Incompatibilism is the theory that we as human beings do not have Free Will. Every little thing that happens in our life is determined by other occurrences in our lives. In response the setting given, someone who is a firm believer would still believe that Free Will does not exist. I believe that might actually strengthen their argument. The fact that in this future setting, scientist have mapped out the entire brain to the point that we can know exactly how you as a person would react to every situation you encounter. This would further prove that from the moment we are born to the exact moment that we die, everything in our life has already been determined. In the eyes of someone who believes in incompatibilism, we will never have free will.
…show more content…
Compatibilsm can be defined as the theory is which free will and determinism can exist together. In the situation given, someone who believes in compatibilism might have a response along the lines of just because our brains are mapped out to show how every thing in our lives is already determined, doesn’t mean that we do not have some say in the matter to do otherwise. Unlike the views of an incompatibilist where they believe that both free will and determinism cannot exits together, a compatibilist understands that both can work together to get result. A compatibilist would think without a doubt that humans would have free will. I can honestly say that I’ve never been more confused in my entire life. Before we even started with the lecture on hard determinism, I believed that without a doubt, we have free will. After learning about hard determinism, I was less sure in my beliefs. After the lesson on compatibilism. I was downright unsure of what I thought. It was safe to say that I didn’t know what I didn’t know. When you asked for the class to vote I voted for compatibilism, it was the closest ideology that fit in with what I believed. If I had to say definitely what I thought it be that our actions are our own, but fate pushes
Compatibilsm can be defined as the theory is which free will and determinism can exist together. In the situation given, someone who believes in compatibilism might have a response along the lines of just because our brains are mapped out to show how every thing in our lives is already determined, doesn’t mean that we do not have some say in the matter to do otherwise. Unlike the views of an incompatibilist where they believe that both free will and determinism cannot exits together, a compatibilist understands that both can work together to get result. A compatibilist would think without a doubt that humans would have free will. I can honestly say that I’ve never been more confused in my entire life. Before we even started with the lecture on hard determinism, I believed that without a doubt, we have free will. After learning about hard determinism, I was less sure in my beliefs. After the lesson on compatibilism. I was downright unsure of what I thought. It was safe to say that I didn’t know what I didn’t know. When you asked for the class to vote I voted for compatibilism, it was the closest ideology that fit in with what I believed. If I had to say definitely what I thought it be that our actions are our own, but fate pushes