Donald Trump And The Anti-Federalist Analysis

Improved Essays
Written 230 years apart, President Donald Trump’s speech and the ideas expressed by the Anti-Federalists share some similar ideas. These ideas include subsidiarity as the most effective way of running an organization, momentum, and unity and identity. In President Donald Trump’s address to the Boy Scouts at the National Jamboree, he expresses views and ideas consistent with those of the Anti-Federalists. Trump tells the story of William Levitt, who was a successful small business owner who was bought out by a “big conglomerate.” that “didn’t know anything about building homes […] and after about a ten year period they were losing a lot with it.” This large company—a conglomerate as Trump describes it—did not have the attention to detail, and was spread too thin over different industries to have the knowledge and expertise to run Levitt’s business. The Anti-Federalist’s showed similar sentiments towards the federal government’s ability to govern all of the people, through representation a of the people. It is said by the …show more content…
When Trump asked him what happened, Levitt responded, “Donald, I lost my momentum.” The states, according to the Anti-Federalists, are “[making] rapid advancements towards independence in resources as well as in empire.” Trump goes on to say that losing momentum is “a [phrase] that you never hear when you’re talking about success.” The Anti-Federalists mention something similar, saying that “if we adopt the new system of government we shall by one rash vote lose the fruit of the toil and expense of thirteen years.” This is the view of the Anti-Federalists on momentum. The Anti-Federalists believe that the collection of states is moving in the direction towards being a stable community, and has no need of a federal, uniting government. Unity however, is an important aspect of the states, and should be

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Which in the long run was only helping his friends in Wall Street. Now the Federalist didn't want to have the central government to have more power than it did in the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist worked hard…

    • 364 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To this day, both sides, Anti-Federalist and Federalist, sound persuasive. The Anti-Federalists focused on the American want for local governments that respond directly to popular concerns. The Federalists argued that only a national government could really protect the people’s rights and turn the new nation into a great power. But more than just this are many other issues including that smaller states, who feel that they are operating just fine, will get the short end of the straw.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Article V Compromise

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He discusses how the introduction to Kenyon 's book includes an analysis of the principles the Antifederalists held and the reasons for those beliefs. The delegates who were states ' rights advocates did not believe that a national government would stay a republic, but would eventually turn oppressive. Therefore, they turned to increasing the power of the states in order to prevent a governmental structure they believed would turn into a tyrannical federal…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Katie Beal Mr.Kreimer Government 13 October Patrick Henry I’m Patrick Henry and I am an Anti-Federalist because I am strongly against the Constitution. I didn't like the fact that it didn't have a Bill Of Rights for the states, and I feared that it gave the government way too much power. I thought that it would trample the rights of the states. I opposed the creation of a stronger U.S. federal government and I now I am opposing the ratification of the constitution. I am ashamed to see that this is even becoming an option when I; myself fought so hard to get us independence.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Apush Dbq Analysis

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federalist prevailed because they identified the proper path to American prosperity. Centralization is an imperative facet of a successful national government, thus eliminating governmental dissention between states. A sectionalist government was not adequate for the United Sates, a newborn nation requiring unity. The Federalists and Republican debate can be justifiably attributed as the fountainhead of the political party system. The ratification of the Constitution outlines the powers and rights of the government, ensuring the citizens free from oppression and tyranny.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the Federalist shard many of the same ideas of the Antifederalist such as individual rights (Oaks 223). The Anti-Federalists shared different view on how the government should be ran. Because of their experiences with the tyranny of Great Britain, they feared the establishment of a strong national government. The Anti-Federalists also did not accept the use of separation of powers and checks and balances, because they feared the branches of government would abuse the power and not serve the purpose of protecting the rights and freedoms of the individuals. It was evident in the way they thought things should be ran and why they thought they where right, being that they where from a old-line of republicans and did not favor a system…

    • 130 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Shay's Rebellion

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Anti-Federalists feared a powerful government would oppress the people. They argued that the new constitution was too much like the powerful British Monarchy. Anti-federalist thought the power should remain with the states and local governments.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The New Constitution

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited

    In order to resolve the differences, delegates from the majority of the states met at the Annapolis Convention in 1786. But they were not able to reach any agreeable conclusion. That led them to decide to meet again later in Philadelphia. In second convention, delegates observed that there is urgent need to frame an entirely new constitution. A key issue of conflict was the structure of the new legislative branch.…

    • 970 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 7 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On the other hand, anti-federalists felt that states should retain more of their independence in the new nation. In essence, they believe that every country should have the right to establish laws within its borders and should not be required to follow the mandates of the federal government unless absolutely necessary. Over time, states rights often will crash with various federal government action was taken. Arguments arose over taxation, tariffs, internal improvements, military, and of course, slavery. Northern victory in the war saved the United States as a nation and ended the institution of slavery, which divided the country since its inception.…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In his speech to Congress on February 10, 1863 Senator Sherman said, “ The policy of this country ought to be to make everything national as far as possible; to nationalize our country so that we shall love our country.” Senator Sherman is saying here that everything should be run by the central government, and if this happens the country will become more united with people who love and support it. Sherman and much of the North supported the theory that if each state has too much power the country will never unite and without a strong central government the country would…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Federalists’ attempt to stifle the volatile passions of the public in the federal institutions is an example which will no doubt soon find its way into states, counties, and townships. The constitutional doctrine of placing faith in structures rather than people will result in a mass erosion of citizens’ power. Tocqueville explains this saying, “left to themselves, the institutions of the township can scarcely struggle against an enterprising and strong government…it is easy to destroy it” (Tocqueville, 56). But while the constitutional system makes for good government it does not make for good citizens. Had the Federalists kept the people “strong and independent, they fear partitioning social power and exposing the state to anarchy.…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Author Mark Twain stated, “Loyalty to the Nation all the time, loyalty to government when it deserves it”. In his farewell address, George Washington expressed the importance of putting America above any local or foreign identity. We disagree with Washington's absolute take on patriotism as this may create a populous which blindly adopts the decree of an unjust government. A big concern during the time of Washington’s farewell address was the fear of Americans identifying more closely with their states than with the national government.…

    • 709 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Anti-Federalists had the better argument overall because they had clear instances showing how a strong central government could become corrupt and lose interest in its citizens. They wanted the power to stay in the states because it would allow more control over what was happening within the nation and it would give citizens more protected rights. In the end, after several debates between the groups, they agreed on creating the Bill of Rights, which gave the citizens protected rights. In addition, they agreed on forming one central government that was made up of three branches, all with restricted powers because of the checks and balances between them.…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Trumpism

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Battles over who deserves to be an American citizen has always been a prominent debate in American society; this is especially true now. With the rise of “Trumpism,” violent rhetoric has propelled an anti-immigrant demagogue to power. Trump, who has scapegoated immigrants; particularly of Muslim and Mexican descent has labeled them as terrorists and rapists, and has called for a wall along the US, Mexico boarder, as well as calls for a ban on Muslims entering the United States. His rhetoric which has resulted in growing anti-immigrant sentiment is likely to lead to sanctuary cities, which are jurisdiction “that limit their cooperation with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)” (Mazorati 1) losing federal funding, for not complying with…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    AJ Siciliano, Federalists Vs. Anti-Federalists Essay Before the ratification of the constitution, two original political parties fell consistent during the 1700’s, Federalists and Antifederalists. In shorter terms, Federalists wanted a stronger central government to have overall power of the states, rather the Antifederalists wanted something similar to the Articles of Confederation, where the states as individuals, had more power than the central government. Both, although strongly contrasting, contained one main similarity, thirst for the creation of a new country, just with different ideas of how it should function.…

    • 1080 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays