Dogma Vs Indulgence Analysis

Dogma vs. Indulgence Dogma (1999) is an obscure comedy, which challenges the beliefs and ideas, or dogma, set out by Catholics in particular, but may also pertain to other faiths. The story is about two angels that get kicked out of Heaven, and they want to get back in. They find a way to get back, which in the method will forgive all their sins. Naturally they must be stopped, by the "Last Scion," (individuals who were the last member of a ruling house, or another prominent family, where heredity is the prime form of inheritance), and in this film, the scion refers to Jesus Christ. The last scion in Dogma is in the character of Bethany Sloan, a needy woman struggling through life. Accompanied by two unclear prophets, an apostle, and a muse. Bethany must stop the two fallen angels from getting back into Heaven, as this would prove God mistaken and humankind would be reversed since God is infallible; and the effects would be catastrophic. The foremost theory of the plenary indulgence is significant to the plot …show more content…
However, Loki and Bartleby think they’ve found a loophole: A church in New Jersey, with a papal endorsement, is celebrating it is not to hell, but to Wisconsin. But now Loki and Bartleby think they’ve found a loophole: A church in New Jersey, with a papal endorsement, is celebrating its centenary with a plenary indulgence to all who pass through the arched entranceway. All they have to do, the angel’s motive is to go through the arch; therefore, their sins will be forgiven; they will have a morally clean slate: stating, "No harm, and no foul." Then, they must lose their wings and "transubstantiate to pure human," and they’ll be able to die and go straight to heaven with a plenary indulgence to all who pass through the