Double Jeopardy Case Study

Improved Essays
In regards to basic criminal procedures, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution contains some very important basic rights which enable citizens to have protection against the government. These rights consist of the following; due process, substantive due process, Miranda warning, indictment, self-incrimination, grand jury, jury, double jeopardy, and collateral estoppel, immunity from prosecution, eminent domain, takings, and lastly territorial jurisdiction. Nevertheless, this investigation will cover the basic and many varied interpretations of double jeopardy and how they applied to the local case of Robert Nicholas Angleton. Double jeopardy is within the United States Constitutions Fifth Amendment, “The State with all its …show more content…
Before the couple had married, they were married to other people; they had met briefly at Roberts’s place of business. Robert Angleton made a majority of his living bookmaking, most of the proceeds being obtained illegally the couple and their two children lived an extravagant life within the River Oaks community here in Harris County Texas. The Angleton’s lived in a lovely home, their children attended private school, Doris Angleton had a very pleasant and outgoing personality that led her to being a popular socialite who had many friends; her husband on the other hand was viewed as being “rough around the edges”. Those who were around the Angleton’s were unaware of how Robert made his living and those that did know did not seem to regard it as being “illegal”. Robert Angleton was said to have been an excellent provider for his family and doted on his family regularly with expensive gifts, it was said that his wife, Doris was beginning to grow lonely within their marriage and had reached out to chatroom websites in an attempt to cure her loneliness and eventually ended up meeting someone in person. Tension began to spread within their marriage and Doris had filed for divorce, requesting half of the couples combined assets, the couple was attempting to remain cordial with one another and were attending counseling together all had seemed well or at least was portrayed to seem well. Doris Angleton made a trip home to pick up a softball bat that was forgotten and did not return to the game. Later on, Robert Angleton dropped his children off after their softball game and discovered the body of his wife Doris Angleton who had been shot thirteen times there were no signs of forced entry into the home. However, during their marriage together, it was also rumored that Roberts brother Roger Angleton had made

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Garrity vs. New Jersey Case Study Critique One Tracey Green CJUS 530 Liberty University ABSTRACT The Fifth Amendment establishes various rights within the criminal and civil courts. When it comes to criminal cases the Fifth Amendment guarantees the right to a grand jury and prevents double jeopardy and it also protects against self-incrimination. Also, it implements due process to be a part of any legal proceedings that would deny a citizen life, liberty or property and requires the government to compensate a citizen when private property is taken for public use.…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal has the privilege to have a sensible safeguard set for the wrongdoing he or she perpetrated and as indicated by the genuine flight hazard which he or she may force. In 1963 a man known as Ernesto Arturo Miranda was captured of charges he actually admited nightfall of interrigation, and was sentenced, and sentenced 20-30 years. Miranda's court apointed lawyer contended taht he was not educated he has a privilege to insight, and his admission was not volontary. The Arizona Incomparable Court ruled upon this case, and announced that Miranda was unconscious of the rights allowed under the fifth amendent's self implication provision, and the sixth alterations right to a lawyer.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Salinas Vs Texas Summary

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    CASE BRIEF Case Name – Salinas v. Texas, 570 U.S. 12 (2013) Facts – Genovevo Salinas, the petitioner, who was not in custody or read Miranda warnings, agreed to go to the police station to answer questions regarding involvement in a murder. When petitioner was asked if ballistic testing would match ammunition casings found at the scene, he remained silent. Petitioner contended that the prosecutors’ use of his silence to indicate guilt violated his Fifth Amendment rights. Procedural History – The petitioner was charged in Texas state court with murder.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Greenlease Kidnapping An Institute for small children in Kansas City, Missouri called Sister Morad of the French of Notre Dame De Sion was having school on September 28, 1953. As the children were having school, there was a knock at the door and as one of the teachers opened the door to a woman who said she was the Aunt of Bobby Greenlease. Robert Cosgrove Greenlease Jr., refer to as Bobby, was the six-year-old son of Robert C Greenlease Sr. Robert Sr. was a weathly automobile dealer who resided in Mission Hill, Kansas City, Missouri. Bobby’s Aunt informed the teacher that Bobby’s mother had suffered a heart attack and taken to St. Mary’s Hospital.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Conviction On the morning of August 10, 1984, Deborah Sykes was brutally stabbed, sexually assaulted, and eventually killed in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. The man convicted for her murder was Darryl Hunt, a 19 year old boy that would go on to spend 20 years in prison for a crime he did not commit. Hunt was convicted based on eye-witness testimony and informants, but was later exonerated based on DNA evidence that matched a man that was caught just a few months after the murder took place. This case is an exemplar of the strength of DNA evidence and the fragility of eyewitness testimony.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    As the nation has evolved, the interpretation of the Constitution has varied. While the Sixth Amendment has been largely upheld in most domestic cases, in fact it has routinely been denied to those who are entitled to its protection when the government deems the situation as a threat to national security. Similarly, the understanding of the Eighth Amendment has been strictly interpreted in matters of domestic law, but the meaning is deviated from in cases where national security has taken the…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the early 1960’s four men were arrested on different crimes.. In the police department those men confessed to their crimes without ever being told their rights, mainly that the Fifth Amendment Sixth Amendment. The confessions were used in court, and it became a question of whether those men’s constitutional rights had been violated. The question was answered in the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona.…

    • 1601 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once a state has created a law and it has been determined to be constitutional, the enforcement process lends itself to judicial scrutiny when brought before the court. When the process of enforcement and the discovery of evidence have been put into motion, the circumstance surrounding how law enforcement came into contact with the accused is one of the first things reviewed - much of the initial interaction is based on the enforcement of State laws, which cascades into protected rights when the enforcement effort starts, or elements of a crime have been discovered. Since the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the Bill of Rights applies the Federal Government, and the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause makes the Bill of Rights applicable…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hurst Court Case

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The right of due process is one of the most characterizing features that embody the spirit of American liberty. Can anyone imagine a world without constitutional protections, provided for the accused, against arbitrary accusations? Before the establishment of the United States’ Constitution, the founding fathers of America understood that rights inherently bestowed unto the people are rights that should be protected by government institutions. The right against cruel and unusual punishment and the right to a trial by jury are just two of the several protections offered to Americans by the Constitution. In the case Hurst v. State of Florida, Timothy Hurst was charged, convicted, and sentenced to death for the murder of Cynthia Harrison at the…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Powell V. Alabama Case

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments were established to protect the rights of the suspected, the accused, criminal defendants and that of convicted criminals. There have been several instances of the course time where these protections of rights haven’t been upheld. An example of when these protections of rights have been neglected is the Powell v. Alabama in 1932. There are several things that made this particular case so different from that of other cases. The time period, the series of events in the case, and the doctrines that were established during this time period are just a few to mention.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    History Of Dual Federalism

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It took 30 years before the Supreme Court nationalized protection against Double Jeopardy, and it was already too late. • Right to counsel in trial. Besides the rights of a speedy trial, of been informed of the charges and to confront the witnesses before a trial, the Eight Amendment provides the right to counsel in any trial. In the famous case of Gideon v. Wainwright, a man convicted on a breaking and entering charge spend his five years in jail being a “jailhouse lawyer”. He even wrote his own appeal, and won the right to counsel in all felony…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The PATRIOT Act was framed swiftly and passed within 45 days to serve as an anti-terrorism legislation in wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, in the name of national security. The complex Act was subject to almost no Congressional deliberation or debate and was promulgated by the then President George Washington Bush on 26 October, 2001. This Act was designed to extend law enforcement's supervision and surveillance and investigative powers. The provisions of the Patriot Act also are some of the most significant threats and breaches to civil liberties, privacy, and democratic traditions which have been embodied in the US history and Constitution.1 The Patriot Act, although framed to protect the American citizens from terrorism, has been criticized for a number of reasons and rightly so. Certain provisions of the Act stand contrary to the…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution is one of the important section for protecting citizens for committing a crime unless it is properly indicted by a law enforcement officer. The Fifth Amendment states that no person shall be held accountable for a serious except a grand jury decides that the evidence presented is then an indictment is issued. State and the country must respect your legal rights under the United States Constitution. The Fifth Amendment was established on September 5, 1789 as part of the Bill of Rights with ¾ of the states’ vote. The government does not have the authority to force an individual to testify against themselves, so the court uses witness and evidences on the accused suspect.…

    • 235 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land made up of the 7 articles and the U.S. Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is a document with a group of Amendments, which are articles added to the U.S Constitution. The Fifth Amendment was introduced into the U.S Constitution on September 5th, 1789. The five clauses within the Fifth Amendment stay consistent with the meaning of the Bill of Rights in that they promote a balance between the people and the government, and limits on government power and procedure. The Fifth Amendment contains five protections vital to a person accused of crime; the right to Grand Jury, to double jeopardy charges, compelled self-incrimination, due process, and just compensation.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays