However, Carr underestimates the massive source of knowledge that the internet has brought to people, overlooks humans’ responsibilities in using and controlling the internet and he also misses some internet’s advantages over printed books. This article, sad to say, has still not persuasively indicated a harm of the …show more content…
In this way, he just adds and adds another proof dryly with no emotion. For instance, “In an article published in Science last year” (217) and he states one evidence, then “In one experiment conducted at Cornell University” (217) and he states another evidence, continuously, “In another experiment, recently conducted at Stanford University 's Communication Between Humans and Interactive Media Lab” (218) and he keeps going. Throughout this article, he uses neutral tone and neutral language. Maybe this is a style of expository essay, but it is quite boring when