The straight forward objectives for DNA, alongside, the rational elements made everyone fully aware of what could be done, how to utilize, lastly find cures by one’s genetics, which was ultimately determined by the structure and identification of a person’s DNA. For example, learning that diseases run in families is only conceivable because of DNA. Otherwise, doctors and scientists likely would still be on a chase trying to alter a scientific way in finding out how to tell one person from another. Questions, like “are these two people related?”, and “does this family carry genetic diseases?” were two inquiries of many being wondered upon before the discovery of the double helix, and isolation of the discovery. In the article chosen to write this essay, speaks of how deoxyribonucleic acid was discovered and how it had been structured in a double helix. Moreover, in best comprehending the presuppositions, personalities and social circumstances, DNA is thought to be a godsend in finding clues in mastering the art of solving mysteries.
The additional considerations that may not fit nearly into presuppositions, personalities, and social circumstances are defined by many aspects. An essential presupposition of DNA is that many others are absolutely convinced that a paternity test is always accurate. Matter of fact, no test will be one hundred percent correct. However, in comparison …show more content…
In high school, I learned about DNA, so most of the details within the article did not present new knowledge. I am an enormous fan of most medical shows, which also allowed me to learn more about DNA at a younger age. The other day, I watched a documentary about medical mysteries. A small boy living in Thailand, at the time had a rare disease condition that had not been yet discovered, and therefore, did not have a name. The various professionals were not able to figure out what was causing his rare illness. Moving onward, he passed away due to not being able to be cured. I am using this story as an example for my essay because it somehow altered the nature and function of science just a little. This new acknowledge information changed the way I viewed the men and women who had realized how DNA works, the functions and nature of the scientific method, as well as science in general. In addition, scientists have offered information about DNA, but there is a long journey to develop that understanding. James Watson and Francis Crick, as stated earlier, are the two professionals with being associated in determining the structure of DNA in year