Don T Forget: Bombing The Islamic State Will Kill Innocent People Too

Improved Essays
I heard the sirens as I ran upstairs. My old dog was found dead in my grandparents backyard in his doghouse. My grandfather told me people beat the dog up because he was always howling at night. Is killing another justifiable? No, because killing one another is not a justifiable act. Killing is a sin, which can be a terrible emotion that always makes us feel guilty about ourselves. There are other more moral solutions.

In the case of military ethics, It is Very unethical To knowing kill civilians during battles. Knowingly can be explained as “The people tasked with war-fighting is essential both to how we “justify” war and how we help to contribute to the suffering of war fighters”(Nolen). This shows us that in wars, it’s necessary to make war fighters suffer because they are tasked to do so like they have no choice. According to the article “Don't Forget: Bombing The Islamic State Will Kill Innocent People Too”. “The right of a country to defend itself against aggression is recognized by both national and international laws”(Sekar). Killing is not justifiable, killing to defend your country is not a nice way to settle things.
…show more content…
Criminals and murders are different this would probably differ. “Murders That don't happen because criminals are deterred by the prospect of being executed can’t systematically tallied”(Jacoby). Death penalties are very dangerous for murderers and criminals because they won't get caught. From the article “Death May Soon Wither And Die”. “Today 105 out of 192 countries in the United States have abolished the death penalty by law”(marazziti). This would be a great opportunity for the poor,sick, and innocent people who doesn't suffer To see the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rumor Of War DBQ Essay

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages

    When fighting in the war, killing someone is considered normal which in turn Also there is the idea of being at war in a foreign country, secluded, and not living a normal everyday life could be responsible for soldiers losing touch with reality, and that reality is feeling emotion for others and…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Darkness of human kind is the main common theme between Lord of the Flies and The Second Coming. The Second Coming, a poem by William Yeats, does not have as strong a portrayal of the darkness of human kind than in Lord of the Flies, a novel by William Golding. With no government presence, disarray can spread amongst a group of people quite quickly. Once the unruliness spreads it does not take long for humans to realize that they have the potential to kill fellow living things or people. Both of the texts represent how without rules chaos will relinquish upon a society.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Killing murderers may sound like the easiest way out of the problem. That is not exactly the truth, it brings more problems because capital punishment is expensive. The book Just Revenge: Cost and Consequences of the Death Penalty by Mark Costanzo states how expensive it is to give a prisoner the death penalty. Just to keep a prisoner in life imprisonment without parole (LWOP) is from $750,000 to $1.1 million per prisoner (Costanzo, pg. 60).…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics means doing the right action, based off virtue ethics. To support this definition the novella excerpt “Lather And Nothing Else”, the article “Who Will Save The Savior Siblings”, and the song “Independence Day” all demonstrate virtuous ethics. Initially, killing is wrong because virtuously killing is not temperament. Hernando Tellez persuades revolutionists to not go against his or her morals in the novella excerpt “Lather and Nothing Else,”.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The world has become a place of utter chaos, a place where you constantly have to look over your shoulder, that is not any way someone should live. The world took a radical turn back in 1933, if the date sounds familiar, it should be. That is the date when the horrific events of the Holocaust began. Thinking back to all of the innocent people that lost their lives and didn’t have a clue what was happening should make a person feel the least bit angry, or wish that people had gotten more involved sooner. All of or most of the survivors (while it was still going on) tried to warn people, but people wouldn’t listen and they stayed silent about it.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Covenant Structure

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the structure of a covenant, and use God’s covenant with Moses as an example (Page 84, #2; 3 Marks) The covenant structure consists of the preamble, the historical prologue, the submission, the witness as well as the blessings and curses. The following traits is displayed in the covenant made by God and Moses at Mt. Sinai (Exodus 19:3-8). A treaty usually begins with the name, titles and attributes of both parties making the agreement (the preamble). The relationship between the two parties taking part will then recount the benefits given to each party, an essential part of the covenant (the historical prologue) as it unifies and seals that the agreement has been made.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marquis and the Immorality of Abortion There are few topics that are as fraught with tension as abortion; it is easily one of the most politically divisive topics. Nine out of ten liberal Democrats say it should be legal in all or most cases, and seven out of ten conservative Republicans say it should be illegal in all or most cases (Pew Research). It is fiercely debated by philosophers and laymen alike in daily life, academic circles, and in state and federal Supreme Courts, and many an individual has crafted an argument supporting or rejecting it. Don Marquis is one of those individuals. He argues against abortion from an angle known as the valuable future view, and his argument is seen as one of the most secular and reasonable anti-abortionist…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Even though violence is meant to destroy, violence is justified in order to achieve lawfulness because all sensible violence is a sought to achieve justice, sometimes violence is a compromise in and of itself. The most obvious answer people give to why violence is wrong is because violence quite simply destroys; however, if you consider justice as the destruction of injustice, then violence can be justified. All violence with any amount of reason behind it, is sought for the purpose of justice in one way or another. A dictator would attack his own people in order to stimulate the economy, because he feels that he or his country deserves better.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Deterrence has been around for ages, well at least since the 1700’s or so, and in this time they would broadcast the offender in front of the whole town along with letting everyone know what he/she did to deserve this. For the more serious offenses such as, murder and treason, criminals were hung or sentenced to death in some manner. Amid the eighteenth century, the quantity of violations that were rebuffed by hanging rose to around 200. In this time people were less sympathetic than they were in years to come, seeing as at the time of the hanging the air about it was festive, and among all of the chaos, quite often there were riots that broke out in the crowd. There was regularly sensitivity for the individual going to be hanged and the group…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abstract Suicide bombings is a strategy designed to strike fear, intimidation, and increase opportunities of political or a religious victory. These attacks gives smaller militant groups power to coerce larger governments politically. Suicide attacks are favored as they can have a better success in penetrating hard secure targets. I think they are not mad and they as most people may not know are normal, intelligent, deeply integrated into the social networks, and connected to their communities. We tend to miss label them as sick, poor, desperate to join a cause, and even driven by revenge to utilize that as a motivation behind their reasoning.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Obviously the best way to prove killing is wrong is with more killing, right? Of course not, it's this level of hypocrisy that attempts to justify murder regardless of the context. The death penalty is barbaric and the fact that it's still in use today is utterly surprising. There are numerous reasons as to why it's wrong, it has no effect on crime rates, it's hypocritical, and there's a chance that innocent people can be wrongly executed. Numerous studies have been conducted on whether the death penalty has an effect on crime rates.…

    • 304 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the United States Capital Punishment is the sentencing of a convict that has committed a serious crime such as murder. Capital Punishment is also known as the death penalty. Once a judge sentences a convict to death penalty the process begins. The inmate now waits his or her turn on death row. An executioner is assigned to carry out the death process with lethal injection.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    7. Critically evaluate Thomson’s account of when killing in self-defence is morally permissible. Introduction The question of whether ever morally permissible to kill in self-defence is difficult as there can be so many combinations.…

    • 1650 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to article Capital punishment states, “some crimes are so heinous and inherently wrong that they demand strict penalties—up to and including life sentences or even death," (par,8). They believe that the death penalty is effective and preventive to violent crime because criminals will now think twice before committing a murder. " Recent investigations, using a variety of samples and statistical methods, consistently demonstrate a strong link between executions and reduced murder rates," (capital, par.10). They believe having the inmate sit in jail is too expensive because it cost taxpayers “$31,286” per inmate annually (capital, par…

    • 1535 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If people are certain that they will be caught then they are less likely to engage in criminal activity. One of the very first deterrence studies looked at the states that used capital punishment and states that did not have the death penalty (Akers et al, 2017). The studies found that having the death penalty did not decrease the homicide rate which means that the severity did not affect whether or not individuals…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays