Do Theories Make Sense Of Facts

Improved Essays
I believe that this statement is 100 percent true because without the use of facts nothing can be proven, however theories can help us create facts. With the development of theories there is a basic necessity for proof. The only way to prove a theory is with experimentation, which will lead to be factual information once experimented on.

Of course there are some exceptions like in religion there are plenty of theories and none are based off of factual evidence. When it comes to Heaven and Hell and Jesus and God there are many different perspectives of the story. Different perspectives can be considered theories. The idea of perspective plays such a big role that people begin to believe that all theories that they support are factual. However since the early 1900s some very coveted scientists believe that the order is first come theories then come facts. According to author Douglas J. Futuyma, science consists of forming hypotheses (theories) by intuition, observation and other types of insight.

To what extent can theories mislead the interpretation of facts? Theories can mislead our perception of facts in such ways until we are looking and believing that there is another aspect of the fact when there really is not. A perfect example
…show more content…
Theories can be like a framework which shapes our perception. Theories can help researchers derive links between solid facts and facts that are not 100% proven. Theories can provide researchers with a brand new array of questions and can simultaneously change the perception, and the way we view and collect data. Theories also can involve emotion, this is because since theories are not based upon facts. Personal feelings and aspirations can be involved in the creation of a theory. Theories can help broaden a perspective, help people see things that were not there before. They can also help people go more in depth in thought and analysis because there is no need for factual

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Macroevolution Dbq

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages

    7 years ago, a friend and I were in a science class, when the teacher asked us how old the earth was. Replying with the truth, I answered “6 to 7 thousand years”. When the teacher told me I was wrong, I was confused. And when I debated his answer of 12 billion or so years, I was scolded.…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In William James', “The Will to Believe, James provides a defensive response to religious faith regarding W. T. Clifford's position in his essay, "The Ethics of Belief" (James, 2001). Within his stance, James suggests that his views have a somewhat broader scope that Clifford’s (Princeton University, n.d.). Moreover, that in certain cases, it is not only permissible but inevitable that a person’s passional, non-rational nature will determine that person’s belief (Princeton University, n.d.). In summary, James presents that anything that is proposed for our belief is a hypothesis and that any question about which of the two hypotheses to accept is a person’s option (Princeton University, n.d.).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For the RWJ-IOM recommendations to occur, one must not fail to remember the importance of theory development and evidence based practice. A theory is a method we use to give us understanding. It provides concepts to name what we observe and to explain relationships between concepts. Theory allows us to explain what we see and to figure out how to bring about change. It is a tool that enables us to identify a problem and to plan a means for altering the situation.…

    • 172 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is indication that belief does not have to be verifiable. There are some ideas that religion may not be accurate, however that is how someone applies their faith into practice. It is believed that belief depends on the specific individual. For example, belief can be applied through personal experience of how God has been faithful in their life or others’ life. In the article, “The Lost Legacy of Anselm's Argument: Re-Thinking the Purpose of Proofs for the Existence of God” explains about how many philosophers of religion, have confirm the existence of God and also have not confirmed the existence of God.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Theory and the biopsychosocial-spiritual framework are vital components in social work practice. By having an understanding of these two aspects, social workers ensure that they are taking appropriate actions while considering the entire context of a client’s situation and needs. This is particularly applicable when working with older adults, who benefit greatly from a holistic approach towards what is a unique and often misunderstood stage of life.…

    • 1056 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories can be a set of rational type of “out of the box” ideas or general thinking. They can be brushed off as a mad man’s belief or an educated man’s perspective. Moynihan’s report and ideas were unsubstantiated and not proven until his “solutions” were put into place. Would it solve all problems or affect every household or individual the same? No, but theories cannot be proven or unproven until the facts of what credits or discredits a theory are challenged.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is hard to change one’s mind after they have set it to believe a certain way. Humans’ disregard of facts for information that confirms their original beliefs shows the flaws in human reasoning. The desire that humans have to always be right is supported by confirmation bias. As long as false information is in the world humans will continue to use it to validate their…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Good God And Evil Essay

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages

    INTRODUCT ION The question of the existence of a good God and evil is by far the most important problem for philosophical, religious, and moral consideration. These two contradicting arguments have been postulated by many philosophers like Richard Dawkins, William Rowe…etc. Though the intrinsic presence of suffering is the most obvious feature that determines the character of the existence or non-existence of God, it is an empirical fact, and the truth or falsity of these facts can only be established by observations and experiments relating to the real world. It would seem that the best arguments against the nonexistence of God is based on the logical argument of evil in the world and the attributes of an all- powerful, all knowing and all good God.…

    • 2059 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are 3 different types of knowledge: acquaintance knowledge (I know Auckland well), skillful knowledge (I know how to ride a bike), and propositional knowledge (I know that snakes are reptiles). The first two forms of knowledge are interesting, but we are only concerned with the third, what it is to know some proposition, ‘p’. We automatically note a difference between belief and knowledge. Individuals can believe propositions that are not true; but if you know that ‘p’, then ‘p’ must be true. You cannot know something incorrect; if it is incorrect, then you do not know it.…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There is no doubt that not all evidence is reliable. There are many factors that make evidence unreliable, for instance, personal experiences are difficult to trust because they are formed by ones person opinion of how they see the world. Personal observations are also unreliable because everyone sees one thing in different ways. There is bias in authority figures arguments. Even surveys are unreliable because people do not truthfully answer survey questions.…

    • 100 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Falsificationism Karl Popper asserts that the scientific status of a theory is derived from that theories potential for refutation. Theories outlining experimental results that (if observed) could refute the theory are classified as scientific. Theories that lack this content are classified as pseudoscience. Popper uses this distinction to preface his scientific view: falsificationism.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It’s no question that any good scientific theory must adequately explain and predict an observation, however, there is much controversy regarding the attitudes taken towards these theories (DeWitt 71). There are two types of people in the world: realists and instrumentalists, or anti-realists. Realits believe that in order for a theory to be acceptable, it must also “reflect the way things really are,” which is clearly the intuitive way to go (DeWitt 73). The sole aim for realists is to give a true picture of the world, whereas instrumentalists’ think the real goal is for a theory to have empirical adequacy (Okasha 55). For the anti-realist, the matter of whether or not a theory is true is irrelevant if it accurately predicts or describes a…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A theory is like an idea or prediction a person has, but has little to no evidence to prove his or her theory. When a scientist wants to prove their theory he or she will design an experiment. Three main ways of collecting data for an experiment are natural observation, case studies, and surveys. The first research method is natural observation. Natural Observation is when the researcher will watch his or her test subjects without interacting with them or letting them know they are test subjects.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Once a hypothesis is proven to be plausible numerous times, than it turns into what is known as a theory. In science something can be proven to be false but nothing can be proven to be 100 percent…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    This is particularly important in concepts that involve past events, which cannot be tested. Take, for example, the Big Bang Theory or the Theory of Biological Evolution as it pertains to the past; both are theories that explain all of the facts so far gathered from the past, but cannot be verified as absolute truth, since we cannot go back to test them. More and more data will be gathered on each to either support or disprove them. The key force for change in a theory is, of course, the scientific method. A scientific law, said Karl Popper, the famous 20th century philosopher, is one that can be proved wrong, like “the sun always rises in the east.”…

    • 6226 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Great Essays