The Importance Of Freedom Of Speech In The United States

Improved Essays
Having Free Speech is the basic right that Americans have, it is the ability to speaks one’s mind and ideas. Theres are many benefits to having the ability to project ideas without censorship. Caleb Yong author of “Does Freedom of Speech Include Hate Speech?” argues that the liberal justice has a special protection against the restriction of speech and expression, he calls it “Free Speech Principle” where it includes its “sensitivity to the distinction between coverage and protection (Yong)” that the speech should be monitored. Hate speech is too broad to single out the negative effect that it can have in any group. The main concept of this article includes the four categories that hate speech can be set in. The first one is targeted abusive speech, second large number of abusive speech, third organized political exclusivity, and fourth slander against any specific groups. Certain speeches do not fall under the Free Speech Principle which are called “uncovered speech,” when that occurs there has to be a counter part to the speech. It has to have benefit and cost, usually the benefits out weighs the harm in the speech. Freedom of Speech is supported by justification because each speech is given factor in some benefit that over rules the harm that is caused or can cause. It also has certain limitations on the speech and reasons for the limitations that may violate the rights of the speaker or listener which is known as “non-consequentialist justification.” It is important to be able to evaluate the different diversity of ideas and opinions. It also allows people to be able to interact with each other in discussion and form different opinion based on the facts presented and the beliefs each person abides by. Although speeches can have effect the audience whether it is negative or positive each person is entitle to form there own opinion that they believe is right. Without this basic right “people would not be able to develop intellectually and spiritually, unless they are free to formulate their beliefs and political attitudes through public discussion, and in response to the criticism of others (Barendt 1985, p.14).” In “Predicting the Importance of Freedom of Speech and the Perceived Harm of Hate Speech” by Daniel Downs and Gloria Cowan express how free speech through the context of hate speech discriminate against specific member of a certain groups. With hate speech there is an unfair balance of power, “freedom of speech reinforces inequality with oppressive speech, violating the 14th Amendment of the constitution guarantee of equal protection under the law (Downs and Cowan).” Some example of hate speeches that can lead to negative effects are about race, gender, hate speeches on college campuses and many more. There has been restriction on speeches because of slander, threats against groups or a person, false information that can have a negative effect on the public. There are many reason how hate speech can lead to negative consequences. “In conflict between the harm of hate speech versus freedom of speech is viewed as a moral rather than political conflict (Gilligan’s 1982).” There has also been studies done that show how hate speech differs in gender women tend to be more sensitive than men. Women are more aware of hate speeches because it creates inequality and discriminates against minority groups. Many women are also the main target for those type of speeches. Having the freedom of speech allows for ideas and opinions to be formed, but that does not mean, it does not lead to consequence. There have been many hate crimes against specific groups because of speeches …show more content…
I agree with Caleb Yong article on how free speech is important because he explained how lead each person to form the own ideas and opinion and individualize themselves, and although it can lead to hate speeches there is also speeches that benefit for the better. It’s important for people to speak your opinion and ideas without having to have restriction on how important the matter is to you. Every speech has its negative and positive points but it usually the benefits out weigh the negative factor of the speech. I do think that is very important to keep in mind that every action has its

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Yet, what happens when it harms the people? The dangers of free speech were first defined in the case Brandenberg v. Ohio in 1969, stated that the hate speech of “crime, sabotage, violence or . . . terrorism as a means of accomplishing…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    • 1984- Outside of the Republic National Convention, Gregory Lee Johnson burned an American flag • Johnson was showing his disagreement of president Ronald Reagan’s policies • He was arrested and charged for the desecration of a venerated object • Tried in court • Argued that under the first amendment he is protected for “symbolic speech” • Case was taken to the supreme court where they sided with Johnson • Justice Stevens argued that the symbolic nature of the American flag should outweigh the first amendment’s freedom of speech…

    • 89 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    We all are entitled to freedom of speech but what is it when freedom of speech turns into a hate crime. Begging the question could be used as the logical fallacy with this article. Freedom of Speech is our constitutional right. Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or community to articulate one's opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or sanction. People will continue to express themselves no matter how anyone else feels about the comments.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is important to focus on all three of these factors in order to determine whether free speech is a good thing rather than make judgements about speech only based off the consequences. Citizens have the right to speak freely about anything especially the things that are not common belief. However, anyone who is around the speech has a right to disagree and comment back. Nevertheless, this does not mean that all speech is appropriate or pleasing to all receivers. Many…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most controversial speech that is often protected by the First Amendment is hate speech. Hate speech is "speech that offense, threatens, or insults groups based on race, color, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, disability, or other traits (americanbar.org). " If hate speech insights lawless action or violence, then it is not protected. Otherwise people have the freedom to demean others and use offensive language as they please. Other restrictions to freedom of speech include speech that disturbs the educational environment, promotes lawless action or violence, or infringes on the rights of another individual; these are unprotected speech (Is Freedom of Speech an Absolute…

    • 828 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech is a privilege all Americans share. A person can state whatever they please, so long as it doesn’t cause a clear and present danger, without government interference. The idea that someone can legally think, be, and say whatever they want is what lead millions of immigrants to form the U.S. back in 1776 and is the same reason people fight for their right to live here today. Thanks to information being so accessible in this digital age, individuals are told that they are allowed and to study and form an educated opinion. This comes with one catch.…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Prior Restraint

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Also freedom of speech helps the world to change. Without this kind of expression, the world wouldn’t be aware of all the problems we have, and wouldn’t help to change them. For example, with the Charlie Hebdo problem going around the world and France got aware of the problem of religion, as well as Nelson Mandela. That kind of people broke the limit of speech and it helped to change life…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As Rodney Smolla claimed, “Freedom of Speech is intimately linked to Freedom of thought, to that central capacity to reason and wonder, hope and believe, that largely defines our humanity.” (Smolla 615) Freedom of speech is essential to humanity. It helps us to grow as a…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The definition of hate speech is that it is a type of speech that insults groups of people based on their race. In the constitution, hate speech is any speech, action or attitude, writing, or advertising which is banned because it may encourage violence or discriminatory action against or by a shielded individual or group, or because it belittles or threatens a preserved individual or group. Hate speech comes in all types and forms of intolerance. Free speech covers the right to convey ourselves. Free speech means that the people will have any type of assessment police administrating our private communications.…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Freedom Of Speech

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Another benefit that come with this freedom is people can assemble for peaceful protests. This is true in recent events during which the LGBT community won the right for same gender marriage. They had the freedom to celebrate publicly and express themselves. Along with positive opinions on the freedom of speech there is also another side, the con or against freedom of speech. Freedom of speech can means we are able to say what we like about others, which can sometimes lead to misleading facts being exposed or published on the Internet or media.…

    • 2561 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Have you ever been out in public and heard someone say something rude and ignorant? They have the right to say that because of freedom of speech. When we think of freedom of speech we think of it as we can say what we want without consequences. There are a lot of bad things that you can say with freedom of speech it is truely a gift, that should never be taken away. Freedom of speech is one of the first rights in the USA and it is the first amendment.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In many countries, hate speech has had laws set against it because they believe that it leads to violence, but in the United States it is considered a form of free speech so it is allowed with no limits. As part of the Constitution, freedom of speech is sometimes used so that people are allowed to express their opinions and say as they pleased. Many Americans want to ban hate speech from being a part of the First Amendment because they believe that it causes and provokes violence against others. Others want to defend their rights as citizens and be allowed to express their opinions with each other without being afraid that they might get fined or put in jail because someone didn’t like what they said and got offended. Hate speech should be…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom of speech can be debated on whether or not there should be boundaries to it or not and on what is considered freedom of speech. The First Amendment affirmed that "Congress shall make no law...abridging freedom of speech" but based on www.legal-dictionary.the free dictionary.com it states' All speech is not equal under the First Amendment. The high court has identified five areas of expression that the government may legitimately restrict under certain circumstances. These areas are speech that incites illegal activity and subversive speech, fighting words, obscenity and pornography, commercial speech, and symbolic expression'. On this information and amongst other I believe that freedom of speech is both restricted to a fault and abused.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America, the First Amendment to the Constitution guarantees freedom of speech without exceptions. Therefore, no instance of speech should be considered a crime unless it can be proven beyond any doubt that it will cause suffering, according to opponents. However, there is evidence of psychological harm caused by hate speech; such harm hinders victims’ ability to exert their rights (Harell 410). Truly equal opportunity is thus undermined by hate speech. In addition, there are precedents for circumventing First Amendment laws: Hughes cites four Supreme Court cases in which schools were allowed to restrict the speech of their students (217).…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, people may argue no matter how hateful and disturbing the speech is, they should not have restrictions. Additionally, that those that were target should not take offence. They should just have the ability to ignore the speech. This is not always the case, however, some people really take offence to such words. People should not have fear when it comes to living in the United States, hateful and offensive speech should have some type of restriction.…

    • 514 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays