Double Jeopardy

Decent Essays
1. Capital – an offense that’s accountable for the death penalty

2. Infamous – famous for something bad

3. Presentment – a presentation to the court with information

4. Indictment – an accusation or charge for a serious crime

5. Grand Jury – A jury that usually has twenty-three jurors to judge the legitimacy of a accusation

6. Subject – forced to endure

7. Offence (offense) – breaking the law

8. Jeopardy – being in danger on trial for committing a crime

9. Compelled – forcing someone to do something

10. Deprived – denied the use of something

11. Compensation – awarding someone as compensation
In one or two sentences, explain the meaning of each of the following phrases:

12. Due process of law – Due process of law is a constitutional guarantee that the justice system will be fair.

13.
…show more content…
Right against self-incrimination (“taking the Fifth”) – It’s when they cannot be punished for not talking to police.

14. Double jeopardy – Double jeopardy is a defense that prevents a defendant for being tried for the same crime twice or more.

Answer the following question:

15. What are the Miranda warnings, and how do they relate to the Fifth Amendment?
The Miranda warnings are the right to silence warning, said by the police to criminal suspects. They’re related to the Fifth Amendment because they’re required to protect the suspect from

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Salinas Vs Texas Summary

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    2) A witness may not use the Fifth Amendment to avoid giving testimony he does not want to give. 3) Invoking the Fifth Amendment makes known to the Government that a witness intends on using this right. Holding – The state court, Court of Appeals, and Court of Criminal Appeals were not in error because a witness does not invoke rights by merely remaining silent and petitioner was required to declare the right in order to protect his interests. Rationale – The court deduced that invoking the Fifth Amendment requires the proper action on the part of the person choosing to use it and proper channels exist to make these indications known for those choosing to invoke such rights.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do I think the 5th Amendment protects someone’s refusal to answer police questions when he hasn’t been arrested or read his rights? In my opinion, no, the 5th Amendment does not protect you from questioning. The judges over the Salinas v. Texas court case decided that the 5th Amendment's advantage against self-incrimination doesn’t work for people who just decide to silence themselves while being questioned. You have to claim your 5th amendment right to be able to use it.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment says that no one can be accused of a crime unless a grand jury decides that there is enough evidence to charge a person for a crime in court. The defendant has a choice to testify or not to testify. If they choose to testify, the defendant loses his Fifth Amendment privilege and must answer the questions asked. However, at the trial the defendant who has been called to the witness stand by the grand jury can refuse to answer certain…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment was written for rights in criminal and civil legal issues. In the Fifth Amendment, it says that a person does not have to be a witness against himself, otherwise known as “self-incrimination” (Cornell 5). The Sixth Amendment was written for rights for criminal defendants. The Sixth Amendment states that a defendant has the right to a attorney (Cornell 6). Both of these Amendments were made unaware of to…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Miranda Vs Arizona Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The right to remain silent is located in Fifth Amendment, and the right to have a presence of attorney is located in the Sixth Amendment of the constitution. The Supreme Court ended up ruling that it was unconstitutional to undertake the interrogation without the warning of the rights secured by the Fifth Amendment. Additionally, the court stated that they must protect the individual from the desire to self-incriminate ("Miranda v."). The court created the Miranda Warning which is as follows: "You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Newton (2004) 369 F.3d 659; see Allen v. Roe (2002) 305 F.3d 1046 (where the objectively reasonable need be based on what the officer knew at the time of questioning); see also United States v. Jones (2001) 154 F.2d 617 (likewise, holding the public exception applicable where police knew the suspect had a firearm in the apartment unattended with children present). In determining the objectively reasonable need, courts consider whether the defendant might have or recently have had a weapon and that someone other than the police might gain access to that weapon and inflict harm. (United States v. Williams (2007) 483 F.3d 425.) Accordingly, Miranda warnings are not required where there’s an objectively reasonable need in protecting the police or public from immediate danger and statements stemming from custodial interrogation must not be…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition, the Miranda rights are provided under the 5th amendment, which further ensure proper due process and protects a person’s right to liberty. Due process in the 5th amendment happens through court proceedings and protects someone suspected of a crime. With the 14th amendment, due process is a given right to limit the governments interference with, and control over, personal affairs of the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Miranda Rights help protect citizens fifth and sixth amendments. The fifth amendment protects citizens from being forced to be witness against himself, while the sixth amendment assures that those arrested have a right to a public and speedy trial (Doc E). Together, the fifth amendment protects against self-incrimination and the sixth amendment assures that those arrested can not be held in jail indefinitely. The Miranda Warning read by officers specifically states that after one is made aware of their Miranda Rights, any confession or statements can be used against oneself lawfully (Doc J). Consequently, the Miranda ruling assures that one is fully aware of their rights and are also aware of the consequences if they choose to self-incriminate after being read their…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In criminal cases , the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury, forbids double jeopardy,and protects against self incrimination . It also requires that “due process of law” be part of any proceeding that denies a citizen “life, liberty or property” and requires the government to compensate citizens when it takes private property for public use. All of your miranda rights are you have the right to remain…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The clause extends to local and state jurisdictions as well as the Supreme Court, and when exercising this right it is often referred to as “pleading the fifth.” One of the biggest changes is that the Supreme Court ruled that the clause applies not only on trial but during police interrogations as well. Now, exercising the right can be during legal proceedings or while in police custody. This way a person in police custody may refuse to answer questions about the crime they are allegedly convicted of, so in custodial interrogation. Then this person can have a backup if the police want to question them, because they are guaranteed that someone informs them of their Miranda warnings.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    (Neubauer & Fradella, 2015) The four amendments of the Bill of Right that deal with criminal procedure protect citizens. The Fourth Amendment states that the law enforcement cannot arrest a citizen or search his or her property unless there is probable cause. The Fifth Amendment…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Five Amendments

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Whereas the Fourth Amendment uses probable cause to set up if a crime is, has, or is about to occur and an arrest can be made. Then the Fifth Amendment comes into play, with the questioning of a person who has been arrested and the rights to the arrested person, specifically the reading of Miranda Rights. In 1966, Ernesto Miranda’s civil rights from the Fifth and Sixth were found to have been violated during the investigation and following interrogation. The Supreme Court determined that anyone who is in custody and being questioned needs to be read his or her specific rights, which included: “You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Essay On Fifth Amendment

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages

    American Government When accused of a crime in the United States of America we have many rights protecting us so that we are innocent until proven guilty. These rights include our fourth, fifth, and sixth amendments of the Constitution. Our fourth amendment protects us from illegal search and seizure of our properties. Our fifth amendment protects us from being accused of any capital crime without being tried in front of a grand jury. The fifth amendment also includes the right of due process which is our right to be treated fairly through a trial process.…

    • 1549 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays