Distributive Justice Nozick Analysis

Improved Essays
Nozick’s first premise is that the patterned principles of distributive justice involve taking away success from the actions of others. Nozick gives examples as to how this would be done; he concludes that through the process of distributive justice many people will benefit from the success of others. The next premise for this argument says that by acquiring wealth from someone else’s labor is equivalent to seizing hours of their time. This means that the principles of distributive justice direct people to work harder and longer so that others may benefit. This means that distributive justice takes more from those who have achieved success and redistributes their success to someone who didn’t earn it. Equally redistributing wealth applies that

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many philosophical scholars believe that justice, liberty, law, and equality are an important aspect among the commonwealth of the nation. Moreover, this paper will focus on the two important political philosophers that argue with the notion and importance of equality and justice in the western society. These philosophers include: Robert Nozick and John Rawls. John Rawls claims that equality and justice is derived from an equal distribution of opportunities, income, wealth, for the general social advantage of the citizen, which includes welfare. Whereas, Robert Nozick defines equality and justice as an entailment to oneself.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe that these two justices’ jurisprudence, or philosophy of law, is shaped by their political ideologies. This is not to say, however, that I believe that the two justices’ political ideologies affect their ability to come to objective decisions since ultimately, their most important task is to remain impartial. The two SCOTUS justices are on the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum. In addition to their opposite ideologies, the pair has two completely different philosophies of law and therefore, vary in their methods of interpretation. Justice Breyer’s political alignment is more towards the liberal side of the court.…

    • 770 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The article “No equal Justice” by David Cole did a good job presenting the differing views of law and policing by different communities. In the article, it describes the race and wealth divide when it comes to the police. While the race distrust is more well documented, the wealth divide is something that as mentioned in the article “less studied” (Cole,171). There is a clear of differences in percentages in the trust in police as stated,” When asked to rank police officers’ use of force, 31% percent of the wealthy but only 17% percent of the poor ranked the police as “excellent(Cole,171). I do wish the article went to more in depth with the economic divide in the perception of the police, as it really is an interesting aspect of the article.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Now that the objection of self-interest has been refuted, the emphasis needs to shift towards an explanation of Rawls second principle of justice. The second principle, commonly referred to as the “Difference Principle,” indicates that, “[S]ocial and economic inequalities are to be arranged so that they are both (a) reasonably expected to be to everyone’s advantage, and (b) attached to positions and offices open to all.” Rawls specifies that the “Liberty Principle” is “lexicographical”. This means that the principles are hierarchically ordered where the first principle must be satisfied before the second can even be considered.…

    • 1606 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Consequently, the Marxist solution for distributive justice is the abolition of private property. Wei then analyzes the writing of Rawls and Nozick to show that their positions are actually similar. Nozick and Rawls both agree that private ownership is a natural result of the Marxist principle of “reward according to effort and ability.” The difference between Rawls and Nozick is that Rawls seeks to improve Marx principle of justice by having it operate through “justice as fairness.”…

    • 1317 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nozick argued against end state or pattern principles of justice. People create wealth. The money that you acquired you can keep if you earned it fairly. For example, if person A has a car and person B has a bike and they interchange willingly, then each person would feel they received of greater or equal value for their exchange. If nobody hurts anyone, or manipulates anyone to get what they want then government should not interfere.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Arc Of Justice Analysis

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages

    African-Americans endured several additional decades of heavy oppression and discrimination even after slavery had already been abolished post-civil war. The Jim Crow laws, which gave African-Americans obvious disadvantage in almost every way possible in the society, were in effect until 1965. These de jure racial segregation laws were put to an end after numerous protests and court cases that slowly showed the country that these laws were barbaric and inhumane. The Arc of Justice written by Kevin Boyle thoroughly explains one of the major court cases that helped America to move one step forward into reaching racial equality and justice. The Sweet trials were a triumph because the Congress passed a federal legislation banning residential segregation…

    • 1766 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert Nozick’s view on the libertarian principle of justice states that it is unjust to force rich people to pay extra taxes for the poor because it takes away from their liberty. In other words, he disagrees with John Rawls’ view of redistributing wealth because the wealthy do not voluntarily give their money to ones in need in this principle. Instead, money from the wealthy is involuntarily taken to give to the poor in the difference principle. However, Nozick does not think that giving to the poor is always bad. To clarify, he thinks that giving to the poor is perfectly just as long as it is voluntary.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Loopholes Analysis

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As I reflect back on the modules we covered during this semester, two particular topics really grabbed my attention “Wrongful Convictions” and “Justice Reinvestment.” These two particular topics provided me another perspective how America’s adversarial system has some deeply rooted flaws embedded it. In which, these flaws have created loopholes in the legal system to allow the local, state, and federal agencies to manipulate the people’s ‘due process and protection against self-incrimination’ during questioning of investigations by law enforcement agencies. In which, walks a fine line with these loopholes in the adversarial system to violate people’s Constitutional rights in the 21st century.…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Archbishop Desmond Tutu expresses in the following simple yet elegant phrase the philosophies inherent in restorative justice, “…true reconciliation exposes the awfulness, the abuse, the hurt, and the truth…”. The frank exposure of emotional, physical and psychological injury may, however, adversely impact the victim(s) or alleged perpetrator in the short term. While restorative justice can be a risky undertaking, “only an honest confrontation with reality can bring real healing”. In the criminal justice system today in the United States, “real healing” seems to be a secondary principle; priority is given to proving the innocence or guilt of the accused in a trial conducted by a judge with the services of lawyers and the jury. The main stakeholders,…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 2015, CEO of Gravity Payments Dan Price, announced his decision to raise the minimum wage of his employees to $70,000 USD over the next 3 years. Dan Price made this decision after reading a happiness study from Princeton that stated employees wellbeing and happiness rose with income increases up to $75,000 USD per year (at which point income stopped affecting happiness.) To fund these increases, the CEO dramatically reduced his salary from $1 Million USD to $70,000 USD and is projecting higher profits in the coming years (O’Brien, 2015). Critics of the decision have been some internal employees who did not think it was fair that their colleagues with less skills and education had their wages raised to the same level as them. Other CEO’s…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Journal "The Need for More Than Justice" written by Annette C. Baier essentially analyzes Carol Gilligan views on matters of women and justice. Baier also discusses many different other philosophers in her analyzation. Gilligan 's theory goes into depth on how care can be an important factor in a women 's outlook on moral issues and moral development. The very first main idea or topic that 's introduced in the journal article is the care or justice perspective. The perspective basically shows or gives the idea that a person 's gender will determine their outlook.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In our readings this week, we discussed procedural justice, due process and whether they are related, in my opinion they are. Procedural justice is the perception that decisions are implemented in fairness and transparency. Due process is when the employer advises the employee with a written notice of the reason for the termination and is presented at least 30 days prior to termination. A copy of the notice will also be sent to the Department of Labor office where the employee’s office is located. When the true process of procedural justice is implemented, people feel they have been treated with respect and dignity allowing the individual to accept outcomes they may not like (Burgess & Cast 2013).…

    • 1873 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon Justice Analysis

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem set 2 1.) What, according to the theory developed by Glaucon in Republic II, is justice? Why and in what sense is it good to be just person, and bad to be an unjust person? According to the theory developed by Glaucon, justice is the case where people agreed to be good to each other, so that not to end up in a chaos.…

    • 1584 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A second objection to Nozicks theory comes from Will Kymlicka, in his book Contemporary Political Philosophy3. He discusses Nozicks example of Wilt Chamberlain, a famous basketballer. The example is put forward that every time people come to see him play, they donate an extra 25 cents which goes directly to Wilt Chamberlain. At the end of the season, if one million people have attended his home games, he could end up with $250,000 extra income. Nozick believes that is entirely peoples choice as to how they choose to redistribute their wealth.…

    • 1849 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays