Distinguish Vitalism From Materialism And Explain The Doctrine Of Specific Energies Of Nerves

Decent Essays
1.) Distinguish vitalism from materialism and explain the doctrine of specific energies of nerves. Vitalism is a belief that a life force or “vital force” existed that goes beyond the physical and chemical components of living organisms and in some part is self determining. These life energies are transmitted through the nervous system and were believed to be instantaneous. Opposed to vitalism, materialism states that physical reality is the only reality and that living matter can be reduced to physical and chemical properties. It is a form of philosophical monism which holds that matter is the fundamental substance in nature and that all things, including mental aspects and consciousness, are results of material interactions. First proposed by Muller, the doctrine of specific energies of nerves states that different sensory nerves convey different qualities. It suggested that we perceive the world indirectly through the actions of our nervous system. Perceptions are defined by the pathway over which the sensory information is carried. The origin of these sensations are not important. -Erica Trujillo

2.) What did Helmholtz mean by the “problem of perception” and how did he resolve it?
…show more content…
He concluded that the structures designed to deliver sensory information seemed to be flawed. The answer to this problem he thought to be found in the doctrine of specific energies of nerves. In the nervous system there is mediation between reality and the mind and we are only aware of the external world. This brings us back to the unconscious inference and as a person gets closer to you the retinal image enlarges but we perceive the person getting closer, not multiplying. Concluding that the person is getting closer and not actually growing. - Kelly

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    He yearns to reduce this entire thing in materialistic terms, yet still preserving the humanistic qualities. He does this by stating mental states are identical with physical states. Although they have this relationship mental states are identical inner states and behavior is an outer state. Thus, this means that if one targets the correct area of the brain he can eliminate these mental states leaving being an animal of stimuli. All of these perspectives shed an illuminating light on the issues of physicalism and dualism which is to be debated for years to come.…

    • 1625 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Jerry Fodor, a philosopher of science, argues that the reduction of special science, or social science, to physical science is problematic because not all types of sciences are physical types. Fodor argues that token physicalism provides a sufficient explanation for this. Token physicalism is the view that all things are physical things, but not all proprieties are physical properties. (Pigliucci).…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1906: Alzheimer's disease is first depicted by Dr. Alois Alzheimer in his patient referred t0 just as Auguste. The patient experienced memory misfortune, distrustfulness, and mental changes. Dr. noted Alzheimer in the dissection that there was shrinkage in and around nerve cells in her cerebrum. 1931:…

    • 337 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2). What is the “mind-body problem,” described in Chapter 4, and how is this problem illustrated in Nagel’s essay on “consciousness”? For example, does Nagel find a solution to the problem? Why or why not? For example, how does he answer the question posed in the title of his essay?…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Morath 11/15/2017 Philosophy of Mind 330 Prof. Jon Stoltz A Non-Reductive Blunder David Chalmers’ attempt to preserve and embrace the mystery of consciousness in his book “The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory” runs contrary to Smart’s Identity Theory of Mind presented in “Sensations and Brain Processes.” This preservation and non-reductive view of mind is, in theory, important to conserving positive phenomenal interactions in the mind, but fails to do so.…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dualism Vs Physicalism

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The view of physicalism gives a stronger and more plausible answer to the mind-body problem. There are several reasons why this particular view gives a more sensible for answer to the problem at hand. These reasons include the rationale behind the reasoning of brain research, how the different aspects of reductive physicalism is able to address the non-physical aspects of the mind, as well as the less than sensible claims that the opposing view, dualism, presents in comparison. One of the main reasons why physicalism is able to prove itself to be the better answer to the mind-body problem is based off of research that society has learned about on the brain.…

    • 1103 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Materialism is a term that refer to all substances that physically exist and occupy space in the universe. An ordinary matter where the term materialism is derived from is an object that is composed of atoms and having a mass. Materialism in philosophical terms is completely different than materialism used in cultural terms. Cultural materialism is a doctrine that material success and progress are the highest values in life. At its simpler level, materialism involves the focus on the idea of the mind and the body.…

    • 1677 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (a) Physicalism is defined as being able to describe everything in our world through physical processes. This means that all facts are the result of physical facts, including brain states. Also, because everything results from physical facts there are only physical facts. Everything is able to be broken down through any means whether through chemistry or biology or any other way to its smallest parts and still be explained by its physical parts. (b) Armstrong’s argument for physicalism is that science is the best way to explain the mind problem.…

    • 1021 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Armstrong’s theory that the mind is the inner cause of a certain behaviour and his idea that it is associated with a physicalist view of human beings, is a complex idea that is also the result of a complex philosophical ‘problem’, one that philosophers from millennia ago tried to solve but it can be said that it is still not solved yet. It is known as the body mind problem and the term physicalism, is by itself an approach to how this problem has been interpreted by different philosophers. The mind-body problem is the attempt to define what each of them is and how these two concepts or aspects are connected to each other, how they are related and in what way we can figure the source of this “problem”, one that he considers unsolved thus far.(D.M…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The extreme positions described by Adler are monism and dualism. The monistic theory stems from the idea that matter and matter alone exists- “that the world consists of nothing but bodies and their motions.” Therefore, there is no-non-material mind; rather the mind is strictly a synonym for the brain. Alder further explains that in monism, “There is nothing to talk or think about except the brain, its activities, its states, and its processes.”…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Final Paper: David Lewis Prompt In his work, Mad Pain and Martian Pain, David Lewis argues that we can apprehend the concept of pain by applying an ambiguous, yet effective Materialist Mixed Theory of mind. The Mixed Theory of mind includes an Identity Theory and a Functionalist Theory—which Lewis must necessarily accept in order to have his theory of pain. Phenomenologists argue that Lewis fails to account for the experience of pain—the what it is like to be in pain and to feel pain. I will argue that David Lewis does not appropriately defend the Phenomenologist’s objections.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The thinker George Berkeley contended against the notion of material substance existing. He built his argument from stringing together a series of claims on being and epistemology, and using them to attack belief in matter and dismiss it. Berkeley begins his argument with an attack on abstract thinking. He claims that generalities do not exist and the qualities of an object cannot exist outside of it.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Part I: Ontological Dualism Implies Embodied Perception Merleau-Ponty is a French philosopher whom was greatly influenced by the earlier phenomenologists Martin Heidegger and Edmund Husserl (Moran & Mooney 2007). In his phenomenology Merleau-Ponty attempts to answer various questions surrounding human existence including questions concerning the constitution of a subject and inter-subjectivity. His inquiry begins by exploring the ideas of embodiment and perception. For Merleau-Ponty finding a new method of inquiry to investigate the mind/body problem would avoid the previous downfalls and shortcomings of classical philosophical approaches.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay, Newton and Darwin’s methods of overcoming limitations of sense experience will be discussed,…

    • 789 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays