From infamous Disney princess to love at first sight, love is always is in the air. Then comes a time where the two lovebirds fall apart and file for a Divorce. Divorce is decimating our way for loving one another. Divorce should not be allowed because of the effects it has on children, the environment and the community. According to The National Vital Statistics System the Divorce rate in 2014 is 3.2 per 1,000 populations (45 reporting States and D.C.).
This topic is exceptionally important because I, like (refer to stat), am a child of a divorce parents. Divorce has everlasting effects on everyone, including the child of the divorce parents. No matter what the age, Divorce leaves a mark on the child that will never go away. It could also …show more content…
Kant is an anti-consequentialist, which means he believes there is no moral certainty. Kant also believes in good-will which is basically following your duty. Kant’s theory on Universal Maximus supports my position on Divorce. Universalizable Maxims is logically applicable to all people at all times which is his General Rule. He has no exceptions to this rule. Kant wants us to act in accordance with your duty thus following your own rules. Immanuel says that “only act on those maxims that you can will to become universal law”. Meaning that treat others the way you want to be treated. This goes with my views on divorce because parents should rethink on divorcing because it could start a slippery slope by passing divorce to the next generation. Divorce could be avoided if people did not use other people as a means to an end. Kant also says “Always treat people as ends-in-themselves, never as means to an end”. This is the basis of practical imperative. This means that always treat people the same way they want to be treated, as an equal. This goes with my views on divorce because treating your spouse or loved one as an equal and worked as a team to solve your differences could and in fact avoid Divorce. Marriage is a vow that should not be broken because of the significant other taking advantage of the other; it should always be a team …show more content…
The partner that is lured by external disturbances to cheat and lead to an divorce. We shape our own destiny, so why not control who is in your life? We live in a world where we decided that when we do not want something in our life, we cut it off. We cut things off without realizing the effects it has on people around us. Unfortunately, the children are affected deeply by divorce and feel starstrucked at the fact that their parents hate each other. Children are not even a choice on if their parents should even divorce. At a young age, the child starts to think that they are the reason their parents divorced. As the child grows up, the child will start to think more logically and critically upon the situation. Divorce is one of things we frown upon especially cut off, in a heartbeat. The Divorce rates throughout the past 10 years have skyrocketed and will continue to skyrocket. In the Introduction to Epictetus, Epictetus says that “accepting one’s fate and the fate of the coming directly from the divine intelligence which makes the best that is possible”. This means that understanding one’s destiny and the destiny come right from the divine intelligence. My question to Epictetus is if the understanding of one’s destiny is made from the “divine intelligence”, why do kids who suffer from a divorce become troubled and have behavioral issues? How could a virtuous man sit back and let
This topic is exceptionally important because I, like (refer to stat), am a child of a divorce parents. Divorce has everlasting effects on everyone, including the child of the divorce parents. No matter what the age, Divorce leaves a mark on the child that will never go away. It could also …show more content…
Kant is an anti-consequentialist, which means he believes there is no moral certainty. Kant also believes in good-will which is basically following your duty. Kant’s theory on Universal Maximus supports my position on Divorce. Universalizable Maxims is logically applicable to all people at all times which is his General Rule. He has no exceptions to this rule. Kant wants us to act in accordance with your duty thus following your own rules. Immanuel says that “only act on those maxims that you can will to become universal law”. Meaning that treat others the way you want to be treated. This goes with my views on divorce because parents should rethink on divorcing because it could start a slippery slope by passing divorce to the next generation. Divorce could be avoided if people did not use other people as a means to an end. Kant also says “Always treat people as ends-in-themselves, never as means to an end”. This is the basis of practical imperative. This means that always treat people the same way they want to be treated, as an equal. This goes with my views on divorce because treating your spouse or loved one as an equal and worked as a team to solve your differences could and in fact avoid Divorce. Marriage is a vow that should not be broken because of the significant other taking advantage of the other; it should always be a team …show more content…
The partner that is lured by external disturbances to cheat and lead to an divorce. We shape our own destiny, so why not control who is in your life? We live in a world where we decided that when we do not want something in our life, we cut it off. We cut things off without realizing the effects it has on people around us. Unfortunately, the children are affected deeply by divorce and feel starstrucked at the fact that their parents hate each other. Children are not even a choice on if their parents should even divorce. At a young age, the child starts to think that they are the reason their parents divorced. As the child grows up, the child will start to think more logically and critically upon the situation. Divorce is one of things we frown upon especially cut off, in a heartbeat. The Divorce rates throughout the past 10 years have skyrocketed and will continue to skyrocket. In the Introduction to Epictetus, Epictetus says that “accepting one’s fate and the fate of the coming directly from the divine intelligence which makes the best that is possible”. This means that understanding one’s destiny and the destiny come right from the divine intelligence. My question to Epictetus is if the understanding of one’s destiny is made from the “divine intelligence”, why do kids who suffer from a divorce become troubled and have behavioral issues? How could a virtuous man sit back and let