Type 2
1. Do you think CAPO is useful for avoiding brutality? Why?
Yes, anyone had been investigated by CAPO means the guys had little chance to be promoted in the future. But CAPO generally gives verbal warning instead of punishing colleagues 2. Do you think IPCC is useful to avoid brutality of police? Why?
Ignored it. It is useless as it has no power.
Type 3
1. Do you think a more independent institution is more useful to investigate misconduct of police?
Sure, it is more useful. But I will not support. It gives me more pressure.
2. Do you think clearly define responsibility of misusing force is useful to avoid misconduct of police?
Yes, colleagues will be more careful when they know the possible legal responsibility.
Type 4
1. Have …show more content…
Do you think CAPO is useful for avoiding brutality? Why?
It is useful. If anyone being complained and finally CAPO accept the complaint. The concerned officer will be in trouble. Though CAPO finally proved the officer is not guilty, his/her possibility of promotion will still be affected.
2. Do you think IPCC is useful to avoid brutality of police? Why?
No, CAPO is the only actor determines colleagues are guilty or not.
Type 3
1. Do you think a more independent institution is more useful to investigate misconduct of police?
Yes, as a more independent institution to handle investigation is fairer. As CAPO is still an internal department. Its judgment will be easily intervened by senior officials. Also, some commanders have good relationship with personnel of CAPO which also affects the fairness of CAPO. 2. Do you think clearly define responsibility of misusing force is useful to avoid misconduct of police?
Yes, everyone knows the cost if misusing force and we need to be more careful before making decision.
Type 4
1. Have you ever experienced any brutality of force in your career?
No, I haven’t used my power to bully suspects. But I have witnessed some colleagues do that on gangsters.
Follow-up question: Have you ever verbally blame on
1. Do you think CAPO is useful for avoiding brutality? Why?
Yes, anyone had been investigated by CAPO means the guys had little chance to be promoted in the future. But CAPO generally gives verbal warning instead of punishing colleagues 2. Do you think IPCC is useful to avoid brutality of police? Why?
Ignored it. It is useless as it has no power.
Type 3
1. Do you think a more independent institution is more useful to investigate misconduct of police?
Sure, it is more useful. But I will not support. It gives me more pressure.
2. Do you think clearly define responsibility of misusing force is useful to avoid misconduct of police?
Yes, colleagues will be more careful when they know the possible legal responsibility.
Type 4
1. Have …show more content…
Do you think CAPO is useful for avoiding brutality? Why?
It is useful. If anyone being complained and finally CAPO accept the complaint. The concerned officer will be in trouble. Though CAPO finally proved the officer is not guilty, his/her possibility of promotion will still be affected.
2. Do you think IPCC is useful to avoid brutality of police? Why?
No, CAPO is the only actor determines colleagues are guilty or not.
Type 3
1. Do you think a more independent institution is more useful to investigate misconduct of police?
Yes, as a more independent institution to handle investigation is fairer. As CAPO is still an internal department. Its judgment will be easily intervened by senior officials. Also, some commanders have good relationship with personnel of CAPO which also affects the fairness of CAPO. 2. Do you think clearly define responsibility of misusing force is useful to avoid misconduct of police?
Yes, everyone knows the cost if misusing force and we need to be more careful before making decision.
Type 4
1. Have you ever experienced any brutality of force in your career?
No, I haven’t used my power to bully suspects. But I have witnessed some colleagues do that on gangsters.
Follow-up question: Have you ever verbally blame on