The next interrupt function is disruptive or disturbing. James and Clarke (1993) in Tannen (1993, p.242) explains that the interruption as disruptive is when the hearer take over the speaking turn with no giving the right of the speaker until the hearer finishes the utterance. This interruption indicates domination, confrontation, and competition. Annoying interruption also has the purpose to intimidate the marginal parties to the dominant parties.
A disturbing interruption also serves to intimidate parties marginal against the dominant parties .The example (8) below is an example of disruptive interruption according to Tannen (1994, p.163)
(8) H : Television is not good for children, I think // that --- W :
A disturbing interruption also serves to intimidate parties marginal against the dominant parties .The example (8) below is an example of disruptive interruption according to Tannen (1994, p.163)
(8) H : Television is not good for children, I think // that --- W :