Dissociative Chekhov Disorder

Superior Essays
DCD: Dissociative Chekhovs Disorder
Creative writing is no easy task. Coming up with characters, locations, and situations which can relate to audiences is almost impossible without prior experiences to work off of. Without previous knowledge, writing can fall flat and be hard to relate to. While initially Chekhov’s play The Seagull was a flop due to it’s comedic nature, when it was re-worked in a more serious light as opposed to a farce, it garnered great success. This is in part thanks to the fact that Chekhov did what most writers do, which is write what they know. In The Seagull, Chekhov implemented his own life experience and knowledge into his characters, and had a direct relation to their childhoods, personal lives, and careers.
In The
…show more content…
In the English translation of The Sea-Gull found on Project Gutenberg, Konstantin explains his predicament, saying: “I have neither money nor brains, and on my passport you may read that I am simply a citizen of Kiev. So was my father, but he was a well-known actor.” (Chekhov) Unfortunately for Konstantin, since his mother married a man from Kiev despite her aristocratic heritage, he became conditioned to high life but had no right to bear it. Similarly, Chekhov’s heritage is void of nobility, as is described by the Encyclopedia Britannica: “Chekhov’s father was a struggling grocer and pious martinet who had been born a serf.” (Hingley) Due to his father’s ancestry, Chekhov grew up in a lower-middle-class home. Chekhov was required to help his family pay for living expenses as soon as he was able to, while still keeping up his passion for writing. Because of his experiences in early childhood living with a father who was not well off, Chekhov was able to channel his feelings of self-dependence and uncertainties into the basis of Konstantin’s …show more content…
Trigorin is another character that draws very similar parallels from Chekhov, especially pertaining to Chekhov’s personal life. Trigorin is a very obsessive-compulsive writer who is originally Arkadina’s lover, but becomes persuaded away by the temptations of Nina’s innocence and optimism. Trigorin also spends a lot of his free time fishing, and this hobby is noted several times in the Project Gutenberg translation of The Sea-Gull, the most relevant being when Trigorin says: “I love fishing. I know of nothing pleasanter than to sit on a lake shore in the evening with one's eyes on a floating cork.” (Chekhov) Though this may seem unimportant and trivial, it should be noted that this is the only other hobby Trigorin speaks of; the rest of his time is devoted to writing. This is especially evident in his quote from the Martin Crimp translation when he says: “And even when I stop working and drag myself off to the theatre, or out fishing, to forget, to empty my mind, I can’t…” (Chekhov 30) Trigorin uses fishing as an escape from the constant drive to write. Unsurprisingly, Chekhov was also a great fan of fishing, as he detailed often in his personal letters, saying: “Every day I row to the mill, and in the evening I go to the islands to fish with fishing maniacs from the Haritovenko factory.” (Chekhov) Even more interesting is Chekhov’s eagerness to fish,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    At first, he was feared by Rainsford, was actually both deaf and mute. Ivan was, in a way, useless. The irony of this story is key because without irony there would be not point or purpose to this work, which for this particular short story was to expose an aspect of the human…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arkady Kirsanov has just graduated from the University of Petersburg and returns with a friend, Bazarov, to his father's modest estate in an outlying province of Russia. The father gladly receives the two young men at his estate, called Marino, but Nikolai's brother, Pavel, soon becomes upset by the strange new philosophy called "nihilism" which the young men advocate. Nikolai feels awkward with his son at home, partially because Arkady's views have dated his own beliefs, and partially because he has taken a servant, Fenichka, into his house to live with him and has already had a son by her. The two young men remain at Marino for a short time, then decide to visit a relative of Arkady's in a neighboring province. There they observe the local…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the story, Anton Chekhov succeeds in certain decisions in his adaptation, such as placing the readers in suspense, while Oates does the better job in other aspects of her own version, such as ........ In the “Lady with the Little Dog”, Chekhov makes the character's thoughts come true to life. For example, when Gurov goes to the theater, he thinks to himself "It's very likely that she goes to opening nights," he thought" (Chekhov 240). Another time, following his first meeting with Anna, he thinks about her and assumes that "she would probably meet him again" (Chekhov 234). I think this really helps the development of the story because it gives the reader a glimpse of what is to come and allows the reader to remain in…

    • 1056 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Leo Tolstoy Analysis

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages

    He mostly made his life choices based upon what he thought the people around him would approve. Tolstoy expresses this as, “…the desire to be better not in my own eyes or those of God but in the eyes of other people…this…

    • 1822 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This is not a cold hearted or dissociative behavior towards her children, but a narrative that reflects the strength of a mother I these dire social and economic times. Anna is a sympathetic woman that gives her children a chance to improve themselves, which typically ends in failure. However, Anna is a sympathetic woman that may appear to be cold in the delivery of her narrative, but her actions define a condemnation of unsympathetic attitudes her role as a mother. Petrushevskaya provides a narrative of the suffering and jaded life of Anna, but she is not an unsympathetic woman when it comes to keeping family…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Dimitri is arrested for Fyodor’s murder, Ivan feels guilty and defensively says “I’m not my brother’s keeper,” but Ivan finally accepts the guilt. Digging even deeper into Ivan’s childhood, it is apparent that in contrast to Alyosha, who we earlier discussed was carefree of where he lived, Ivan has alway been conscious and critical of these things. Therefore, he naturally possessed the inclination of an intellectual mind. However, what further complicates Ivan is a combination between a brilliant analytical mind and a heart that loves humanity but only shows concern on scholarly critics who distances himself from directly interacting in a loving manner with people. This intellectual and detached characteristic contrasts the active love Father Zosima teachers and Alyosha practices.…

    • 1348 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tolstoy states that even Ivan’s marriage is influenced by his desire to please those around him “Ivan was doing what was agreeable for himself in securing such a wife, and at the same time doing what persons of higher standing looked upon as the correct thing.” (100) Maryann Felps argues that “In reading Ivan’s story, students learn the consequences when one does not make wise decisions. Ivan does not choose prudently; he lives as his circle of friends live-- doing what is expected, but not what is in his or his family’s best interests.” The rest of Ivan’s life is not much different from his marriage. He peels back the layers of the onion, as he enters new circles.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By breaking through his selfishness and cowardice as though “he fell through the hole and there at the bottom was a light,” (Tolstoy 155) Ivan Ilych comes to an appreciation that love holds more importance than social status and propriety. He becomes a hero to the reader because he discerns that only love remains when all other material possessions waste away. In the final hours of his life, the love from Ivan Ilych’s son shines through his suffering and humbles him because he recognizes that his selfishness developed into a cruel impediment to his family’s happiness. Therefore, dying becomes Ivan Ilych’s greatest act of heroism because he abandons his self-centeredness and bravely sacrifices himself to relieve the burden he places on his family.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Leo Tolstoy wrote: The Death of Ivan Ilyich in 1886 to show his view of how life should be, how we all should live, and what actually matter most at the end of everything. According to Tolstoy, there are 2 ways to live life; one is by outer appearance which are propriety, decorum, and standards of conduct, and second, inner appearances, and spiritual life which are “the real thing” that makes one’s life worthwhile. Insincere life style is the first way human can choose to live and it is shown at the beginning of novel when Tostoy explains that Ivan Ilyich’s life is based on an outer appearances and social statuses means. He is surround by “the best circles of lawyers, and wealthy gentry in town...” (54).…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    These early associations with a wider range of social classes, and even from the bottom, caused Herzen to experience an estrangement from his own aristocratic peers. Although, at the time he doubtlessly saw no such result, as an adult, writing his memoirs it was quite apparent. The alienation from his father, whom from Herzen’s perspective writing as an adult also stands for all Russian aristocracy, stemmed from his father's archaic and petty life. Neither fully Russian or European, he failed to run his life successfully relationally or logistically. The only way his father coped was to treat all with equal contempt.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chekhov uses Andrei Yefimych as a symbol of the actions and ideas of the majority, and the treatment of his character shows what happens when someone even seems to demur the status quo. One of Andrei’s identifying traits is his belief in Stoicism, a Greek school of philosophy that taught that virtue is based on knowledge, and that the wise ignore and remain indifferent to suffering and the vicissitudes of fortune. Chekhov deliberately crafts Andrei to partake in this belief system to weaken his character and establish his timid personality; because Andrei believes in Stoicism, he does not question or attempt to change anything unsatisfactory in his life. The author even directly states that Andrei, “is positively incapable of ordering, prohibiting,…

    • 810 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Despite Gerasim’s apparent lack of money, every description of the servant is accompanied by his clean appearance that is amplified by his “even row of healthy white” teeth (Tolstoy, 47). Gerasim’s salary is enough to feed, house, and clean himself. Tolstoy is not suggesting money is the root of the isolating behavior that afflicts Ivan and his family. Instead, Tolstoy uses Gerasim’s appearance to suggest that only the wrongful use of excessive money leads to an avoidance of life and an avoidance of suffering. In contrast, Ivan suffers greatly during his final few months of life.…

    • 1389 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Exile” is a short story written by Anton Chekhov and is based on his real life experiences. This is one of the few stories that arose directly from Chekhov 's extended trip to Sakhalin Island in 1890 (Coulehan). He carefully recorded the misery of the inhabitants of the five-hundred-mile long island by speaking up to 160 people each day (Gale). Chekhov tells a story of several men that are in exile and the exchange that takes place between two of the men. A third-person narrator tells us, “Old Semyon, whose nickname was preacher, and a young tartar, whose name no one knew, were sitting by a campfire on the bank of the river” (Chekhov 111).…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sergei’s paranoia is his main attribute that forms his other traits and persona. It leads to his hostility as too protect himself because of his belief that no one would want to create a ny sort of relationship with him without an ulterior motive. This results in him having no social relationships, making him lonely.…

    • 1227 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He represents the inability of the poor to sympathize, due to the immensity of their own tribulations. Communication and its interruptions bear much importance throughout Chekhov's story. In particular, the author focuses on the extent of communication between people of different social classes in an attempt to highlight the harshness of man and his unwillingness to help one another. Whether it is caused by arrogance or impotence, every character who crosses his path denies him the sympathy of acknowledgment. None of his passengers ever care about his story.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays