In the reading, Pojman analysis two theses, first the Diversity Thesis discussed the impossibilities to have a universally valid moral principle, considering that morally right and wrong varies from society to society. The Dependency Thesis then discussed that what is right or wrong is validated from the society, meaning, a person’s opinion of right and wrong would be entirely depends on one’s cultural acceptance. Pojman pointed out it is not impossible for societies to share a common, single moral principle, and that both theses seem to be established in their argument based on social acceptances. While the given reasons may be different, but both thesis share the same principle, which both agreed with relativism, that there is a fundamental
