Difference Between Donkeys And Democrats

Improved Essays
Who rules the world better: donkeys or elephants? This is the ongoing question between the elephants, Republicans, and donkeys, Democrats, of the world. While Republicans are more conservative than democrats they both help not only America, but the whole world, to be better in their own unique way. All leaders differ in opinion on a wide variety of issues, but tax cuts and social issues are two of the main disputes. Taking into consideration that not every leader of either political party has the same morals or goals as the other, makes a big difference in which type of leader is best. Just because both the democratic and republican parties have vastly different opinions on the way issues should be handled does not mean one type of leader is …show more content…
How each issue is handled again comes back to the commanding officer. If the present leader is a Democrat, but is on the more conservative side than they may handle the issue differently than an extreme liberal. On the other hand, if a more liberal Republican leader handles would handle the situation a lot differently than an extreme conservative would. The topic of gay marriage is a very controversial issue between the two parties. Due to strong religious values, Republicans put down gay marriage because they believe only a man and woman should be allowed to wed. (“Republican Views Gay Marriage”) When it comes to having a family, they strongly believe that having both a male and female figure is the healthiest way for a child to be raised. (“Republican Views Gay Marriage”) Differently, Democrats fully support gay marriage and fully believe in the statement given by First Lady Michelle Obama that "if proud Americans can be who they are and boldly stand at the altar with who they love...then surely, surely we can give everyone in this country a fair chance at that American dream.” (Huffington Post). Onto another area of disagreement, abortion. While Republicans are pro-life, Democrats are pro-choice. Republicans accept as true that “no human being should be considered the property of another.” (“Republican Party”) Thus, based off the fourteenth amendment, woman should not …show more content…
Although not every move made by either Democrat or Republican presidents is excessively good or bad they both influence society positively in some way. The turnout of the decisions made, solely depends on the way the leader implements them. While both parties help with a multitude of issues the following examples of polar opposite presidents prove that even completely different types of rulers can achieve greatness. Jimmy Carter, the most liberal president to have ever taken office, increased human and social services by founding the Department of Education, strengthening the Social Security system, and acquiring Government jobs for struggling women, blacks, and Hispanics while in office.(“Ranking”) (Freidel) He also helped create new public health approaches to prevent or control diseases in differing countries.(Freidel) On the other hand, Bush Jr. the most conservative Republican president that has ever taken office, improved the world in a completely different way. During Bush’s first term as the 49th president of the United States, he was able to help repair the broken economy with a major tax cut. (Biography) During Bush’s second term he pushed immigration reforms, reduced environmental regulations, and launched economic initiatives to prevent collapses and foreclosures. (Biography) While both presidents are entirely opposite in opinion, both

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Against Gay Marriage

    • 1603 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There’s No Reason For Gay Marriage To Not Be Legalized People in this society think it is wrong to take advantage of marriage. According to Bible standards, the definition of marriage is to be between one man and woman (Marriage Equality in The New Republic). With same-sex couples or heterosexual couples, everyone shares the same value of love and commitment (Olson), therefore, everyone should be treated equally. The gay marriage issue affects society in several ways. One of those ways is that other people believe that gay couples want to break the marriage rule.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States is such a melting pot and there 's so many different races which means there 's many different religions, and some say that homosexual relationships are a sin, such as Islam, Catholics, and Christians all believe this. Reform Judaism is the only religion that accepts same-sex couples. People of these religions also believe that homosexuality is a choice, and that you 're not born gay. "Many opponents of gay marriage argue that homosexuality is a choice which therefore makes the gay rights movement unlike any other civil rights movement." ("Do People Deserve the Same Rights" 10) The most common view on marriage is that it 's between a man and a woman.…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In conclusion, Jordan wanted the state to restrict same-sex marriage but allow private homosexual acts between consenting adults (April Elliot). David Boonin does not believe that Jeffrey Jordan’s argument is sound here. Boonin’s thoughts on same-sex marriages are that governments should sanction them and that people should have the right to marry whomever they want. Boonin adds that Jordan’s second claim is problematic because he does not do a good job of distinguishing the public disagreement. Jordan speaks of the public dilemma as two distinct subjects of disagreement (Rachels).…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “No decade in the twentieth century painted a more distinct and powerful image of America than the 1960’s” (Brinkley, 720). At the beginning of this decade, President John F. Kennedy took office as a young and strong liberal leader. He had countless dreams and ideas of what he wanted to accomplish during his term. Those ideas included federal aid for education, tax cuts to stimulate the economy, civil rights acts, government regulated medical care, and the creation of the Peace Corps. He soon faced congressional resistance and many of these new ideas failed which caused him to back off.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While politicians on both the left and right would agree that a consumer needs to be protected by law, Roosevelt did something most conservatives would never think of; he supported the creation of a new government program. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was created in 1906 under the Pure Foods and Drugs Act. This was really just one example as to how Teddy Roosevelt was a big government politician, which associates himself with more liberal-minded politicians.This ties in with his trust busting. He busted those trusts to prove that the government was more powerful than businesses. Once again, I would say that he is liberal on this…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage will always be something worthy of same-sex couples whether certain Christians believe so or not. The common argument for Christians opposing same-sex marriage is that it goes against the laws of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many citizens decided to split ticket vote if they did not think he was doing well as president, but Obama still won the election with 65,899,660 popular votes and 332 electoral college votes. There were also two less states that he won than in his first election. After Obama served two terms, some people felt that they had to “repair” and get rid of what Obama had accomplished. Hence, a Republican candidate was elected by the people, promising to “Make America Great Again”! This is a prime example of political polarization, as the parties pretty much are just going towards each other, and trying to make America how they want it, with no exceptions.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What does the success of Jefferson and the failure of Adams teach us in a modern political context? Is a bottom-up leadership style still more effective and desirable in a president than a top-down one? Though the rise of Trump and Sanders shows that an Adamsian style can be very effective in an election year, the immense unpopularity of the second Bush administration (strongly Adamsian in style), and the overwhelming nostalgia for Bill Clinton (who has occasionally been compared to Jefferson) that can be found in many, seems to demonstrate the durability of Jefferson’s more passive style. The actual presidential leadership skills of Trump and Sanders and those of that ilk remain untested. It’s worth noting that the Jeffersonian style is far more popular among those in the race with actual executive experience – all governors (with the exception of Chris Christie) in the running have exhibited a relatively soft-spoken, thoughtful style.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gun Control Good Or Bad

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This is very surprising especially for the Republican’s side due to their conservative nature and how both them and the Democratic Party butt-heads about most thing. To be able to find a compromise that both parties are willing to accept is a very big deal and should therefore not be ignored. With background checking to be the most popular solution to the issue on gun control, it is usually hard to find a citizen who disagrees with this solution since the process is efficient and practical. Though even with the amount of support that background checks have from almost all citizens, there are loopholes within the…

    • 1534 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    There have been different opinions about the felons’ voting rights, but the fact that a majority of them may be Democrats makes those of the opposite party hesitant about the race for president. The balance of parties is an important factor in the new felons’ voting law because that is what is making controversy. So, if there was any way to prove that this law is being carried out in solely a partisan way, then maybe there would be more people for the law rather than against it. The Republican party and Democratic party seem to be in conflict with one another over the right for felons to vote, which is seen as a demand in the systems model. However, some people, such a Governor McAuliffe, are in complete support of this new law which is seen as the…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays