The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech In The United States

Improved Essays
Having Free Speech is the basic right that Americans have, it is the ability to speaks one’s mind and ideas. Theres are many benefits to having the ability to project ideas without censorship. Caleb Yong author of “Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?” argues that the liberal justice has a special protection against the restriction of speech and expression, he calls it “Free Speech Principle” where it includes its “sensitivity to the distinction between coverage and protection (Yong)” that the speech should be monitored. Hate speech is too broad to single out the negative effect that it can have in any group. The main concept of this article includes the four categories that hate speech can be set in. The first one is targeted abusive speech, second large number of abusive speech, third organized political exclusivity, and fourth slander against any specific groups. Certain speeches do not fall under the Free Speech Principle which are called “uncovered speech,” when that occurs there has to be a counter part to the speech. It has to have benefit and cost, usually the benefits out weighs the harm in the speech. Freedom of Speech is supported by justification because each speech is given factor in some benefit that over rules …show more content…
I agree with Caleb Yong article on how free speech is important because he explained how lead each person to form the own ideas and opinion and individualize themselves, and although it can lead to hate speeches there is also speeches that benefit for the better. It’s important for people to speak your opinion and ideas without having to have restriction on how important the matter is to you. Every speech has its negative and positive points but it usually the benefits out weigh the negative factor of the speech. I do think that is very important to keep in mind that every action has its

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Free Speech Essay

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Truth is good for us. Furthermore the process of lively debate with opinions from different sides will reinvigorate views that might otherwise be held in an unthinking way”. Mills explains that since we have the privilege to free speech, we all have the right to express our ideas therefore being able to create the most refined idea through all the debate. Mills also states that restrictions on free speech will weaken the progression and will produce invalid results. John Stewart Mills then recites a quote describing how free speech positively affects our society.…

    • 1675 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Oxford Dictionary defines freedom of speech as “The right to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.” In the U.S, the right to free speech is projected under the First Amendment of the American Constitution, with the exception of obscenities, threats, and words that incite law breaking. According to the late associate justice of the supreme court William O. Douglas ““Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us." North American societies to believe that freedom of speech gives you the right to say whatever you want, whenever you want to say it. While this right is crucial to society, it is often abused.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether you’re a writer like Roger Rosenblatt discussing the right of freedom of speech but right place is key, or evaluating the root cause o censorship like writer Bryon Thompson does, we as a society are the ones who make those decisions. The ever changing society has this power. As Irving Kristol would say, the quality of life is where we determine those censorship lines will or will not be crossed. My opinion I am all for free speech, but limits on it are necessary. I think these limits are what makes us a somewhat of a civilized country.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Freedom of speech was one of the first major principles written in the constitution. A common misconception of freedom of speech is that it has no limitations, however, when this speech breeds hatred, questions rise about bans and restrictions. When harm becomes involved, the issue of hate speech is often debated. The harm principle is the only purpose for with it is morally legitimate for government or public opinion to interfere with anyone’s liberty of action (including speech) is to prevent harm to others. Hate speech can lead to direct harm; it is important to restrict it.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the other hand, the constitution of democracy should be better because the balance of justice determines the sense of human rights, as well as decide the destiny of a country. Eventually, negative or positive speech either can take the just cause and courageous voice by citizens that helps the government decides policy for execution in any political and social activity. Banning and censoring offensive speech is unconstitutional, suppressive. The U.S should not censor offensive speech because free speech influences society’s social development. Everybody can use speech to say what they want and that’s help them actually develop socially because they are able to communicate with others more clearly.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ch. 5 Civil Liberties

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Ch.5 Civil Liberties We as the Citizens of the United States are given Civil liberties which are the protections the Constistution provides against the abuse of government power. Many people think of them as a set of principles that grant us the protection of our freedom all the time but that 's not completely correct. Even though our Civil liberties protect our freedom it doesn 't mean that we can do whatever we wish, For example The Smith Act made it a criminal offense to advocate violent overthrow of the government or to organize or be a member of any group or society devoted to such advocacy. Another liberty given to us was the Freedom of speech and press but The Sedition Act made it a crime to write, utter, or publish any false, scandalous…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The reasoning why the “community standard of tolerance” test worked so well was because it allowed for a more broad state of convening people to make a decision, rather than a specific area that may argue that it is way too obscene to have in their neighborhood. This allows for Mills theory to prove that as individuals it is okay for obscene materials to be sold at Butler’s venue and that it is not up to the people to decide whether it is right or wrong for him to be marketing these objects. The Butler case is key, mainly because it set the precedence for how a lot of cases are handled. This precedence works not only in the matter of allowing people’s private lives to be left alone, but also shows how law is starting to change from Devlin’s viewpoint of Harm to…

    • 1544 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although speech is a guaranteed freedom under our Charter, there are vague limits to when this freedom can be restricted by the government. Section 1 of the Charter, commonly referred to as the reasonable limits clause states “The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society”. Unfortunately for us, this word “reasonable” is extremely vague and leaves the decision in the court’s hands as to what is considered a reasonable limit on our freedom. This unclear portion of the Charter creates an issue, because without proper legal counsel, people will be unsure if their speech is deemed reasonable under the law. This may deter any type of controversial speech which could be considered unacceptable under the law because of fear of punishment.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But these forms are imperfect, isolated and not even in proximity of any barbaric behavior. The discovery of liability for defamation required three basic elements to be proven. The first being, that the plaintiff must demonstrate that the charges were actually published. The second being that the defamation was printed and even distributed, it is sufficient that plaintiff can state that one person other than himself is informed about this published material of his defamation. The third and the major one is the material must be false and must be discrediting to the plaintiff in the purview of any reasonable individual.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What he means by this is freedom of speech should limit them mostly by our society which includes who we decide to lead us as a country. Freedom of speech is a great way to let the government know how you are feeling about the government or society. It also lets lem know how you are as a person like being religious, open minded, and etc.Voting is one of the ways to let them know how you feel about recent government changes and to help us pick the correct leader of the free world without any of our politicians input on it. This makes the American people feel like they are important to this country and should be excited to vote. With the college only focusing on the electors votes, it feels like they are ignoring and not respecting the American people’s…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays