Diversity Experience: Same Sex Marriages

Improved Essays
Diversity Experience
June 2015, the United States Supreme Court made same-sex marriages legal in all 50 states. People across the Nation are divided on this issue. I found myself feeling indifferent on the Supreme Court’s decision. I know I would never want to marry a person of the same sex, so the decision by the Supreme Court had no effect on me personally. Some religions are against same-sex marriages, and consider homosexuality as a sin and immoral. I grew up as a Southern-Baptist, and I too looked upon homosexuality as deviant behavior. Over time, my view has changed. I disagree on suppressing a person’s rights because of their sexual orientation.
Having the opportunity to travel and seeing different cultures, I have come to believe that people have the right to be happy. If I were not afforded this opportunity, my view would most likely remained the same. Sometimes I find myself conflicted between what society says is okay and my core beliefs. Even if society things certain things are acceptable, my core beliefs will never change. I do not consider myself homophobic, but in the past, my actions and statements were heterosexism. I personally do not identify with the LGBT lifestyle, and I do not condone hatred and maltreatment to those who do.
For me to gain a better
…show more content…
Each attribute possibly at the other end of the spectrum compared to the majority of the audience I will be a part of during the event. Having understood my positionality and aware of my bias of not fully understanding how someone could have intimate feelings for the opposite sex, prepared me to not questioning how each individual entering the room might identify. In preparation of my experience, as a researcher, I must echo the voice of the LGBT population that I observed when

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell v. Hodges Summary and Analysis This 2015 landmark Supreme Court case questions the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans and is the consolidation of six federal cases from the Fourth Circuit. In district court, judges found in favor of the same-sex couples. However, the Fourth Circuit court reversed these rulings and found same-sex marriage bans constitutional under the doctrine of stare decisis with regards to the 1971 landmark case Baker v. Nelson, wherein the Supreme Court implicitly endorsed the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans by dismissing the case (different from not issuing certiorari), tacitly upholding the Minnesota Supreme Court’s rationale that the constitutionality of same-sex marriage bans is a political question.…

    • 599 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs. Hodges case legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states. I know this is a very sensitive subject, but I do not believe in same sex marriage, I think it is wrong and unbiblical. It was ruled unconstitutional to deny a marriage license because of the Due Process clause and the Equal protection clause. Even though this can be applied, it shouldn’t be because the original definition of marriage wasn’t between two individuals of the same gender.…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For these couples, their natural rights were being revoked and “thrown away.” Riot after riot changes sadly weren’t being made and same-sex couples were still being discriminated against. However after further investigation, the supreme was able to see that this negligence was a direct violation of the constitution. After June 26, 2015 the Supreme Court ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. This day is a true testament to the ideas and concepts created by the enlightenment thinkers.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Civil Rights

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1967, (while many states tried to outlaw interracial marriage), the Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court case stated that these laws (outlawing interracial marriage) were unconstitutional. An interracial couple was ordained in a state that allowed interracial marriage, but when they moved to Virginia (a state that did not allow interracial marriage), the couple was charged with disobeying Virginia Law. Finally, the courts declared the bans unconstitutional and stated that marriage was a basic civil right of man, and it was essential to our…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Loving Vs Virginia

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Virginia case. Obergefell V. Hodges was another case involving the law restricting marriage. Instead of race, however, it was sexual orientation. The Supreme Court decision ruled in favor of gay marriage and made it legal in all fifty states, but there was not the same unanimous decision of the justices as in Loving V. Virginia.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Kim Davis

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the United States of America, our people have come a long way since our nation’s founding. Nevertheless, we have slowly but surely fought to get to where we are today. After years of civil rights’ movements and desegregation laws, our government has now legalized same-sex marriage. While a majority of the nation rejoices that all people can now have equal rights when it comes to this life decision, many are opposed to the new legislation. One citizen who has refused to acknowledge this change in law is Kim Davis, a Kentucky clerk who has refused to issue marriage licenses to any same-sex couples.…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kim Davis A Villain

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kim Davis: Hero or Villain? When the Supreme Court decided to recognize the various marriages of same-sex couples nationwide on June 26, 2015, not everyone was applauding the significant event. While thousands of people across America flooded the streets with joy there were still those who believed allowing such marriages was against “God’s law,” and of those people was Kim Davis. Davis, a county clerk in Rowan, Kentucky, decided to “uphold “God’s law” by denying same-sex couples (and now all couples) marriage licenses.…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26th 2015, the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of marriage equality for the LGBT community, sparking both a huge change in how LGBT relationships are viewed, and an enormous controversy debating the morality of equality (Obergefell et al. v. Hodges, Director, Ohio Department of Health, et al., 2015). The phrase "morality of equality" is used in this instance because while all this judgment did was give LGBT people the right to marry any legally consenting adult, there are people who feel this equality is still somehow immoral. This feeling of immorality in relation to marriage equality is generally related to religious beliefs, and should have nothing to do with the legality of the situation. The Obergefell vs. Hodges case was monumental for the LGBT community.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 26, 2015, LBGT+ activist groups rejoiced as the United States Supreme Court ruled in favor of legalizing same-sex marriage believing that a ban of it violated the 14th amendment of the Constitution. This didn’t help stop any hatred of same-sex couples and it seemed that the world would implode due to the court’s decision However, backlash soon followed, leading to an Appeals court, saying it didn’t violate the 14th amendment and many “Christian” groups saying the ruling by the Supreme Court goes against the bible. In the case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, the ruling has influenced the United States to take steps in a more progressive future where everyone has equal rights and helping America begin its transition into a more positive light with supporting this decision. Much of the backlash from this decision was due to these different “Christian” activist groups who said that same-sex marriage went against their religious liberties and violated the bible in Leviticus. Which is quite hilarious as none of them probably adhere to the teaching in the book of Leviticus like no eating shellfish and no mixing different materials to wear like a cotton, polyester blend…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On Friday, June 26 2015 the Supreme Court ruled in favor of marriage equality in all fifty states. The five to four decision would forever change the lives of members in the lesbian, gay, transgender community and the rest of the country. The circumstances in which this ruling came about was tragic, the concerns around the case caused a lot of controversy but clearly the right decision was made. I really don’t understand why people don’t get this. I realize that it may be difficult for some to expand their traditional views on relationships and marriage, but we as a society need to accept the fact that others have qualities that make them slightly different yet we are all the same.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    People Are Born Gay Essay

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the past decade views on homosexuality have changed dramatically. Starting with Vermont in early 2000, being the first state to legalize civil unions between two men or two women. More recently, since 2008, more than 43 efforts to help homosexuals receive the same rights as heterosexuals have been made. Just a few months ago, in June, the Supreme Court ruled that same-sex couples have…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Homosexuality Gay Marriage

    • 1284 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In June 2015, the supreme court ruled five to four in favor of allowing gay marriage in all fifty states. They believed it to be unconstitutional to not allow gay couples to marry. Before the Supreme Court ruled 12 states still held strong in their positions to ban or sustained from condoning same-sex marriage (State-by-State,…

    • 1284 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom Of Religion

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Essential Right For All People Of All Religions “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”- The First Amendment To U.S Constitution. One of the first thing that was mentioned in the First Amendment to U.S Constitution is freedom of religion. Freedom of religion was established in 1791 and has made a big impact on many lives. Freedom of religion not only gives each person the right to practice their own beliefs but also prohibits the government from showing favor toward one specific religion, and binds all different individuals together as an united nation.…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays