Dolan V. United States Postal Service Case Summary

Improved Essays
In the case Dolan v. United States Postal Service, Barbara Dolan filed a suit against the United States Postal Service for injuries she incurred after tripping over some mail that was delivered on her porch by the United States Postal Service. The U.S. Government claimed that they had sovereign immunity in this case. The waivers of sovereign immunity for the Postal Service are as follows "claims against the United States, for money damages, accruing on and after January 1, 1945, for injury or loss of property, or personal injury or death caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission of any employee of the Government while acting within the scope of his office or employment, under circumstances where the United States, if a private person, would be liable to the claimant in accordance with the law of the place where the act or omission occurred." 28 U.S.C. §1346(b)(1) (Dolan v. United States Postal Service). However, the exceptions of these waivers which give the Postal Service sovereign immunity are “any claim arising out of the loss, miscarriage, or negligent transmission of letters or postal matter.” (Dolan v. United States Postal Service). Both the District Court and the Court of Appeals dismissed the case, they both believed that the Postal Service had sovereign immunity because Dolan’s injuries were part of the …show more content…
However, Justice Thomas dissented and stated that he agreed with the prior courts’ rulings that the Postal Service did have sovereign immunity because Dolan’s injuries were part of the exception to the waiver “negligent transmission of mail” (Dolan v. United States Postal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The case that I researched involving the Uniform Commercial Code’s implied warranty of fitness for human consumption is the case of Tina Koperwas vs. Publix Supermarkets, Inc., and Doxsee Food Corporation. The facts of this case are Tina Koperwas, who purchased a can of Doxsee clam chowder at Publix store. When eating the chowder, she injured one of her molars when she bit down on a piece of clam shell. So Koperwas filed an action against Publix and Doxsee for breach of implied warranty of fitness for human consumption.…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I too think that having a gun on school grounds is a serious crime. In the case of United Sates v. Lopez it should have only been up to the state to punish him, but that wasn't the case. Lopez's crime should not have been punishable under the Commerce Crime and that was exactly what the ruling upheld. The Commerce Crime had nothing to do with the Gun Free School Zone Act and therefore it was unconstitutional. Great discussion.…

    • 79 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Citation: United States v. Jones, 565 U.S. ¬¬___ (2012). Parties: United States, Plaintiff / Appellant Antoine Jones, Defendant / Appellee Facts: Antoine Jones was a nightclub owner in the District of Columbia that was arrested in 2005 for drug possession after the police attached a GPS tracker to his vehicle. The tracker was attached to the vehicle because Jones was under suspicion of narcotics trafficking. The GPS tracker was authorized for use on the vehicle belonging to Jones’ wife although Jones was the primary driver. However, the police failed to comply with the warrant’s deadline and installed the GPS tracker on the vehicle anyway.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    I. Name: Sillasse Bryan v. United States II. Legal Citation: 524 U.S. 184 (1998) III. Statement of Facts: On trial was Mr. Sillasse Bryan for a conviction of “willfully” dealing guns without a federal license. The Firearms Owners' Protection Act (FOPA) was added to the Criminal Code to prohibit anyone from "willfully" dealing firearms without a federal license. If proven guilty of conviction, a fine or imprisonment may be imposed against anyone who "willfully" violates certain requirements of the Firearms Owners' Protection Act.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Reasoning: 1. The court’s ruling went on to state that government does hold the authority to have regulation intrastate commerce, with the assumption that it would have an adverse effect on…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Cantwell v. Connecticut case, Newton Cantwell and his two sons, Jesse and Russell, were convicted of two crimes that breached the Connecticut state law. The Cantwells were members of the Jehovah’s witnesses and claimed to be ordained ministers, due to their religious practices they believed that it was their duty to carry their messages to others. In order to spread their message, they carried along religious materials such as pamphlets, records, books, and also had a record player that played a recording called “Enemies”, which expressed Anti-Catholicism. The initial issue in this situation is the neighborhood the Cantwells were promoting their religion, Cassius Street of New Haven, is a heavily populated with Roman Catholics. Jesse Cantwell…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Elonis Vs Us Case Study

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Elonis v. United States 575 U.S. ___ (2015) CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 13 – 983 Argued December 1, 2014 – Decided June 1, 2015 Apples to: First Amendment Facts: After his wife left him, Anthony Elonis used Facebook to post his own rap lyrics. Along with his wife, his co-worker, boss, a kindergarten class, and an FBI agent were all mentioned in his lyrics.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Garrett Vs Fisher

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages

    I represent the Respondent, and request of the court to affirm the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The legal standard is intermediate scrutiny. In order to disprove negligence, the challenged classification must serve an important state interest and is at least substantially related to serving that interest.…

    • 1297 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    So the final answer was the most important, the final answer was, “Yes he is entitled to the remedy, but why does he need it, and does the court really have the power to give him the writ. This question proposed conflict between Article 3 of the constitution and the Jud. Act of…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fisher Vs Texas

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas filed concurring…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Grutter Vs Bollinger

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Court noted that it was not deciding to overrule Grutter because it had not been asked to do so, leaving open that possibility for a future case. The Fisher decision is certain to spawn more…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a matter of public policy, an employer shall not be required to be reinstate an unlawfully terminated employee when the employee is an illegal alien. If an employer was to have to reinstate an illegal alien, they would be violation of the Immigration Reform and Control Act. In 1986, the Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) passed in order to prohibit employers from knowingly hiring, recruiting, or referring for a fee any alien who is unauthorized to work (“Immigration Reform”, n.d.). The IRCA, signed under President Ronald Reagan, also allowed those employees to be given a pathway to citizenship (Rojas, 2013).…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What Amendment did you choose for your topic? Include the number and the text. The 2nd Amendment, The Right to Bear Arms MLA citation for the Bill of Rights (official government site): "The Bill of Rights: A Transcription." National Archives and Records Administration.…

    • 1587 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    his is the Supreme Court opinion in the case which involves the case of United States v. Fields. A man named, Abel Fields. who is a resident of California, is being tried for the Stolen Valor Act. In 2011. Abel Fields spoke publicly at a meeting he attend.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ralph Woodley and his son Harvey went to visit the local zoo. After spending few hours there visiting the various exhibits, they decided to visit one final exhibit building. Although this building looked like all the rest at the zoo, it was set apart from the majority. Upon walking up to the building, they spotted a large dog that seemed friendly at first and it nuzzled them. In a playful manner, the son made a snowball to throw at his father, who ducked and inadvertently the dog got hit.…

    • 1921 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays