Do's And Don Ts Case

Improved Essays
Case #3: Do’s & Don’ts
1.) The police arrest you in your living room on charges of murder. May they open the door of your coat closet to make sure that no one is hiding there? May they open the door to your medicine cabinet?
- Yes to the first and no to the second. Reasonable belief must be established before any area within a crime scene maybe searched. In regards to the medicine cabinet there is no reasonable belief that an accomplice for example is hiding in said structure which would endanger the safety of the officer/s at the scene. Whereas the coat closet does hold the possibility of hiding an armed accomplice which could potentially place the lives of the officers in endanger their fore during the protective sweep of the domicile the closet can be checked under these circumstances.
2.) You have a semi-automatic rifle that you
…show more content…
- Yes a warrantless search is permitted in these private dwellings. The reason said search may occur is because while in “hot pursuit” of a criminal an officer must continue to maintain the safety of him/herself as well as the public’s. Therefore in keeping with this goal if a criminal were to run through a public dwelling then its security has been compromised which puts the officer and the public in danger which warrants a security sweep of the premises. (when necessary)
6.) The police have a warrant to search your basement for evidence of a drug manufacturing operation. On their way through your house to go down to the basement, they see a cache of guns sitting on the kitchen table. May they seize the guns without a warrant?
- Yes they may. The guns may be seized so as to protect the safety of the officers during and after the legal search of the crime scene. (This also falls under regulations of the plain view

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Chief Hamilton Case Study

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages

    We then drove eastbound on Ne 120th Street and Detective Davidson stated, “There he is.” I had the sun in my eyes and did not see him at first and asked Detective Davidson, “Where?” I then saw the male walking westbound in the parking lot of an office building in the 11400 block of NE 118th ST. Detective Davidson stopped the car in the middle of the road and we both exited the vehicle, drew and pointed our department issued firearms at the male. Detective Davidson yelled to the male, “Police stop!”…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wilson Vs Arkansas

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Issue- Whether it was reasonable under the 4th amendment for the officers to enter a home without a warrant. Rule- Knock and Announce rule law enforcement has to knock and announce that they are police and wait a reasonable amount of time, usually seconds, before entering place before they search. (Wilson v Arkansas)…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this instance, it is constitutional for the officer to ask the four men to step out of the car, seize them, and search them. A car is considered public in that it can travel from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and therefore there is…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The third warrantless search the police did was in Weeks room and they found more evidence. After the three warrantless Weeks decided to file a suit to not use the evidence they illegally…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The police officers found evidence of drug use in the trash. They then used this evidence to obtain a search warrant, a legal document permitting the searching of property by police or the government, to search Mr. Greenwood's home. Once inside they found evidence of drug use and trafficking.…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fourth Amendment Warrants

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages

    As followed, searches incident to arrest do not require a warrant if the search is in radius of the suspect. The officer may search the surrounding area for illegal contraband or weapons. Ultimately, to protect the officers around as well as to collect valuable…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, a citizen should make sure that the address and name that appears on the warrant in accurate to that domicile. If is not, then no one should enter the house for any means. Second, a citizen should check to see if it is sign by a judge in the state in which that person resides. More importantly, the citizen should read about the specifications that indicates what and where the officers can search. No one can look through a part of a house if it is not specify on the warrant.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After having failed in the previous attempt to enter the house, the officers forcibly go in using a purported search warrant and searched the home in which crude materials were found. The rule of law in scrutiny was the violation of the American Constitution as explained in the Fourth Amendment. The law termed all evidence collected in violation of this amendment to be unacceptable and irrelevant in the court proceedings. Question…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dk Dbq Analysis

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Since the search was done from outside of the home, it did not reveal any of the activities inside of this house. (Doc. C) According to Justice John Paul Stevens, “The officers’ conduct did not amount to a search and was perfectly reasonable…”. The imager did not go through the walls of the home, therefore it was not a search and did not require a warrant. (Doc. F)…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Moot Court Case

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The Fourth Amendment was created by our Founding Fathers for this exact reason. If a police officer can conduct a warrantless search without receiving adequate consent then our Fourth Amendment right to privacy will continue to be violated, a violation our great Constitution does not permit. In Matlock, the court decided that a third party could give consent to search if they had common authority over the object or premises. U.S. v. Matlock, 415 S. Ct. 164, 171 (1974).…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides, "[t]he right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized”( Interests Protected law.cornell.edu). Probable cause is if there something that's easily to tell that something's wrong or not right. Like if it's a murder scene or they can smell drugs or smell alcohol in the car. But very many cases are being dismissed because of the failure of the use of a search warrant. Even though that really isn’t a good thing it assures you because of the fourth amendment you can't go to prison because it’s a cop's word against a civilians.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After finding out the officers violated the 4th amendment the judgment of this court was reversed. In order for this search to be legal there would have to be a good reason to search the house. This reason would be used to try to get a search warrant. Because they did not get a warrant, it is illegal. Even if the evidence is strong, it is not allowed to be used in…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some critical-conflict theorists believe that social problems arise from the major contradictions inherent in the capitalist economies. What part do guns play in a capitalist economy? This question can be answered in a few different ways, one way would be to look at the laws governing the sale and distribution of firearms. While another way, would be looking at the different companies that make the firearms. Though the role guns play in a capitalist economy can’t be defined just by the laws and manufacturers.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the scenario, there are three types of people or things involved the police, the courts and corrections. Now with each one of these things someone who works as a correctional officer, a police officer or a judge can use discretion in order to do their job to the best of their ability. However, it is stated that discretion is the power or right to decide or act according to one’s own judgment; freedom of judgment or choice (dictionary.com. n.d.). Therefore, when it comes to a police officer using his or her discretion in order to get consent to search the house versus an actual search warrant would have really changed the outcome of the scenario. The reason for this is because if he or she had search the house with the consent of the suspect…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The statement, “The Fourth Amendment protects people, not places,” is one of the most controversial statements in Criminal Procedure. The amendment’s purpose is to secure individuals’ rights to privacy within their houses, papers, and defends them against unreasonable searches and seizures. However, to what extent does the law preserve a person’s privacy? The Law of Search and Seizure and the Search Warrant, give the government strict to stipulations as to how they are able to rightfully obtain information that is presumed to be private. Although Searches, Seizures and Warrants seem to have simple guidelines, they are each intricate categories.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays