Jocasta believes this a trivial fact, a mere coincidence irrelevant to the prophecy. The irony is that it is in fact the opposite; it is in fact the root of the characters’ plight. From the audience’s perspective it makes sense that Lauis looked like Oedipus because, as the audience knows, Lauis is Oedipus’s father. As the play continues the characters are still unable to see the blatant connection between Oedipus revealing he was, “doomed to be murderer of the father that begot me (him),” (45) and their current situation. In the characters’ minds they have averted this fate; Lauis and Jocasta’s son is dead and murderers killed Lauis. This false truth interferes with the characters abilities’ to correctly interpret this information. Ultimately, it is these instances, where the truth is known and the characters still fail to connect them, that enhance the dramatic irony of the
Jocasta believes this a trivial fact, a mere coincidence irrelevant to the prophecy. The irony is that it is in fact the opposite; it is in fact the root of the characters’ plight. From the audience’s perspective it makes sense that Lauis looked like Oedipus because, as the audience knows, Lauis is Oedipus’s father. As the play continues the characters are still unable to see the blatant connection between Oedipus revealing he was, “doomed to be murderer of the father that begot me (him),” (45) and their current situation. In the characters’ minds they have averted this fate; Lauis and Jocasta’s son is dead and murderers killed Lauis. This false truth interferes with the characters abilities’ to correctly interpret this information. Ultimately, it is these instances, where the truth is known and the characters still fail to connect them, that enhance the dramatic irony of the