The matter was prominent over a decade ago when the documentary was released and since then has only continued to increase. Many have questioned the honourability of Moore in producing the documentary, with accusations that he was capitalising on terrorism by taking advantage of the household name which Columbine possesses. It is apparent that the brutality of gun violence has been downplayed by portraying the exposition in a cynical, sarcastic tone in order to position the audience in favour of the filmmaker. Regardless of the marginal contribution the film has made in the endeavour to reduce gun violence, it remains incontestable that ‘Bowling for Columbine’ aligns with the conception that no text is
The matter was prominent over a decade ago when the documentary was released and since then has only continued to increase. Many have questioned the honourability of Moore in producing the documentary, with accusations that he was capitalising on terrorism by taking advantage of the household name which Columbine possesses. It is apparent that the brutality of gun violence has been downplayed by portraying the exposition in a cynical, sarcastic tone in order to position the audience in favour of the filmmaker. Regardless of the marginal contribution the film has made in the endeavour to reduce gun violence, it remains incontestable that ‘Bowling for Columbine’ aligns with the conception that no text is