Distinctively Visual Analysis Of Venus By David Sando

Venus’ body doesn’t look like a human bodily figure and it’s not supposed to. Her body wasn’t supposed to be exactly the same as the human body, it was supposed to be structural and flow within each other. For example her shoulders run down into her arms in an unbroken stream of movement like her floating hair. It looks like she’s standing but she is supposedly floating on top of the shell. Her body is very in proportionate with her elongated neck and torso. She stands in a classical stance that you would see most commonly in ancient art. The painting isn’t a realistic depiction of the world, but maybe the painter’s imagination of what it would be like.

The colours in this painting are very subtle colours, nothing bright that instantly catches your eye which is good because the spotlight of the painting is Venus and her nudity catches your eye automatically. The painting was a mixture white and blues, apparently Sando intended for the colour blue to predominate the painting. Venus’ hair is a really bright gold and has been said that it was added last in order for it to maintain the brightness of the colour and that it has and it shows on the leaves in the air blowing her way as well. The colour of Venus’ body and the other figures in the painting are …show more content…
So to me that means that the meaning if the artwork was the Goddess of Love is what love is and looks like, how she is not an exact shape of a human being but rhythmic and flowy and that’s like love, how it’s not an exact feeling or action but a mix of emotions and no one’s experience of it is the same. She beautiful and so is love and love is the driving force of life. Without love in the world, there would be nothing and no one and you have to make love to keep the human race going. So I think that Venus the Goddess of Love, is depicted as love