Andrew Rider of Michigan Insurance Company referred this file for medical case management. Instructions were given to meet with Chris Simonson and assist with coordination of appropriate and related medical care, and identify needs to facilitate recovery. INTERVIEW SETTING On 8/25/16 I met Mr. Simonson at the office of Mid Michigan Orthopedics. Mr. Simonson drove independently to the appointment.…
In Valley Medical Specialists v. Faber, 194 Ariz. 363, 982 P.2d 1277 (1999), the court held that the covenant between Plaintiff Valley Medical Specialists and Defendant Faber would not be enforceable. Valley Medical Specialists employed Dr. Faber as an internist and pulmonologist in 1985 to treated HIV-positive patients. This therapy known as Brachytherapy could only be treated at certain facilities as not all facilities obtained the necessary equipment to do so. When Dr. Faber ended his employment with Valley Medical Specialists, he signed a covenant. The covenant prevented Dr. Faber from accepting employment in a competing facility in a five-mile radius.…
On 9/26/14 the Board received a complaint from attorney David Streett on behalf of his client Malik Karim against Dr. Stanley Librach of St. Louis. Karim’s complaint alleged that Dr. Librach had confronted him in his office in a threatening manner. Karim’s complaint stated that the Doctor’s actions gave him concern for his safety as well as the well-being of a business associate that was with him in his office at the time. Malik Karim notified St. Peters Police Department by calling 911 while the incident was in progress. Dr. Librach left the complainant’s office and property of 2730 South St. Peters Parkway in St. Peters while the complainant was on the phone with 911. Patrolman Daniel Olshwanger generated an incident report for peace disturbance which was forwarded to the St. Peters Municipal Prosecutor’s office.…
Levine v. Mcgrath 1. Against For She could stay with her sister It is what Sarah wanted She could see her school friends and grow up in the same neighbourhood she had before 2. Separating the sisters was not the main concern in this case as Sarah wanted to move herself, and they would still be able to see each other on alternating weekends if they wished to.…
COMES NOW the Defendant, Richard John Ohlhaver, by and through counsel, Vernida R. Chaney, and moves this Honorable Court for entry of an order authorizing a competency evaluation pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4241. In support of this motion, the following is submitted: 1. Mr. Ohlhaver is charged with Conspiracy to Commit Theft, 18 U.S.C.§ 371; Theft of Government Property, 18 U.S.C. § 641; Concealment of Event Affecting Right to a Title II Benefit, 42 U.S.C. § 408; Access Device Fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2); and False Statement for use in Determining Right to Title II Benefit Payment, 18 U.S.C. § 408(a)(3). 2.…
The jury heard about Mr. Vaugeois’ first incident on September 15th, 2015 from a CHEAM Village Employee. She testified that though he was a calm and respectful person, he started to develop an unusual behavior that day. On September 15th, 2015, he had both emotionally and physically traumatized staff and other residents by using strong words and physical violence. She attempted to calm him down by providing distance and space. Later he struck a senior resident as they were getting snacks.…
Good afternoon Vivian: The Third Amended Complaint no longer contains any state law claims. Plaintiff’s counsel advised that she removed all of the state tort claims from the Complaint in order to allow the Court and parties to focus on the federal claims. With respect to the settlement conference, clients generally do not attend the conference.…
The Case of Dr. Samuel A. Mudd Dr.Samuel A. Mudd was charged with Treason and Conspiracy. He was accused in the case of John Wilkes Booth, and the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. The sentence from the military commision to Dr. Mudd was life in prison. Some believed that he deserved and some thought that he did not deserve it. To begin Dr. Mudd said that he knew John Wilkes Booth .…
As for the opposing side, the author lays out the perspectives of a local attorney, Michael D. Barnes. Barnes credits himself as a working prosecuting attorney for over 20 years in disagreeing with the abolishment of peremptory challenges. According to the favoring side concerning the process of peremptory challenges: “just seat 12 randomly selected, qualified candidates whose minds are open to a serious evaluation of the facts”. In that aspect, Barnes questions the validity of who and how these potential jurors’ “qualifications” and “openness” are to be determined and to what extent. Subsequently, he asserts that his credentials allow him to obtain no difficulty in implementing impartial judgements accordingly.…
On March 21 and 22, 2016, the depositions of Plaintiff’s job superintendent, Tim Barton, and DSA’s representative and former president, Joe Wayne George, were taken. On April 15, 2016, Plaintiff’s expert cost estimator, Kenny O’Bannon, was deposed. This Memo will summarize the witnesses’ testimony, credibility, and demeanor. 1. Plaintiff’s job superintendent, Timothy “Tim” Barton…
Plaintiff is a “well known” anti-smoking advocate; at the invitation of a radio talk host, he made radio appearance. Plaintiff claims that a co-host lit a cigar and repeatedly blew smoke in his face. Plaintiff sued the radio host, co-host, and the radio station for battery, invasion of privacy, and for violation of a health regulation. Trial court dismissed the complaint and plaintiff appealed. ISSUES: Is blowing smoke in someone’s face battery?…
A Civil Action: response “The truth? I thought we were talking about a court of law. C’mon you’ve been around long enough to know the court isn't the place to look for the truth. You're lucky to find anything here that in any way resembles the truth.”…
Writing Assignment 3 2.1 Standing to Sue Facts: An Idaho couple, Jack and Maggie Turton, purchased a house in Jefferson County directly across from a gravel pit. Years later the county converted the pit into a landfill that collected environmentally harmful trash including: major appliances, animal carcasses, containers with hazardous content, leaking car batteries, and waste oil. The couple complained to the county but the county refused to act.…
Medical Malpractice Why it went to court. Mary Carnahan HA 210 Medical Law and Ethics October 31, 2014 Introduction We are going to take a medical malpractice case that went to court. Research the case to see why it went to court. I chose a medical malpractice case from Phoenixville, PA.…
A tort is a civil wrong that are done by one party against another or causes someone else to suffer loss or harm resulting for the person who commits the act. Tort law decides whether a person should be held legally responsible for injury against another, and what type of compensation the injured party is entitled to. There are 4 elements to tort law which are duty, breach of duty, causation and injury.…