what critical thinking is and had a Socratic Seminar.…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Roger B. Taney, was a previous slave proprietor from Maryland. The United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks - slaves as well as free - were not and could never become citizens of the United States. Court’s majority decided that because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. The framers of the Constitution, believed that blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect; and that the negro might justly and lawfully be reduced to slavery for his benefit. He was bought and sold and treated as an ordinary article of merchandise and traffic,…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard about the slave sued his owner’s widow for his freedom? Well, the decision in Dred Scott v. Sanford is considered to be one of the most influential in legal history because the Supreme Court decided that the slaves are not defined as citizens of the United States, thus influencing their ability to sue in federal courts and this case eventually raised questions about slavery which led to the civil war. Dred Scott was a man who was once an African-American slave. He was sold in Missouri as a slave to an army surgeon, Dr. John Emerson, they later moved and lived in free states; Illinois and Wisconsin. Then, they moved back to Missouri, which is a slave state, but John Emerson passed away in 1846, so it is time he should become free.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was slave who sued for his liberty in the Missouri courts, arguing that four years on free soil had made him free. He was once owned by army surgeon John Emerson. Dred Scott’s attorney argued that between 1831 and 1833, John Emerson had taken Scott with him during various military postings to areas where the Missouri Compromise banned slavery, making Dred Scott a free man. When nearly after six years in the Missouri courts, the state Supreme Court rejected this argument in 1852, Dred Scott, with the help of abolitionist lawyers, appealed to the United States Supreme Court. In a 7 to 2 decision, the Court ruled against Dred Scott.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dred Scott was an African American man in the United States that sued for the freedom of himself, the freedom of his wife, and the freedom of his kids in the Dred Scott vs. Stanford case. Dred Scott believed that he and his wife should have been granted the privilege of becoming United States of America citizens because he and his wife had lived in Illinois and the Wisconsin Territory for four years. The U.S. Supreme Court voted against Dred Scott 7-2. With the disagreement of the Supreme Court, the Dred Scott Decision was brought up. The Dred Scott Decision was a decision in which free or slaved African-Americans were not allowed to be American citizens and the federal government had power to regulate slavery.…

    • 1041 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frederick Douglass was one of the most influential abolitionists of 19th century America. His main purpose in writing his narrative was to rebuke the romantic image of slavery in the antebellum south. For decades, southerners and northerners would create reasons for rationalizing the institution of slavery. Through his narrative, Douglass convinces Americans of the true conditions of slavery by including characters that contradict the romantic image of slavery, proving that slaves are intellectually capable, and explaining why slaves are disloyal. Douglass includes many figures from his early life in his narrative that portray an accurate depiction of the horrific life of a slave.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays