Introduction
The continuous climate change controversy debated among scientists and professionals could indicate no one really knows beyond theory. There is the side indicating humans continue to cause climate change through actions of pollution and more. There is another side suggesting that the nature and cycle of earth is reason for climate change to happen. The thought of anyone really having the true answer renders all subject to a continued climate change controversy.
The Climate Change Controversy
Anyone operating within the mindset of data accuracy based on provable evidence and scientific research could have a clue to the reality. "The public discussion on climate change has become so polarized that some scientists don't even acknowledge there is a debate" (Herath, 2011, para. 1). The scientists left in the position of denying there is reason for debate leaving humanity to swim in a hope for something dramatic to restore the question to the forefront of reevaluation. The scientists have worked out a picture based on modeled projections rendering assumed patterns to monitor. Some "researchers in Switzerland conclude that it is extremely likely (>95% probability) that at least 74% of the observed warming since 1950 has …show more content…
"Even scientists who think human activity is the main cause of climate change don't deny that natural changes will cause temperature fluctuations on Earth" (Herath, 2011, para. 20). Therefore, everyone once again is wondering how much if any affect has emerged from human activity in nature itself. This continues to perpetuate the motion of a debating drama that might not find resolve anytime soon. Although this controversy almost plagues the community with concerns and viewpoints, some let profiteering off the market roll along to further the chains of indebtedness to drown