Does Judicial Philosophy Matter

Improved Essays
Final Paper: Thesis and Bibliography

Thesis: Not just liberals, but Supreme Court Justices across the political spectrum have invoked judicial activism one time or another.

Bibliography:

Dodrill, Fransisco J. Benzoni & Christopher S. "Does Judicial Philosophy Matter? A Case Study." West Virginia Law Review 113, no. 287 (Winter 2011). This was a case study of two conservative judges that served on the US Court of Appeals for the Forth Circuit together for over fifteen years. One a textualist, but the other was more an activist or “pragmatist”. The study shows how two similar politically philosophical judges would reach different conclusions. This source will help support the idea that judicial philosophy trumps political philosophy and
…show more content…
Toward Increased Judicial Activism - The Political Role of the Supreme Court. Wesport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1982.

Arthur Miller’s book describes the changes and demands of our judicial system. He not only supports an activist court but encourages o become more active to deal with the many modern complex issues America faces today.

Young, Ernest A. "Judicial Activism and Conservative Politics." Colorado Law Review 73, no. 4 (2002): 1-78.

Ernest Young’s article describes the paradox of being conservative and an activist at the same time. It uses the Rehnquist Court as an example. This article will be useful to explain the terminology and progression of activism to help achieve my thesis.

Ziegler, Mary. "Grass Roots Originalism: Judicial Activism Arguements, The Abortion Debate, and the Politics of Judicial Philosophy." University of Louisville Law Review (University of Louisville) 51, no. 201 (2013).

Ziegler describes the history of the modern popular theory of originalism. The article illustrates the popularization of originalism to be used against modern social issues. The article will be used to direct issues used by critics of judicial activism to legitimize their positions against abortion or gay

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The political landscape as we know it today has always allowed The President of the United States to select his own Supreme Court judge. However, should the Supreme Court Judge’s beliefs represent the traits or value systems of the President of United States? For example, President George Bush appointed both Clarence Thomas and David Souter, two contrasting personalities say the least. Nonetheless, Clarence Thomas was known for his boldness, committed to seeking out the original meaning of the Constitution, perhaps, similarities to President Bush prosecuted the Gulf War and how he stood behind Thomas controversial confirmation hearings (McGinnis, Flaherty, 1995).…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Franke CRJ 410 12/5/2015 Final Paper Justice Clarence Thomas was born in 1948 in Pin Point, Georgia, which was a mainly black area that was founded by freed slaves after the Civil War. He was the second ever black judge, in the Supreme Court and was at first not thrilled to working as a judge. As Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States his views are typically from a conservative stand point, and usually wants a solution that limits the power of the federal government and expands the power of state and the local governments, interestingly enough he has demonstrated a strong support from a stronger executive branch within the government. His father M.C. Thomas was a farm worker while his mother Leola Williams…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book is written to address particularly voters to awaken them up with regard to their powers to elect whoever they like to serve in the judicial systems of the Supreme Court (Sutherland & Dobson, 2005). The book exposes a series of admonishing statements to the public on the series of the on-going struggles with outsmarting judiciary. Sutherland writes to spew out his contempt on what he believes is the abuse of power by the Supreme court Judges and points out ways through which this trend can possibly be mitigated. Both the Supreme Court Judges and the Supreme Court nominees alike are deeply engrossed in corruptive deals which the writer seeks to…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Scorpions: An Analysis

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Over the course of his career, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt appointed a total of seven justices to the United States Supreme Court. Professor of Law at Harvard, and author, Noah Feldman, focuses on the background and evolution of four of FDR’s most influential justice appointees—Felix Frankfurter, Hugo Black, William O. Douglas, and Robert Jackson— throughout his book Scorpions. In the Supreme Court of FDR, and in our modern-day court, one often wonders how justices’ rulings are influenced. Throughout Scorpions, one may see FDR’s justices’ voting behavior demonstrates that a justice’s background, and their friendships, or vendettas against other members on the court, may impact voting behavior. In addition, there may be different degrees…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Grutter v. Bollinger: Achieving Equality Through Inequality? Thesis Statement: To fully understand the Supreme Court’s monumental decision in Grutter v. Bollinger, one must investigate the background political climate, comprehend each side’s position and trace the decision’s current impact. I. Introduction a. Attention getter b. Glue sentences/Introductory information c. Thesis statement II.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Scopes Trial occurred in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925. Although, despite the common idea that the trial was a true incident of unlawfulness, there lies within a controversy that resonates the idea that this trial contained no true legal value, it simply allowed for more tourist dollars and publicity in the small town of Dayton (Singham 23). In all actuality it is exceedingly unclear whether John Thomas Scopes truly taught evolution during his substitute teaching career (26-27). In support of this controversy, proof exists that instead of continuing to jail after his arrest, Scopes spent his time playing tennis and swimming (26). During his time about the town, Scopes was spotted associating civilly with a member of the prosecution team that…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conservative vs. Liberal In the news today, we always hear about how one political side thinks that a law or event should be interpreted in one way, while the other side displays what appears to be a completely contradictory viewpoint. Since the United States became a country, the laws and amendments that the founding fathers wrote in the constitution are very much open to personal interpretation. These two political sides are known as Liberals and Conservatives.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While Marbury never got his deserved commission, the Court’s ruling set a very important precedent for the American judicial system. Without the case, the Supreme Court would have been a lifeless authority with no real power. It also shed very deserved light on the importance of judicial review, in other words, gave the supreme court the power and authority that it needed to have the final say when the situation involves legality. Throughout its long history, when the Court needed to affirm its legitimacy, it has cited Marshall's opinion in Marbury v. Madison. (McBride,…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Samuel Alito Case

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For sixteen years, Alito served as a judge in the U.S. Court of Appeals. It was here that he proved to be difficult to predict in his rulings. “While he was a conservative judge, he approached rulings on a case-by-case basis, rather than perceiving and assigning a farther-reaching ideology to the case at hand with the hope of that ideology extending to cases beyond the present one.” (Chicago-Kent par. 3)…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    13. I observed that even though women groups were concerned about Clarence Thomas ruling against legal abortion during the first few court hearings when Thomas was asked about abortion he didn't even have an opinion on it. 14.I observed that Anita Hill a professor a law professor from the University of Oklahoma accused Clarence Thomas of sexually harassing her when they worked together. 15. I observed after many hearings of the Clarence Thomas, and Anita Hill case in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee the Senate voted Clarence Thomas to be serve as an associate justice for the Supreme Court by a vote of 52-48.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the middle of the eighteenth century, the United States consisted of thirteen colonies ruled by British government. The northern colonies were founded by people who were religious and believed in strong work ethic whereas the southern colonies were Puritans who settled in New England to gain religious freedom from Britain while the first colonists of the southern colonies were Englishmen. The first settlers of the west were Scots-Irish people who settled in deep-soiled Pennsylvania when the English government placed restrictions on their productions of linens and woolens. In 1607, Englishmen of southern colonies started the first permanent settlement of the United States at Jamestown in order to find gold to become wealthy. The first colonists…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In theory, the Supreme Court is meant to be the unbiased force in the United States. However, it has become increasingly apparent that the Supreme Court Justices have a noticeable bias towards their political parties. Unlike Congress, where the political bias from the representatives is expected, the Supreme Court is not meant to have a political leaning. The Constitution states the purpose of the Supreme Court is meant to interpret the Constitution in the most apolitical way possible. However, this is a very recent issue that has developed.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On August 29th 2011, Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg visited the Southern Methodist University Dedman School of Law. During an interview with Dean John B. Attanasio, she discussed her confirmation process and commented on the different milieu's that candidates have faced when nominated for a seat on the Supreme Court. Ginsburg explained that “[Between] 1993 and 1994, the climate was so different from the way it is today... The vote on me was 93 to 3. Today my ACLU connection would most likely disqualify me.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there has been countless ways in which a judge has conducted themselves within a courtroom. Throughout this interval of recreation, there has been only a handful that have ultimately transformed the world we live in today. One of those is known as the Warren Court Era of 1953-1969. Within the courtroom, the Warren Court era has represented a time of trial, struggle, and change, crossing the lines that were once put in front of us to follow. This was a time when judicial philosophy re-defined the way in which we viewed the judicial system as well as a copious outbreak of judicial activism.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dworkin on Judicial Discretion in “Hard Cases” Lu Zhao Boyu (Bozy) | A0127866R In the standard courtroom, one could reasonably expect the judge to be the one responsible for the holding of a case. However, does and should the judge exercise his own discretion when deciding cases? Prominent legal theorist H. L. A. Hart claims that judges do exercise discretion, especially in “hard cases”, where there is no pre-existing or unambiguous rule. To this matter, Hart’s brilliant student Ronald Dworkin offers an alternative theory, which argues that judges do not have discretion and should follow principles instead of rules, even in “hard cases”.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays