District Of Columbia V. Heller Case Summary

Decent Essays
In this picture I am exercising the right to carry a weapon.

Case: District of Columbia v. Heller(2008)
In this case the District of columbia was fighting against Heller to ban individuals who aren't part of the military to posses a firearm at home even if the weapon is registered. Heller who was a special police man applied to register a firearm he wanted to keep at home but the District of Columbia refused. Heller disagreed with the government so he filed this suit and it went to the supreme court, this was a very close case. The winner won by a 5-4 decision to the supreme court.
Heller won the case at the supreme court in 2008 with a 5-4 decision. The supreme court decided that people have the right to posses a firearm because the second

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Facts and Procedural History: Once the individual, Graham, realized the commencement of a low insulin is being reacted, he had the inclination to purchase an orange juice to thwart the low insulin reaction. Upon arriving the convenience store where he spotted a line of customers waiting for their turn at the checkout line. Graham rushed out of the store without paying for the content. An officer spotted the swift activity and decided to do an investigative stop and called for backup.…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Massachusetts, the Court found three inconsistencies regarding the Supreme Court of Massachusetts’ ruling prohibiting the private possession of stun guns and the Court’s past rulings and precedents. The Court found that (1) the [ Massachusetts Supreme Court] explained that stun guns are not protected because they “were not in common use at the time of the Second Amendment’s enactment.” . . . This is inconsistent with Heller’s clear statement that the Second Amendment “extends . . . to . . . arms . . .…

    • 2225 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The McCulloch v Maryland case, presided over by John Marshall, dealt with the legality of the State of Maryland’s decision to place taxes on bank notes chartered from outside of the area. The issue was brought to the national level after James McCulloch, leader of the Second National Bank of the United States within Baltimore, refused to pay the imposed fee. The Supreme Court ultimately sided in his favor, citing the fact that the state had ratified the Constitution and then, the Necessary and Proper Clause. Likewise, Congress possesses powers that are not specifically defined within the supreme law of the land, therefore it is up to the discretion of the Judicial Branch to decide whether or not the intent is reasonable. In this case, they…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Abramski v the United States is a case that questioned the legality of a lawful gun-purchaser buying a gun for another lawful gun-owner who resides in a different state and inaccurately listing that they are the actual buyer. Due to the Supremacy clause (86), it was up to the Supreme Court to make the final decision by looking further into the Gun Control Act of 1968, which was established to try and stop felons from obtaining a gun, and determining exactly what it prohibits. In 2009, Bruce Abramski bought a gun for his uncle, Angel Alvarez, because after his years of service as a police officer, he was eligible for a discount at a local Virginia gun store. Before he purchased the weapon, three federally-licensed gun dealers told Abramski to…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mcculloch V. Maryland

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages

    One of the most intellectual forces of the Marshall Court was its importance on the Supreme Court's power in Marbury v. Madison. Preceding to the Marshall Court, organizers of the Constitution, For example, Alexander Hamilton inquired the Supreme Court part as the lowest part of the major branch of government. The Marshall Court changed this knowledge in Marbury v. Madison. The case's crucial issue was whether the court had the power to support a constitutional check on the case.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The defendant in the case that was with Heller, whose last name is Stevens, stated his opinion on the matter. Stevens stated that, “The Second Amendment was adopted to protect the right of the people to maintain a well-regulated militia. It was a response to the concern that the power of congress to disarm the state militias and create a national standing army posed an intolerable threat to state sovereignty (Lawnix, par. 15).” Neither in the manuscript of the Second Amendment or in the quarrels in the advocate’s evidence, was there even the least interest of the Framers in limiting of the legislature’s power of controlling the uses of firearms used by the private citizen. Stevens also said, “There is no indication that the Framers intended…

    • 203 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kennedy vs Louisiana (2007) was a case about a guy name Patrick Kennedy and is charged with aggravated rape of his eight year old stepdaughter. The eight year old child suffered serious injuries from Mr. Kennedy. Under the Louisiana Law, the prosecutor is allowed to seek the death penalty against defendants who are found guilty of raping children under the age of twelve. The jury granted the prosecutor the death penalty in which he sought. The difference between the Coker vs Georgia case and the Kennedy vs. Louisiana case is that a child is involved.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2008, after the Court had decided Heller and said that the Second Amendment includes an individual right to keep and bear arms, Otis McDonald and other Chicago residents sued the city for violating the Constitution. They claimed that Chicago’s handgun regulations violate their 14th Amendment rights. Specifically, the residents argue that the 14th Amendment makes the Second Amendment right “to keep and bear Arms” applicable to state and local governments. The federal district court ruled for Chicago and McDonald appealed. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals decided for Chicago, as well.…

    • 586 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Opinion of the Court: McCullen v. Coakley The Eleanor McCullen against Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts was a Supreme Court Issue in 2013. In 2000 Massachusetts Legislature created the Massachusetts Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act which stated that a buffer zone will be enforced around abortion clinics to prevent interference between those who are pro-life and pro-choice advocates. The final ruling from the Supreme Court was that the buffer zones did violate the First Amendment.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Personal Jurisdiction is established when a manufacture that is a non-resident of the forum state has sufficient minimum contacts with the forum state in which the manufacturer purposefully avails itself, that maintenance does not offend “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.” Intl. Shoe v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945), Minimum contacts requires the Respondent to have “purposefully availailed itself of the privilege of conducting activities within the forum State.” Hanson v. Denckla, 357 U.S. 235, 253 (1958). Purposeful availment arise when a manufacturer introduces goods into the stream of commerce according to World-Wide Volkswagen.…

    • 1286 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heller. In this case, the problem was that after the District of Columbia passed legislation including the registration of handguns, requiring licenses for pistols, and stating that all legal firearms must be kept unloaded and the trigger locked, a group people said that it took away their Second Amendment right. The people that disagreed with them were private gun owners. The federal trial court said that the Second Amendment only applied to militias and not private gun owners. I think that everyone should be allowed to have firearms because they are good for…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Case Summary

    • 2344 Words
    • 10 Pages

    out any of the modern guns as well as the guns that were around when the constitution was made. Another important court case is United States V. Masciandaro. This case is important to the Second Amendment. The case is about carrying a concealed weapon in plain view, a young man and his girlfriend where visiting a state park in Virginia. One of the park police officers noticed that their truck was not parked correctly in between the lines and got out of his vehicle to examine Masciandaro’s truck and when he did he noticed the gun, and called for backup (Halbrook).…

    • 2344 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The First amendment was passed by congress on September 25, 1789 and ratified on December 15, 1791. This amendment forbids congress from interfering with a citizen’s freedom of religion, speech, assembly and petition. The right to petition is important to the United States because without it angering citizens, freedom of speech protects everyone from being able to express themselves freely. Freedom of press is meant to publish and distribute speech.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heller, McDonald Vs. Chicago, and Peruta Vs. County of San Diego. In the court case of the District of Columbia Vs. Heller there was a 5-4 vote that changed the District of Columbia Law that prohibited citizens to carry handguns.…

    • 942 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control and the Second Amendment According to Schulman (1991), the text of the Second Amendment of the US Constitutions reads as follows: “a correctly structured militia, for purposes of state security; the right of the citizens to have and to carry arms shall not be challenged.” This is a paraphrased version of what is contained in the original constitutional document. Nonetheless, it captures the spirit of the constitution regarding the issue of guns and their possession thereof.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays