How To Evaluate The Milgram Experiment

Superior Essays
In 1962, Dr. Stanley Milgram conducted an experiment to test the authority of the average American citizen. Milgram gathered a group of forty men to test their obedience to an authoritative figure. Each subject was brought into the experiment under the impression that they were going to be evaluated on how well they were able to learn a series of word combinations. The way they were encouraged to remember these combinations was by using a form of negative extrinsic motivation. Each time a wrong answer was given, the learner would administer a shock of increasing value to the learner. The shocks started at a voltage of fifteen volts and increased by fifteen volts until they were administering a shock measuring 450 volts. What the test subjects …show more content…
The experiment conductor urged the “teacher” to continue after every hesitation and the resistance to the action was measured. The experiment was done four separate times. Each time the experiment was reperformed, the distance between the teacher and learner was changed. The findings were that people do what they are told to do if an authority figure has given them a command. However, the results started to trend down as the teacher and learner got closer to one another. The poorest results occurred when the teacher had to physically touch the learner in order to punish him. The most cooperative test subjects were the subjects who could not see or hear the learning person. The Milgram experiment pushed the ethical limits to the brink in 1962. Ethical evaluations between authority figures and subjects began in the Greek era. Milgram covered himself by informing the test subject that would receive the shock what would happen. Yet, the information he provided was inaccurate and therefore not legally acceptable any longer. Milgram began the experiment by completely misinforming his subjects of what the true intention of the experiment was. This begins to breach the moral

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many agree that the Milgram experiment could not be reproduced today due to its circumstances. According to Chapter 1 in the book, concealing the true intent of an experiment is entirely ethical in psychological research for the sake of experimental validity. The experimenter’s lie that the experiment was about the effects of punishment on learning rather than compliance to obedience is perfectly fine, since the results might not have been as accurate otherwise. The real issue comes with the emotional trauma that the experiment could cause to its participants. The mental damage that comes from knowing that you are capable of such horrible things just because someone told you to do them is quite a glaring issue in the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The psychological testing that took place in the Milgram experiment was interesting to me. Even though I had learned about the experiment in previous courses, I had never seen actual footage from the testing. The most disturbing moment of the video was when one “teacher” was obviously in disagreement about administering the shocks, but continued…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, began an experiment in July 1961 that would drastically alter society’s perception of obedience. Milgram formulated a test to comprehend how far people would perform when coerced into obeying an authoritative figure. The experiment involved subjects being tricked into believing they were electrically shocking another individual; physical and emotional harm to the subjects was followed, resulting from the extreme tension they encountered. Ultimately, Milgram thought he found an underlying connection between his experiment and the Holocaust. The study manufactured mixed reactions from society.…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First when milgram set up this experiment he was properly educated in the neccassary field, which is in compliance with first rule of the ASA code of ethics. Next, in accordince with part B of the ASA code of ethics Milgram was respectful, fair, and did not conduct himself in a way that would have put himself, or other professionals well being at risk. But I do have some resorvations about the part of B that states “they do not knowingly make statements that are false, misleading, or deceptive”in reference to socialogist. Here I bekieve there might be some conflict because the socioligist's knownling set up the experiment to be rigged.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram and Stanford Experiment During the Milgram and Stanford experiment, each person had a special role. When given a role, people try their best to fulfill their duties no matter what is required of them. These experiments aim to understand how far someone will go to obey their superiors and follow instructions. You were either a prisoner, guard, teacher, or a learner. Each and every one of these participants were influenced into having demand characteristics.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The learner was ordered to scream evidently loud so the teacher will have a feeling of uneasiness. Surprisingly, Stanley Milgrams prediction of how all his volunteers would disobey the experiment was unbiased and proven…

    • 1327 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Milgram’s essay “The Perils of Obedience,” he states “the real focus of the experiment is the teacher” (692). During the process there was a teacher, student, and experimenter, the students were hired actors. The experiment consisted of the teacher giving the student words in which the learner had to repeat them back, and if they got them wrong they would be shocked and the voltage would elevate with each wrong answer. Throughout the process and various teachers, Milgram saw different reactions, only one stood up for the learner refusing to proceed based on the learner’s reactions, another laughed uncontrollably, and the rest followed orders with no remorse regardless of how the student reacted (Milgram 695). Milgram’s point was “to extricate himself from this plight, the subject must make a clear break with authority” (693).…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Milgram states "As the experiment progressed there was no indication of injurious effects in the subjects; and as the subjects themselves strongly endorsed the experiment, the judgment I made was to continue the experiment(1). “ The…

    • 409 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His use of language gives a complete detail description demonstrating the procedures of each participant in the experiment of what is expected of them. Stanley Milgram portrays a research experiment by means of two individuals to test the boundaries of obedience which requires to be responsible for agony upon a person. In what way can an individual legitimize the brutality that was exposed in the research experiment merely because they were obeying commands made by authoritative figures? The experiment brings to light the lack of ownership of one 's actions an individual is willing to take when they feel they were simply following orders. Milgram makes a good point when he states that "the experimenter did not threaten the subjects with punishment – such as loss of income, community ostracism, or jail – for failure to obey" (p. 409-10).…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before Milgram conducted his research, he has asked several people for their predictions on the results. No one, including experts, expected anyone apart from extreme cases to continue administering the electric shocks up to 450V. The experts expected most of the participants to refuse to continue before 150V. Results of Milgram’s experiment support the hypothesis that the obedience to authority could induce people to contribute to the Second World War’s homicide. Results of Hofling et al. ’s study show that obedience to authority can lead to violations of procedures and, consequently, putting human health and life into risk where the special care and meticulousness is expected. Both studies lead to conclusion that obedience to authority can lead to fatal consequences and this problem might be underestimated.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this experiment they were given the same setup as in the Milgram experiment, a teacher, learner, and they also set the rooms up the same way, they also had to memorize the same exact list of words. The one major difference were the results, and they were very different. In the Milgram experiment only about fifty percent went all the way, however in the experiment the UK did, nine out of twelve people went all the way, or seventy-five percent, and that is a major difference. The percentage increased twenty-five percent in three years. This helps prove my point that people are either getting more violent, or are more likely to follow what people are telling them to do no matter what the consequences are.…

    • 1515 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Milgram recruited 40 males all between the ages of 20 and 50 years old. They were paid to be part of this test and were told that they would be part of an experiment that studies “learning”. In reality, the experiment was all about studying their behavior towards following orders. Before the start of the experiment, each of the volunteers were introduced by the “experimenter” a man named “Mr. Wallace”. The volunteers where made aware that Mr. Wallace had heart condition.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays