Does Britain Deserve The Declaration Of Independence

Decent Essays
The colonies have always been closely connected to Britain. However, with the recent events like high taxation with no representation, I know it is time to seek independence so this unjust treatment ends. We have tried to confront Britain about their unjust treatment to no avail. They seem to hold no value in their connection to the colonies, yet they do not realize our product will still sell without them. So to get the fair treatment we deserve, it is necessary to seek independence from Britain.
Although taxes are a part of living in any country, taxation without representation is unjust. Yet when we try and confront Britain about this, they simply ignore us. As Paine argues in Common Sense, since Britain has not given any inclination towards a compromise we can assume that no terms will be accepted.
…show more content…
Yet, how can they support us if they turn their backs on us when we want to compromise? The only way this can happen is if they have no interest in us as citizens and instead simply see people they can extort for profit.
In contrast what Britain fails to realize is that we can sustain ourselves. As Paine states in Common Sense, “Our corn will fetch its price in any market in Europe, and our imported goods must be paid for, buy them where we will.” This shows that our connection with Britain will only harm us in the future, not helps us.
As a result of poor and unjust taxation without representation and indifference to our attempts to fix this, I know that it is necessary to the continued advancement of the colonies to seek Independence. The colonies deserve fair treatment and taxation with representation. After all, what kind of country ignores its citizen’s pleas and only uses them for their own

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Samuel Seabury and Alexander Hamilton’s exchange debates the logic behind the colonists’ desires to spilt from Great Britain and reveal that Seabury presents a by far more logical argument for the continued relationship between Great Britain and the colonies. Samuel Seabury’s “A View of the Controversy between Great Britain and her Colonies” is a response to Alexander Hamilton’s “A Full Vindication of the Measures of Congress, from the Calumnies of their Enemies.” In fact, the dialogue between Seabury and Hamilton extends even farther back to Seabury’s “Free Thoughts on the Proceedings of the Continental Congress.” All of Hamilton’s and Seabury’s communication centers around the debate of whether the colonies should break from Great Britain. Both Hamilton and Seabury were residents of the colonies, but disagreed greatly, as will be proven throughout this paper, as to whether the colonies should secede.…

    • 1567 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, King George III was unreasonable ,for he knew that he angered the American colonists ,but he did nothing to try ,and fix it after the colonists took a nonviolent way to approach him with their needs. Not only did he tax them ,but he didn’t give the colonists a say in the important decisions ;thus they didn’t have a voice in Parliament. The lack of representation in parliament was one of the main reasons that the colonists rebelled. It was one of the many rights Great Britain took away from the colonists. Therefore, the colonists “raised the issue of taxation without representation.”…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    How Did The Constitution Guard Against Tyranny? We all know the story of how the 13 colonies broke away from the British Monarchy. We know of the wars fought by brave soldiers and the deaths that bloodied the very ground we walk upon. We know of the great leaders that lead us towards the road of freedom, But not many of us know at what great lengths those very leaders took to make this new land different from the british Monarchy.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stamp Act Dbq

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The colonists believed they were entitled to elect a representative from the House of Commons, whereas, the English parliament believed in virtual representation. “Parliament passed the act without debate”, which forced the colonies to pay these…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In several instances, the British were appointed special privileges that the American colonist were not offered. These acts of discrimination are what caused the British and American colonist to inch further and further away from each other. The reasons for this distinction are the British Parliament’s ruling, colonial reimbursement, and English…

    • 1429 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During his time, Thomas Paine wrote and made a copious amounts of valid points when it came to the colonies and England’s government at the time. In his pamphlet, “Common Sense,” Paine argued over many things when it came to the government, but one of his most notable arguments had to have been when he made several points leading to his theories that the colonies should separate from Great Britain. In his argument for independence, he made quite a bit of points, but his three most effective points would have to be that, while Britain protected the colonies during hardships, they only did it to have a gain on their financial standpoint. His second point which is that, any relations with Great Britain cannot exist, because as long as they do…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever wondered why Great Britain’s colonies decided to separate from their mother country? Why did the colonists feel like Great Britain was no longer interested in what’s best for them? When the colonies were first settled in 1607 King James I assured the settlers that they would have all the rights and privileges of a natural British citizen; so what changed? Was it only because they raised taxes, or was there more to it than that? The American colonies felt that the British government was just taking advantage of them, and that they could better govern themselves than any king or parliament thousands of miles away.…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the French and Indian War, the British want American colonies to paid all the war funds, but that is not what we want, right? Colonial people continued to be imposed various exorbitant taxes (Sugar act, stamp act), after the promulgation of those act, colonial people started to protests and demonstrations, protesting against the stamp…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stamp Act Dbq

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    On the other hand, colonist thought that the British were unfair, they hadn't asked them for their consent. The colonist felt that they were blindsided, they were taxed without authorization or representation. The British didn't even bother asking the colonist for a representative on an issue that so greatly affected them. James Otis, a leader in the independence movement in Boston said “taxation without representation is tyranny” because they had no representative in the British Parliament to defend their rights. Colonist thought that the British government was going against their word, “No part of His Majesty’s dominions can be taxed without their consent..…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Did the British have the right to tax the colonist just to raise money to pay for the French Indian War, or did the colonist have a right to fair representation in Parliament? So much has happened since then.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The colonies were being taxed when they did not have any representatives in the Parliament. In William Pitt’s speech to the House of Commons, he says, “It is my opinion, that this kingdom has no right to lay a tax upon the colonies… in every thing except that of taking money out of their pockets without their consent” (document 6). This quote states that it is not right for Parliament to tax the colonies without them having a say in what they are taxed or being able to vote for the people who make the taxes and laws.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This was mainly due to the fact that the English Parliament began imposing taxes on the colonies to help pay for the costs of the war. The colonists weren’t very happy about this either because they believed that they weren’t adequately represented in Parliament. They rallied behind the motto “No Taxation Without Representation”. They thought that since they weren’t represented in Parliament, they shouldn’t be taxed by Parliament. They instead looked to the colonial legislatures like the House of Burgesses for taxes.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Body Paragraph #1: Before the Declaration of Independence, Britain angered many colonists by placing different taxes such as the Stamp Act and Sugar Act. These Acts represented an alarming threat to their cherished liberties and long-established practice of representative government. Body Paragraph #2: After the Declaration of Independence, different arguments by Federalists and Antifederalists raised about the issue of Congress. After this conflict, Federalists provided the Bill of Rights to the Antifederalist, they accepted it and as a result, the constitution was ratified and, shortly after, first 10 amendments were ratified.…

    • 163 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine says that reconciliation would bring “The ruin of the Continent.” This does not mean that Pain wants America and Britain to forever be at war, but he is saying that in order to bring overall peace, America needs to be its own nation in order to thrive on its own and prevent further fighting. This will prevent emigrants from going to their colony of bad governing and constant fighting. One of his reasons is that the British has a monarchy rule with an unfair kind, and America wants to be a democracy. Paine does not think that the king has the right to tell everyone that “[They] shall make no laws but what [he pleases]” He then states that with all of the fighting and tension, it would be nearly impossible to move forward and the two colonies would eventually just…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The British empire had to increase revenue in order to recover from the enormous debt it had accumulated and it also had to gain control over a recently doubled in size Empire. The answer to these problems came in the form of a series of taxes and acts on the colonists. However with every act or a newly imposed tax without representation, the colonist began to put their own differences aside in order to unite against a common enemy in the British. Most of the colonists had come to the west with the promise of self governance and having some separation from the Empire, however due to the social and economic constrains placed on them after the war, the colonists were left with no choice but to fight for their independence by means of the American Revolution, leaving England’s attempts at greater control…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays