In the book, during the same scene where the brides attempt to feed on Jonathan, the Count gives them a baby to feed on instead (Stoker 65). Later in the book, the reader finds out that the turned Lucy is kidnapping and feeding on children (Stoker 211). However, in the film, the audience sees none of this behavior. Lucy’s preying on children is brought up very briefly, but the topic is quickly changed and never spoken about again. The act of feeding on small children is considered abhorrent even today, nevertheless, people are more open to being horrified by typically unthinkable acts such as eating a child. While we as humans still find it repulsive, today it is accepted as a method of horror. In 1931, people would have been so disgusted with the scene, that few would have been willing to go see it. Browning realized this, and planned accordingly, taking out the two scenes involving the feeding of
In the book, during the same scene where the brides attempt to feed on Jonathan, the Count gives them a baby to feed on instead (Stoker 65). Later in the book, the reader finds out that the turned Lucy is kidnapping and feeding on children (Stoker 211). However, in the film, the audience sees none of this behavior. Lucy’s preying on children is brought up very briefly, but the topic is quickly changed and never spoken about again. The act of feeding on small children is considered abhorrent even today, nevertheless, people are more open to being horrified by typically unthinkable acts such as eating a child. While we as humans still find it repulsive, today it is accepted as a method of horror. In 1931, people would have been so disgusted with the scene, that few would have been willing to go see it. Browning realized this, and planned accordingly, taking out the two scenes involving the feeding of